新冠肺炎封锁对英国公共图书馆的影响:一项全国性研究结果

IF 1.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Public Library Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-03-28 DOI:10.1080/01616846.2022.2058860
David McMenemy, Elaine Robinson, I. Ruthven
{"title":"新冠肺炎封锁对英国公共图书馆的影响:一项全国性研究结果","authors":"David McMenemy, Elaine Robinson, I. Ruthven","doi":"10.1080/01616846.2022.2058860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper explores how public libraries in the United Kingdom were impacted by the lockdowns imposed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Freedom of Information requests were made to all UK public library services. The data received indicated that almost 65% of UK library services saw a reduction in physical loans of between 70% and 90% of pre-pandemic borrowing levels. The cumulative data also revealed that almost 120 million books that were issued in pre-pandemic years were not issued in the 2020/21 lockdown period. Meanwhile, 47% of library services saw their e-loan provision rise between 100% and 200% on pre-pandemic levels, although these numbers rose from a low base and were comparatively small when measured against physical loan losses. The data also highlighted that active membership of the public library services (members who had borrowed an item in the previous year) dropped to 40% of pre-pandemic levels across the UK. The evidence highlights that while e-loan provision rose significantly while physical library services were largely unavailable, this rise was from a very low base, and this rise in digital usage did not come close to mitigating the drop in physical borrowing that occurred across the UK. The findings of the paper suggest that even when the public had no choice but to move to digital, they did so in limited numbers when compared to usage of physical library buildings and collections.","PeriodicalId":45177,"journal":{"name":"Public Library Quarterly","volume":"42 1","pages":"92 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of COVID-19 Lockdowns on Public Libraries in the UK: Findings from a National Study\",\"authors\":\"David McMenemy, Elaine Robinson, I. Ruthven\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01616846.2022.2058860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper explores how public libraries in the United Kingdom were impacted by the lockdowns imposed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Freedom of Information requests were made to all UK public library services. The data received indicated that almost 65% of UK library services saw a reduction in physical loans of between 70% and 90% of pre-pandemic borrowing levels. The cumulative data also revealed that almost 120 million books that were issued in pre-pandemic years were not issued in the 2020/21 lockdown period. Meanwhile, 47% of library services saw their e-loan provision rise between 100% and 200% on pre-pandemic levels, although these numbers rose from a low base and were comparatively small when measured against physical loan losses. The data also highlighted that active membership of the public library services (members who had borrowed an item in the previous year) dropped to 40% of pre-pandemic levels across the UK. The evidence highlights that while e-loan provision rose significantly while physical library services were largely unavailable, this rise was from a very low base, and this rise in digital usage did not come close to mitigating the drop in physical borrowing that occurred across the UK. The findings of the paper suggest that even when the public had no choice but to move to digital, they did so in limited numbers when compared to usage of physical library buildings and collections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Library Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"92 - 110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Library Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2022.2058860\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Library Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2022.2058860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本文探讨了英国公共图书馆如何受到COVID-19大流行导致的封锁的影响。英国所有公共图书馆都提出了信息自由要求。收到的数据表明,近65%的英国图书馆服务的实物借阅减少了疫情前的70%至90%。累计数据还显示,在大流行前几年发行的近1.2亿本书在2020/21年的封锁期间没有发行。与此同时,47%的图书馆服务的电子借阅供应在疫情前的水平上增长了100%至200%,尽管这些数字的基数较低,与实物借阅损失相比相对较小。数据还强调,英国公共图书馆服务的活跃会员(前一年借阅过图书的会员)降至疫情前水平的40%。有证据表明,虽然电子借阅的供应显著增加,而实体图书馆的服务在很大程度上是不可用的,但这一增长的基数非常低,而且数字使用的增加并没有接近于缓解整个英国实体借阅的下降。论文的研究结果表明,即使公众别无选择,只能转向数字化,与使用实体图书馆建筑和馆藏相比,他们这样做的人数也有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of COVID-19 Lockdowns on Public Libraries in the UK: Findings from a National Study
ABSTRACT This paper explores how public libraries in the United Kingdom were impacted by the lockdowns imposed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Freedom of Information requests were made to all UK public library services. The data received indicated that almost 65% of UK library services saw a reduction in physical loans of between 70% and 90% of pre-pandemic borrowing levels. The cumulative data also revealed that almost 120 million books that were issued in pre-pandemic years were not issued in the 2020/21 lockdown period. Meanwhile, 47% of library services saw their e-loan provision rise between 100% and 200% on pre-pandemic levels, although these numbers rose from a low base and were comparatively small when measured against physical loan losses. The data also highlighted that active membership of the public library services (members who had borrowed an item in the previous year) dropped to 40% of pre-pandemic levels across the UK. The evidence highlights that while e-loan provision rose significantly while physical library services were largely unavailable, this rise was from a very low base, and this rise in digital usage did not come close to mitigating the drop in physical borrowing that occurred across the UK. The findings of the paper suggest that even when the public had no choice but to move to digital, they did so in limited numbers when compared to usage of physical library buildings and collections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Library Quarterly
Public Library Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Public Libraries Quarterly is addressed to leaders-directors, managers, staff, trustees, and friends-who believe that change is imperative if public libraries are to fulfill their service missions in the twenty-first century. In PLQ, directors and operating officers tell how they accomplished change. The journal examines: •best practices and models to improve service •management case studies-with results and failures •library mythologies that retard individual and institutional development •studies of how to plan results and accomplish desired outcomes •marketing and fund-raising tools that work •budget and financial analysis tools and tips
期刊最新文献
Recommendations and Public Understanding from Public Library Practitioners Experiencing Cases of Censorship: A Qualitative Study iLead with an EDI Lens Exploring the Nexus: Homeschooling and Library Engagement in Connecticut Urban Public Libraries in the 1980s: Evolving Library Services for an Information Society Transforming Children’s Library Services: Literacy and Competency Development Perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1