Jahezon重症护理教育方案效果评价的准实验研究

N. Alreshidi, Afaf M. Alrimali, Wadida Alshammari, Debora Tabungar, Michelle Garcia, Kristine Gonzales, F. Gaspar
{"title":"Jahezon重症护理教育方案效果评价的准实验研究","authors":"N. Alreshidi, Afaf M. Alrimali, Wadida Alshammari, Debora Tabungar, Michelle Garcia, Kristine Gonzales, F. Gaspar","doi":"10.5430/jnep.v13n10p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Competent and trained nurses are essential for critical care preparedness. This study assesses the impact of an educational training program (Jahezon) on the participants' critical care knowledge by comparing their pre- and post-knowledge outcomes.Methods: This study used a quasi-experimental one-group pre-test-post-test design to examine the impact of 40 days of theoretical and practical training on 43 selected nurses from 16 hospitals located in the Hai’l Health cluster, situated in the city of Hai’l, Saudi Arabia. The training program started on November 2021, the curriculum covered a comprehensive range of critical care nursing concepts and was divided into four phases. The instrument used to assess knowledge was a 50-item multiple-choice questionnaire, which was administered as a pre-test, post-test, and a 6-month follow-up test format. The data were analyzed using SPSS v29.0.Results: The mean total scores were the highest in the follow up test (M = 9.87, SD = 2.34), followed by the post-test (M = 7.57, SD = 0.98) and the pre-test (M = 5.91, SD = 1.06), showing a statistically significant difference (F(2, 117) = 64.834, p < .001). From the pre-test to the post-test, 93% of the total scores improved. The only demographic factor that affected the test scores was gender, with female nurses scoring higher.Conclusions: The nurses' knowledge improved significantly after their participation in the critical care training program, but more research is needed to determine their actual performance in caring for critically ill patients during a pandemic.","PeriodicalId":73866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing education and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the efficacy of Jahezon's educational program on critical nursing care: A quasi-experimental study\",\"authors\":\"N. Alreshidi, Afaf M. Alrimali, Wadida Alshammari, Debora Tabungar, Michelle Garcia, Kristine Gonzales, F. Gaspar\",\"doi\":\"10.5430/jnep.v13n10p1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Competent and trained nurses are essential for critical care preparedness. This study assesses the impact of an educational training program (Jahezon) on the participants' critical care knowledge by comparing their pre- and post-knowledge outcomes.Methods: This study used a quasi-experimental one-group pre-test-post-test design to examine the impact of 40 days of theoretical and practical training on 43 selected nurses from 16 hospitals located in the Hai’l Health cluster, situated in the city of Hai’l, Saudi Arabia. The training program started on November 2021, the curriculum covered a comprehensive range of critical care nursing concepts and was divided into four phases. The instrument used to assess knowledge was a 50-item multiple-choice questionnaire, which was administered as a pre-test, post-test, and a 6-month follow-up test format. The data were analyzed using SPSS v29.0.Results: The mean total scores were the highest in the follow up test (M = 9.87, SD = 2.34), followed by the post-test (M = 7.57, SD = 0.98) and the pre-test (M = 5.91, SD = 1.06), showing a statistically significant difference (F(2, 117) = 64.834, p < .001). From the pre-test to the post-test, 93% of the total scores improved. The only demographic factor that affected the test scores was gender, with female nurses scoring higher.Conclusions: The nurses' knowledge improved significantly after their participation in the critical care training program, but more research is needed to determine their actual performance in caring for critically ill patients during a pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nursing education and practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nursing education and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v13n10p1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing education and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v13n10p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:合格且训练有素的护士对做好重症监护准备至关重要。本研究通过比较参与者在知识前和知识后的结果,评估了教育培训计划(Jahezon)对他们重症监护知识的影响。方法:本研究采用准实验性的一组测试前-测试后设计,对来自沙特阿拉伯海市海健康集群16家医院的43名护士进行了为期40天的理论和实践培训。培训计划于2021年11月开始,课程涵盖了一系列全面的重症护理概念,分为四个阶段。用于评估知识的工具是一份50项多项选择问卷,以测试前、测试后和6个月的后续测试形式进行。使用SPSS v29.0对数据进行分析。结果:平均总分在随访测试中最高(M=9.87,SD=2.34),其次是测试后(M=7.57,SD=0.98)和测试前(M=5.91,SD=1.06),显示出统计学上的显著差异(F(2117)=64.834,p<.001)。从测试前到测试后,93%的总分得到改善。影响考试成绩的唯一人口因素是性别,女护士的得分更高。结论:参加重症监护培训项目后,护士的知识显著提高,但还需要更多的研究来确定他们在疫情期间照顾重症患者的实际表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the efficacy of Jahezon's educational program on critical nursing care: A quasi-experimental study
Objective: Competent and trained nurses are essential for critical care preparedness. This study assesses the impact of an educational training program (Jahezon) on the participants' critical care knowledge by comparing their pre- and post-knowledge outcomes.Methods: This study used a quasi-experimental one-group pre-test-post-test design to examine the impact of 40 days of theoretical and practical training on 43 selected nurses from 16 hospitals located in the Hai’l Health cluster, situated in the city of Hai’l, Saudi Arabia. The training program started on November 2021, the curriculum covered a comprehensive range of critical care nursing concepts and was divided into four phases. The instrument used to assess knowledge was a 50-item multiple-choice questionnaire, which was administered as a pre-test, post-test, and a 6-month follow-up test format. The data were analyzed using SPSS v29.0.Results: The mean total scores were the highest in the follow up test (M = 9.87, SD = 2.34), followed by the post-test (M = 7.57, SD = 0.98) and the pre-test (M = 5.91, SD = 1.06), showing a statistically significant difference (F(2, 117) = 64.834, p < .001). From the pre-test to the post-test, 93% of the total scores improved. The only demographic factor that affected the test scores was gender, with female nurses scoring higher.Conclusions: The nurses' knowledge improved significantly after their participation in the critical care training program, but more research is needed to determine their actual performance in caring for critically ill patients during a pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“What are we doing here?”: Reflections on developing a transcultural “Road Map” for global menstrual hygiene management Analysis of nurses’ intention to resign and its reasons in a tertiary Grade-A hospital in Beijing during the post-pandemic era Utilizing learning communities to enhance classroom and clinical synergy across the curriculum Contraceptive use in the Gaza Strip: A systematic review Supporting graduate students’ skills with simulated experiences in a professional foundation course
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1