机械劳动和肉质分娩:米娜·洛伊和威廉·卡洛斯·威廉姆斯的母亲抵抗

Schnur
{"title":"机械劳动和肉质分娩:米娜·洛伊和威廉·卡洛斯·威廉姆斯的母亲抵抗","authors":"Schnur","doi":"10.5325/willcarlwillrevi.37.1.0094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This article analyzes Mina Loy's and William Carlos Williams's depictions of childbirth within the context of the Futurist movement and its approach to gender, sexuality, and the body. Parturient bodies are constantly either erased or hyper-corporealized in ways that pose problems for these poets' aesthetics. This article argues that Williams's constant, simultaneous fascination with, and disgust for, women's bodies in labor—an anxiety that is a hallmark of his career—is a response to the technologically mediated and mechanical bodies at the center of Futurist aesthetics. Using Mina Loy, whose work critics often read as feminist interventions in Futurism, as a departure point for understanding Williams, this article argues that both Williams and Loy use birth as a focal point for understanding the limits of the body and the malleability of its physical boundaries within modernist poetics, effectively rejecting Futurism's avant-garde embrace of the mechanical body.","PeriodicalId":53869,"journal":{"name":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical Labor and Fleshy Births: Maternal Resistance in Mina Loy and William Carlos Williams\",\"authors\":\"Schnur\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/willcarlwillrevi.37.1.0094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:This article analyzes Mina Loy's and William Carlos Williams's depictions of childbirth within the context of the Futurist movement and its approach to gender, sexuality, and the body. Parturient bodies are constantly either erased or hyper-corporealized in ways that pose problems for these poets' aesthetics. This article argues that Williams's constant, simultaneous fascination with, and disgust for, women's bodies in labor—an anxiety that is a hallmark of his career—is a response to the technologically mediated and mechanical bodies at the center of Futurist aesthetics. Using Mina Loy, whose work critics often read as feminist interventions in Futurism, as a departure point for understanding Williams, this article argues that both Williams and Loy use birth as a focal point for understanding the limits of the body and the malleability of its physical boundaries within modernist poetics, effectively rejecting Futurism's avant-garde embrace of the mechanical body.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/willcarlwillrevi.37.1.0094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/willcarlwillrevi.37.1.0094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文分析了米娜·洛伊和威廉·卡洛斯·威廉姆斯在未来主义运动背景下对分娩的描绘及其对性别、性和身体的态度。孕妇的身体不断地被抹去,或者以超肉体化的方式实现,这给这些诗人的美学带来了问题。这篇文章认为,威廉姆斯对劳动中的女性身体的持续、同时的迷恋和厌恶——这是他职业生涯的一个标志——是对未来主义美学中心的技术中介和机械身体的回应。本文以米娜·洛伊(Mina Loy)作为理解威廉姆斯的出发点,认为威廉姆斯和洛伊都将出生作为理解现代主义诗学中身体极限及其物理边界可延展性的焦点,有效地拒绝了未来主义对机械身体的前卫拥抱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mechanical Labor and Fleshy Births: Maternal Resistance in Mina Loy and William Carlos Williams
ABSTRACT:This article analyzes Mina Loy's and William Carlos Williams's depictions of childbirth within the context of the Futurist movement and its approach to gender, sexuality, and the body. Parturient bodies are constantly either erased or hyper-corporealized in ways that pose problems for these poets' aesthetics. This article argues that Williams's constant, simultaneous fascination with, and disgust for, women's bodies in labor—an anxiety that is a hallmark of his career—is a response to the technologically mediated and mechanical bodies at the center of Futurist aesthetics. Using Mina Loy, whose work critics often read as feminist interventions in Futurism, as a departure point for understanding Williams, this article argues that both Williams and Loy use birth as a focal point for understanding the limits of the body and the malleability of its physical boundaries within modernist poetics, effectively rejecting Futurism's avant-garde embrace of the mechanical body.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
“No One to Witness and Adjust”: The Academy Still in Peril Spring and All No Longer in Peril Spring and All: The Present 100 Years Later Modernist Hangover? William Carlos Williams as Bob Perelman’s Poetic Cure Which Side Are You On?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1