“变性青蛙让你的儿子变成同性恋”:濒危的两栖动物、雌激素污染和雄性灭绝

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Frontiers-A Journal of Women Studies Pub Date : 2023-03-27 DOI:10.1353/fro.2023.0002
M. Perret
{"title":"“变性青蛙让你的儿子变成同性恋”:濒危的两栖动物、雌激素污染和雄性灭绝","authors":"M. Perret","doi":"10.1353/fro.2023.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Scientists, conservationists, and environmentalists argue that the use of Atrazine, one of the most commonly used herbicides in the US, contributes to global amphibian population declines and extinctions. Researchers have also linked Atrazine to increased rates of cancer and other health complications in humans that disproportionately affect already marginalized communities. However, prevailing public discourse has focused primarily on the speculative risks that Atrazine, as an endocrine disruptor, could pose to normative human gender, sex, and sexuality. These concerns were sparked by experiments in the early 2000s, conducted by Dr. Tyrone Hayes and colleagues, characterizing frogs exposed to Atrazine as “feminized” and “chemically castrated.” I find that scientific and popular discourse surrounding the Atrazine controversy encodes cultural anxieties about the maintenance of normative masculinities and the future of humanity in an increasingly toxic world. Moreover, depending on the context, rhetorical depictions of frogs exposed to Atrazine reify binary sex/gender or, contrastingly, affirm sexual diversity. The case of Atrazine demonstrates that environmental discourse can sustain normalized and naturalized ideas of gender, sex, and sexuality even as the meanings imposed on them are contradictory and contextual.","PeriodicalId":46007,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers-A Journal of Women Studies","volume":"44 1","pages":"27 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Transgender Frogs Turn Your Son Gay”: Endangered Amphibians, Estrogenic Pollution, and Male Extinction\",\"authors\":\"M. Perret\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/fro.2023.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Scientists, conservationists, and environmentalists argue that the use of Atrazine, one of the most commonly used herbicides in the US, contributes to global amphibian population declines and extinctions. Researchers have also linked Atrazine to increased rates of cancer and other health complications in humans that disproportionately affect already marginalized communities. However, prevailing public discourse has focused primarily on the speculative risks that Atrazine, as an endocrine disruptor, could pose to normative human gender, sex, and sexuality. These concerns were sparked by experiments in the early 2000s, conducted by Dr. Tyrone Hayes and colleagues, characterizing frogs exposed to Atrazine as “feminized” and “chemically castrated.” I find that scientific and popular discourse surrounding the Atrazine controversy encodes cultural anxieties about the maintenance of normative masculinities and the future of humanity in an increasingly toxic world. Moreover, depending on the context, rhetorical depictions of frogs exposed to Atrazine reify binary sex/gender or, contrastingly, affirm sexual diversity. The case of Atrazine demonstrates that environmental discourse can sustain normalized and naturalized ideas of gender, sex, and sexuality even as the meanings imposed on them are contradictory and contextual.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers-A Journal of Women Studies\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"27 - 52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers-A Journal of Women Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/fro.2023.0002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers-A Journal of Women Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/fro.2023.0002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:科学家、自然资源保护主义者和环境保护主义者认为,阿特拉津是美国最常用的除草剂之一,它的使用导致了全球两栖动物数量的减少和灭绝。研究人员还将阿特拉津与人类癌症和其他健康并发症的发病率上升联系起来,这些疾病对已经被边缘化的社区造成了不成比例的影响。然而,主流的公共话语主要集中在阿特拉津作为内分泌干扰物可能对人类正常性别、性和性行为构成的推测性风险上。21世纪初,泰龙·海耶斯(Tyrone Hayes)博士及其同事进行的实验引发了这些担忧,他们将接触阿特拉津的青蛙描述为“雌性化”和“化学阉割”。我发现,围绕阿特拉津争议的科学和大众话语,编码了对在一个日益有毒的世界中维持规范的男性气概和人类未来的文化焦虑。此外,根据上下文,对暴露于阿特拉津的青蛙的修辞描述具体化了二元性/性别,或者相反,肯定了性别多样性。阿特拉津的案例表明,环境话语可以维持性别、性和性行为的正常化和自然化观念,即使强加给它们的意义是矛盾的和背景的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Transgender Frogs Turn Your Son Gay”: Endangered Amphibians, Estrogenic Pollution, and Male Extinction
Abstract:Scientists, conservationists, and environmentalists argue that the use of Atrazine, one of the most commonly used herbicides in the US, contributes to global amphibian population declines and extinctions. Researchers have also linked Atrazine to increased rates of cancer and other health complications in humans that disproportionately affect already marginalized communities. However, prevailing public discourse has focused primarily on the speculative risks that Atrazine, as an endocrine disruptor, could pose to normative human gender, sex, and sexuality. These concerns were sparked by experiments in the early 2000s, conducted by Dr. Tyrone Hayes and colleagues, characterizing frogs exposed to Atrazine as “feminized” and “chemically castrated.” I find that scientific and popular discourse surrounding the Atrazine controversy encodes cultural anxieties about the maintenance of normative masculinities and the future of humanity in an increasingly toxic world. Moreover, depending on the context, rhetorical depictions of frogs exposed to Atrazine reify binary sex/gender or, contrastingly, affirm sexual diversity. The case of Atrazine demonstrates that environmental discourse can sustain normalized and naturalized ideas of gender, sex, and sexuality even as the meanings imposed on them are contradictory and contextual.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Forms and Elements in Architecture Modern Primitive (2020–Ongoing): Ink and Pencil Crayon on Paper On the Lateness of Pandemic Time “Transgender Frogs Turn Your Son Gay”: Endangered Amphibians, Estrogenic Pollution, and Male Extinction The Temporality of Breath: Under Racial Capitalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1