利用梅斯卡尔酒糟与牛粪共消化产生甲烷

IF 0.5 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Biotecnia Pub Date : 2022-05-31 DOI:10.18633/biotecnia.v24i2.1501
Edwin Alfonso Zelaya-Benavidez, G. A. Martínez-Gutiérrez, Celerino Robles Pérez, Isidro Morales García
{"title":"利用梅斯卡尔酒糟与牛粪共消化产生甲烷","authors":"Edwin Alfonso Zelaya-Benavidez, G. A. Martínez-Gutiérrez, Celerino Robles Pérez, Isidro Morales García","doi":"10.18633/biotecnia.v24i2.1501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The best co-digestion ratio between mezcal vinasses and bovine manure was investigated to produce methane.Five vinasses and bovine manure mixtures in different proportionswere compared (v/v): 25-75, 50-50, 75-25, 100-0, and 0-100, with six replications. As reactors, 496 mL glasscontainers with hermetic seal were used, with 300 mL of active volume under mesophilic conditions (36 ± 1 oC) for 10 days. The pH, total solids, and volatile solids of vinasses,bovine manure, and their mixtures were determined in triplicate.The methane accumulated volume was greater with the 0-100 and 75-25, followed by the 100-0, with 286.23, 286.40, and 225.48 NmL CH4, respectively. Methane yield was higher with 100-0 and 75-25 with 28.27 and 22.77 NmL CH4 g-1volatile solids, respectively. The Gompertz bacterial growthmodel showed that the micro-organisms adaptation periodin vinasses was longer than in bovine manure. Co-digestionof vinasses and bovine manure in proportion 75-25 % improvedthe methane production by 26.7 % with respect to the digestion of vinasses alone, and reduced the adaptation timeof bacteria to vinasses by 4.12 days.","PeriodicalId":8876,"journal":{"name":"Biotecnia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uso de vinazas de mezcal para producir metano por co-digestión con estiércol de bovino\",\"authors\":\"Edwin Alfonso Zelaya-Benavidez, G. A. Martínez-Gutiérrez, Celerino Robles Pérez, Isidro Morales García\",\"doi\":\"10.18633/biotecnia.v24i2.1501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The best co-digestion ratio between mezcal vinasses and bovine manure was investigated to produce methane.Five vinasses and bovine manure mixtures in different proportionswere compared (v/v): 25-75, 50-50, 75-25, 100-0, and 0-100, with six replications. As reactors, 496 mL glasscontainers with hermetic seal were used, with 300 mL of active volume under mesophilic conditions (36 ± 1 oC) for 10 days. The pH, total solids, and volatile solids of vinasses,bovine manure, and their mixtures were determined in triplicate.The methane accumulated volume was greater with the 0-100 and 75-25, followed by the 100-0, with 286.23, 286.40, and 225.48 NmL CH4, respectively. Methane yield was higher with 100-0 and 75-25 with 28.27 and 22.77 NmL CH4 g-1volatile solids, respectively. The Gompertz bacterial growthmodel showed that the micro-organisms adaptation periodin vinasses was longer than in bovine manure. Co-digestionof vinasses and bovine manure in proportion 75-25 % improvedthe methane production by 26.7 % with respect to the digestion of vinasses alone, and reduced the adaptation timeof bacteria to vinasses by 4.12 days.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotecnia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotecnia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18633/biotecnia.v24i2.1501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotecnia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18633/biotecnia.v24i2.1501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了梅斯卡尔葡萄与牛粪共消化产甲烷的最佳配比。比较了5种不同比例(v/v)的葡萄和牛粪混合物:25-75、50-50、75-25、100-0和0-100,共6个重复。反应器采用密封的496 mL玻璃容器,活性体积为300 mL,在中温条件下(36±1℃)持续10天。测定了葡萄、牛粪及其混合物的pH值、总固形物和挥发性固形物。0-100和75-25阶段甲烷累积体积最大,100-0阶段次之,分别为286.23、286.40和225.48 NmL CH4。CH4 g-1挥发性固体浓度为28.27和22.77 NmL时,100-0和75-25的甲烷产率较高。Gompertz细菌生长模型表明,葡萄中的微生物适应周期比牛粪中的长。与单独消化葡萄酸相比,以75 ~ 25%的比例共消化葡萄酸和牛粪可使甲烷产量提高26.7%,使细菌对葡萄酸的适应时间缩短4.12 d。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uso de vinazas de mezcal para producir metano por co-digestión con estiércol de bovino
The best co-digestion ratio between mezcal vinasses and bovine manure was investigated to produce methane.Five vinasses and bovine manure mixtures in different proportionswere compared (v/v): 25-75, 50-50, 75-25, 100-0, and 0-100, with six replications. As reactors, 496 mL glasscontainers with hermetic seal were used, with 300 mL of active volume under mesophilic conditions (36 ± 1 oC) for 10 days. The pH, total solids, and volatile solids of vinasses,bovine manure, and their mixtures were determined in triplicate.The methane accumulated volume was greater with the 0-100 and 75-25, followed by the 100-0, with 286.23, 286.40, and 225.48 NmL CH4, respectively. Methane yield was higher with 100-0 and 75-25 with 28.27 and 22.77 NmL CH4 g-1volatile solids, respectively. The Gompertz bacterial growthmodel showed that the micro-organisms adaptation periodin vinasses was longer than in bovine manure. Co-digestionof vinasses and bovine manure in proportion 75-25 % improvedthe methane production by 26.7 % with respect to the digestion of vinasses alone, and reduced the adaptation timeof bacteria to vinasses by 4.12 days.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biotecnia
Biotecnia BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Percepción y uso de la medicina herbaria en Hermosillo, Sonora (noroeste de México) Efecto de la UV-C en la calidad postcosecha de cítricos de la región nororiente del Valle del Cauca, Colombia Actividad antioxidante y antimicrobiana in vitro e in silico de extractos etanólicos de hojas de Cnidoscolus chayamansa Tierra de diatomea y Bauveria bassiana en matrices de alcohol polivinilico, un efecto combinado para el control de Pieris brassicae Aplicación foliar suplementaria de Boro, Manganeso y Molibdeno como inductores de crecimiento, rendimiento y concentración de fitoquímicos en el cultivo de tomate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1