Erynn Masi de Casanova,《尘埃与尊严:当代厄瓜多尔的国内就业》(纽约伊萨卡和伦敦:康奈尔大学出版社,2019年),第xi+174页,20.99英镑。

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q2 AREA STUDIES 拉丁美洲研究 Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1017/S0022216X22000785
D. Cherubini
{"title":"Erynn Masi de Casanova,《尘埃与尊严:当代厄瓜多尔的国内就业》(纽约伊萨卡和伦敦:康奈尔大学出版社,2019年),第xi+174页,20.99英镑。","authors":"D. Cherubini","doi":"10.1017/S0022216X22000785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and festive component, whose main function was to reassert egalitarian relations between the two nations (p. 93). During the 1840s, prompted by aspirations of capital expansion and racist civilising discourses against Indigenous savagery, Chilean authorities transformed parlamentos, from diplomatic instances to meetings with compliant Mapuche leaders where treaties with conditions set by Chilean governments were signed. As Herr convincingly argues, the new treaties justified the military invasion of Wallmapu not as a war of conquest that would require peace agreements and future reparations, but as the appeasement of borderlands ideally followed by concessions to Indigenous people under the terms and conditions set by the state, such as the limited recognition of land ownership rights within the small space of reservations (reducciones). Rolf Foerster’s ¿Pactos de sumisión o actos de rebelión? (Pehuén, 2018) and Fernando Pairican’s Toqui: Guerra y tradición en el siglo XIX (Pehuén, 2020)−monographs on Indigenous-state relations not available at the time of writing of Contested Nation− focus on how Mapuche customary diplomacy was deployed in response to the increasingly aggressive and authoritarian stance of Chilean governments. These works open the possibility that, while the signing of treaties entailed an overall Mapuche submission to the Chilean state, negotiations with future conquerors provided the means through which the Mapuche population ensured its cultural survival, threatened by the prospect of extermination and animated claims of autonomy and self-governance that would later in the twentieth century inspire the consolidation of a large and diverse Mapuche social movement. Beyond the success of Chilean violent colonisation, can Mapuche diplomatic engagement with the Chilean state also reveal a possible failure of the nineteenth-century Chilean elite’s project of complete assimilation and eradication of Mapuche anticolonial aspiration? (See Pairican, Toqui (2020), p. 281.) Herr’s book points to the possibility of a new way of thinking about diplomacy and colonial violence in the nineteenth century that will continue to catch the attention of historians of state formation in Latin America.","PeriodicalId":51630,"journal":{"name":"拉丁美洲研究","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Erynn Masi de Casanova, Dust and Dignity: Domestic Employment in Contemporary Ecuador (Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 2019), pp. xi + 174, £20.99 pb.\",\"authors\":\"D. Cherubini\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0022216X22000785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"and festive component, whose main function was to reassert egalitarian relations between the two nations (p. 93). During the 1840s, prompted by aspirations of capital expansion and racist civilising discourses against Indigenous savagery, Chilean authorities transformed parlamentos, from diplomatic instances to meetings with compliant Mapuche leaders where treaties with conditions set by Chilean governments were signed. As Herr convincingly argues, the new treaties justified the military invasion of Wallmapu not as a war of conquest that would require peace agreements and future reparations, but as the appeasement of borderlands ideally followed by concessions to Indigenous people under the terms and conditions set by the state, such as the limited recognition of land ownership rights within the small space of reservations (reducciones). Rolf Foerster’s ¿Pactos de sumisión o actos de rebelión? (Pehuén, 2018) and Fernando Pairican’s Toqui: Guerra y tradición en el siglo XIX (Pehuén, 2020)−monographs on Indigenous-state relations not available at the time of writing of Contested Nation− focus on how Mapuche customary diplomacy was deployed in response to the increasingly aggressive and authoritarian stance of Chilean governments. These works open the possibility that, while the signing of treaties entailed an overall Mapuche submission to the Chilean state, negotiations with future conquerors provided the means through which the Mapuche population ensured its cultural survival, threatened by the prospect of extermination and animated claims of autonomy and self-governance that would later in the twentieth century inspire the consolidation of a large and diverse Mapuche social movement. Beyond the success of Chilean violent colonisation, can Mapuche diplomatic engagement with the Chilean state also reveal a possible failure of the nineteenth-century Chilean elite’s project of complete assimilation and eradication of Mapuche anticolonial aspiration? (See Pairican, Toqui (2020), p. 281.) Herr’s book points to the possibility of a new way of thinking about diplomacy and colonial violence in the nineteenth century that will continue to catch the attention of historians of state formation in Latin America.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"拉丁美洲研究\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"拉丁美洲研究\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X22000785\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"拉丁美洲研究","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X22000785","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

节日部分,其主要功能是重申两国之间的平等关系(第93页)。19世纪40年代,在资本扩张的愿望和反对土著野蛮的种族主义文明言论的推动下,智利当局将议会从外交场合转变为与顺从的马普切领导人会面,在那里签署了符合智利政府规定条件的条约。正如Herr令人信服地指出的那样,新条约证明对Wallmapu的军事入侵不是一场需要和平协议和未来赔偿的征服战争,而是对边境地区的绥靖,理想情况下是在国家规定的条款和条件下向土著人民让步,例如在保留的小范围内有限地承认土地所有权(减少)。Rolf Foerster的Pactos de sumisión o actos de rebelión?(Pehuén,2018)和Fernando Pairican的Toqui:Guerra y tradición en el siglo XIX(Pehuèn,2020)——在撰写《竞争民族》时还没有关于土著国家关系的专著——重点关注马普切人的习惯外交是如何应对智利政府日益咄咄逼人和独裁的立场的。这些作品开启了一种可能性,即虽然条约的签署意味着马普切人全面臣服于智利国家,但与未来征服者的谈判提供了马普切人民确保其文化生存的手段,受到灭绝前景的威胁,以及对自治和自治的积极主张,这些主张将在20世纪晚些时候激发一场大规模和多样化的马普切社会运动的巩固。除了智利暴力殖民的成功之外,马普切人与智利政府的外交接触是否也揭示了19世纪智利精英完全同化和根除马普切反殖民愿望的项目可能失败?(见Pairican,Toqui(2020),第281页。)Herr的书指出了一种新的思考十九世纪外交和殖民暴力的方式的可能性,这种方式将继续引起拉丁美洲国家形成历史学家的注意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Erynn Masi de Casanova, Dust and Dignity: Domestic Employment in Contemporary Ecuador (Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 2019), pp. xi + 174, £20.99 pb.
and festive component, whose main function was to reassert egalitarian relations between the two nations (p. 93). During the 1840s, prompted by aspirations of capital expansion and racist civilising discourses against Indigenous savagery, Chilean authorities transformed parlamentos, from diplomatic instances to meetings with compliant Mapuche leaders where treaties with conditions set by Chilean governments were signed. As Herr convincingly argues, the new treaties justified the military invasion of Wallmapu not as a war of conquest that would require peace agreements and future reparations, but as the appeasement of borderlands ideally followed by concessions to Indigenous people under the terms and conditions set by the state, such as the limited recognition of land ownership rights within the small space of reservations (reducciones). Rolf Foerster’s ¿Pactos de sumisión o actos de rebelión? (Pehuén, 2018) and Fernando Pairican’s Toqui: Guerra y tradición en el siglo XIX (Pehuén, 2020)−monographs on Indigenous-state relations not available at the time of writing of Contested Nation− focus on how Mapuche customary diplomacy was deployed in response to the increasingly aggressive and authoritarian stance of Chilean governments. These works open the possibility that, while the signing of treaties entailed an overall Mapuche submission to the Chilean state, negotiations with future conquerors provided the means through which the Mapuche population ensured its cultural survival, threatened by the prospect of extermination and animated claims of autonomy and self-governance that would later in the twentieth century inspire the consolidation of a large and diverse Mapuche social movement. Beyond the success of Chilean violent colonisation, can Mapuche diplomatic engagement with the Chilean state also reveal a possible failure of the nineteenth-century Chilean elite’s project of complete assimilation and eradication of Mapuche anticolonial aspiration? (See Pairican, Toqui (2020), p. 281.) Herr’s book points to the possibility of a new way of thinking about diplomacy and colonial violence in the nineteenth century that will continue to catch the attention of historians of state formation in Latin America.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
拉丁美洲研究
拉丁美洲研究 Multiple-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3870
期刊介绍: Journal of Latin American Studies presents recent research in the field of Latin American studies in economics, geography, politics, international relations, sociology, social anthropology, economic history and cultural history. Regular features include articles on contemporary themes, specially commissioned commentaries and an extensive section of book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Global Mariátegui Jonathan D. Rosen and Hanna S. Kassab (eds.), Corruption in the Americas Lexington Books, 2020, pp. 164 When Does Lethal Repression Fail? Unarmed Militancy and Backfire in Bolivia, 1982–2021 The Promise and Peril of the Popular: Interpretations of Nineteenth-Century Popular Liberalism in Mexico The Promise and Peril of the Popular: Interpretations of Nineteenth-Century Popular Liberalism in Mexico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1