自动控制炮塔炮仿真与实验

Mohamad Nasyir Tamara, Bambang Pramujati, Hendro Nurhadi, Endra Pitowarno
{"title":"自动控制炮塔炮仿真与实验","authors":"Mohamad Nasyir Tamara, Bambang Pramujati, Hendro Nurhadi, Endra Pitowarno","doi":"10.33795/eltek.v16i1.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research presented Active Force Control (AFC) as a control method which is applied to Automatic Turret gun (ATG) in ground combat vehicles This method compares the reference force conducted by actuator with actual force of the mechanical systems that arise due to disturbances. The advantage of AFC method is its ability to handle disturbances effectively without complicated mathematical calculations. The AFC method uses Crude Approximation (CA) in the internal loop controller AFC as inertia matrix estimator as an important part in the control loop.  Simulation without load on the azimuth movement shows PID controller produces the best precision with MSE of 0 degrees while RACAFC and RAC method provide MSE 0.267 degrees. In simulation on the elevation movement, the RAC method showed the best results with an estimated MSE of the targets shot of 2.42 degrees, while the PID and RACAFC method are 2.5 and 2.46 degrees. When simulation is conducted with additional load RACAFC method gives the best precision with a MSE of 0.267 and 2:46 degrees, while the PID method was 4.24 and the 10.52 degrees. RAC method produces MSE of 0.7 and 2.87 degrees. With the added load the performance of PID controller decreases. In the experiment on the constructed rig, RAC and RACAFC scheme produce smoother movement trajectory and minimum oscillation compared to the PID controller. In loaded conditions these methods are able to maintain their performance. However, these three methods can still achieve a reference point with or without load in the end of travel time","PeriodicalId":53405,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Eltek","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SIMULASI DAN EKSPERIMEN KONTROL AUTOMATIC TURRET GUN\",\"authors\":\"Mohamad Nasyir Tamara, Bambang Pramujati, Hendro Nurhadi, Endra Pitowarno\",\"doi\":\"10.33795/eltek.v16i1.82\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research presented Active Force Control (AFC) as a control method which is applied to Automatic Turret gun (ATG) in ground combat vehicles This method compares the reference force conducted by actuator with actual force of the mechanical systems that arise due to disturbances. The advantage of AFC method is its ability to handle disturbances effectively without complicated mathematical calculations. The AFC method uses Crude Approximation (CA) in the internal loop controller AFC as inertia matrix estimator as an important part in the control loop.  Simulation without load on the azimuth movement shows PID controller produces the best precision with MSE of 0 degrees while RACAFC and RAC method provide MSE 0.267 degrees. In simulation on the elevation movement, the RAC method showed the best results with an estimated MSE of the targets shot of 2.42 degrees, while the PID and RACAFC method are 2.5 and 2.46 degrees. When simulation is conducted with additional load RACAFC method gives the best precision with a MSE of 0.267 and 2:46 degrees, while the PID method was 4.24 and the 10.52 degrees. RAC method produces MSE of 0.7 and 2.87 degrees. With the added load the performance of PID controller decreases. In the experiment on the constructed rig, RAC and RACAFC scheme produce smoother movement trajectory and minimum oscillation compared to the PID controller. In loaded conditions these methods are able to maintain their performance. However, these three methods can still achieve a reference point with or without load in the end of travel time\",\"PeriodicalId\":53405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Eltek\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Eltek\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33795/eltek.v16i1.82\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Eltek","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33795/eltek.v16i1.82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究将主动力控制(AFC)作为一种应用于地面战车自动炮塔炮(ATG)的控制方法。该方法将执行器所施加的参考力与机械系统因扰动而产生的实际力进行比较。AFC方法的优点是能够有效地处理扰动,而无需复杂的数学计算。AFC方法在内部回路控制器AFC中使用粗近似(CA)作为惯性矩阵估计器,惯性矩阵是控制回路中的重要组成部分。无负载方位运动仿真表明,PID控制器在MSE为0度时产生最佳精度,而RACAFC和RAC方法提供的MSE为0.267度。在对仰角运动的模拟中,RAC方法显示出最好的结果,目标射击的估计MSE为2.42度,而PID和RACAFC方法分别为2.5和2.46度。当在附加负载下进行模拟时,RACAFC方法给出了最佳精度,MSE分别为0.267和2:46度,而PID方法分别为4.24和10.52度。RAC方法产生0.7和2.87度的MSE。随着负载的增加,PID控制器的性能下降。在所构建的平台上的实验中,与PID控制器相比,RAC和RACAFC方案产生了更平滑的运动轨迹和最小的振荡。在负载条件下,这些方法能够保持其性能。然而,这三种方法仍然可以在旅行时间结束时实现有负载或无负载的参考点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SIMULASI DAN EKSPERIMEN KONTROL AUTOMATIC TURRET GUN
This research presented Active Force Control (AFC) as a control method which is applied to Automatic Turret gun (ATG) in ground combat vehicles This method compares the reference force conducted by actuator with actual force of the mechanical systems that arise due to disturbances. The advantage of AFC method is its ability to handle disturbances effectively without complicated mathematical calculations. The AFC method uses Crude Approximation (CA) in the internal loop controller AFC as inertia matrix estimator as an important part in the control loop.  Simulation without load on the azimuth movement shows PID controller produces the best precision with MSE of 0 degrees while RACAFC and RAC method provide MSE 0.267 degrees. In simulation on the elevation movement, the RAC method showed the best results with an estimated MSE of the targets shot of 2.42 degrees, while the PID and RACAFC method are 2.5 and 2.46 degrees. When simulation is conducted with additional load RACAFC method gives the best precision with a MSE of 0.267 and 2:46 degrees, while the PID method was 4.24 and the 10.52 degrees. RAC method produces MSE of 0.7 and 2.87 degrees. With the added load the performance of PID controller decreases. In the experiment on the constructed rig, RAC and RACAFC scheme produce smoother movement trajectory and minimum oscillation compared to the PID controller. In loaded conditions these methods are able to maintain their performance. However, these three methods can still achieve a reference point with or without load in the end of travel time
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rancang bangun alat kasir barang otomatis berbasis RFID Peningkatan efisiensi sistem PLTS melalui optimasi susunan array panel surya Studi penyebab dan penanganan fail detection pada shinkawa vibration sensors unit circulating water pump di PT. X menggunakan metode root cause failure analysis Analisa response transient cascade control temperature dan pressure pada furnace PT. Z menggunakan metode direct synthesis Sintesis Dan Karakterisasi Material Katoda LiMn0,7Fe0,3-xNixPO4/C Dengan 0 ≤ X ≤ 0,2 Dalam Aplikasi Baterai Litium-Ion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1