非洲和拉丁美洲区域国际法院环境诉讼的法律地位

Sonja Kahl
{"title":"非洲和拉丁美洲区域国际法院环境诉讼的法律地位","authors":"Sonja Kahl","doi":"10.25167/osap.4872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article compares the rules governing legal standing before selected regional international judicial and quasi-judicial bodies in Africa and Latin America from a perspective of environmental litigation. The focus is on active legal standing of private entities in contentious proceedings against states. The article sytematizes the rules governing legal standing into two broad categories: rights based and public interest litigation. Subsequently, the approach of each court will be analyzed on the basis of its procedural rules and jurisprudence. Several trends can be identified, including a tendency of human rights courts to move towards public interest litigation, a trend to grant non-governmental organizations a privileged position to initiate environmental litigation, and the development of Community rights based approached by courts for regional economic integration that could become relevant in the future.","PeriodicalId":34464,"journal":{"name":"Opolskie Studia AdministracyjnoPrawne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Standing in Environmental Litigation before Regional International Courts in Africa and Latin America\",\"authors\":\"Sonja Kahl\",\"doi\":\"10.25167/osap.4872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article compares the rules governing legal standing before selected regional international judicial and quasi-judicial bodies in Africa and Latin America from a perspective of environmental litigation. The focus is on active legal standing of private entities in contentious proceedings against states. The article sytematizes the rules governing legal standing into two broad categories: rights based and public interest litigation. Subsequently, the approach of each court will be analyzed on the basis of its procedural rules and jurisprudence. Several trends can be identified, including a tendency of human rights courts to move towards public interest litigation, a trend to grant non-governmental organizations a privileged position to initiate environmental litigation, and the development of Community rights based approached by courts for regional economic integration that could become relevant in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Opolskie Studia AdministracyjnoPrawne\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Opolskie Studia AdministracyjnoPrawne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.4872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Opolskie Studia AdministracyjnoPrawne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.4872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从环境诉讼的角度比较了非洲和拉丁美洲选定的区域国际司法和准司法机构的法律地位规则。重点是私人实体在针对国家的诉讼中的积极法律地位。本文将法律地位规则分为两大类:基于权利的诉讼和公共利益诉讼。随后,将根据各法院的程序规则和判例分析各法院的做法。可以确定一些趋势,包括人权法院倾向于提起公共利益诉讼,给予非政府组织提起环境诉讼的特权地位的趋势,以及法院为实现区域经济一体化而采取的基于社区权利的做法的发展,这些做法可能在未来变得重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Legal Standing in Environmental Litigation before Regional International Courts in Africa and Latin America
This article compares the rules governing legal standing before selected regional international judicial and quasi-judicial bodies in Africa and Latin America from a perspective of environmental litigation. The focus is on active legal standing of private entities in contentious proceedings against states. The article sytematizes the rules governing legal standing into two broad categories: rights based and public interest litigation. Subsequently, the approach of each court will be analyzed on the basis of its procedural rules and jurisprudence. Several trends can be identified, including a tendency of human rights courts to move towards public interest litigation, a trend to grant non-governmental organizations a privileged position to initiate environmental litigation, and the development of Community rights based approached by courts for regional economic integration that could become relevant in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
The need for protection of environmental defenders from digital intimidation: an analysis of Article 3(8) of the Aarhus Convention An Economic Analysis of Iran’s 2017 Judicial System Reforms: Ways with Long-term Effects to Improve Judicial System’s Litigation Delay Access to justice regarding plans and programmes related to the environment – Polish law in the light of Article 9.3 of the Aarhus Convention Wolność gospodarcza i jej ograniczenia na tle różnych modeli ekonomicznych Zakaz wydawania wiążących poleceń przez radę nadzorczą zarządowi spółki z o.o.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1