未来的业务和采购和供应管理的角色:“不像往常一样的业务”PSM研究的机会

IF 6.8 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pursup.2022.100753
Louise Knight , Wendy Tate , Steven Carnovale , Carmela Di Mauro , Lydia Bals , Federico Caniato , Jury Gualandris , Thomas Johnsen , Aristides Matopoulos , Joanne Meehan , Joe Miemczyk , Andrea S. Patrucco , Tobias Schoenherr , Kostas Selviaridis , Anne Touboulic , Stephan M. Wagner
{"title":"未来的业务和采购和供应管理的角色:“不像往常一样的业务”PSM研究的机会","authors":"Louise Knight ,&nbsp;Wendy Tate ,&nbsp;Steven Carnovale ,&nbsp;Carmela Di Mauro ,&nbsp;Lydia Bals ,&nbsp;Federico Caniato ,&nbsp;Jury Gualandris ,&nbsp;Thomas Johnsen ,&nbsp;Aristides Matopoulos ,&nbsp;Joanne Meehan ,&nbsp;Joe Miemczyk ,&nbsp;Andrea S. Patrucco ,&nbsp;Tobias Schoenherr ,&nbsp;Kostas Selviaridis ,&nbsp;Anne Touboulic ,&nbsp;Stephan M. Wagner","doi":"10.1016/j.pursup.2022.100753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The raison d'être for this article is simple: traditional ways of researching, theorizing, and practicing purchasing and supply management (PSM) are no longer sufficient to ‘meet the moment’. Scholars need to advance a “business-not-as-usual” footing approach to their work, if they are to make a meaningful contribution to addressing the current and future emergencies, as highlighted by recent extreme weather and the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, what can this, or should this, mean for a field rooted in traditional business thinking? This article builds on the Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management's (JPSM) 25th Anniversary Special Issue editorial (2019); members of the JPSM's editorial team advance their unique perspectives on what “business-not-as-usual” means for PSM. Specifically, we advocate both thinking much more widely, in scope and ambition, than we currently do, and simultaneously building our ability to comprehend supply chains in a more nuanced and granular way. We explore whether the bias toward positivist work has omitted potentially interesting findings, and viewpoints. This leads to a call to re-think <em>how</em> we approach our work: should the key criteria <em>always</em> be to focus on theory development or testing? Should academics “think bigger”? Turning to specific research themes, illustrations of how our current thinking can be challenged or broadened by addressing the circular economy, and role of purchasing and innovation. Specifically, the focus on the PSM function as an intrapreneur within the larger organization, and the role of innovation and technology in PSM work. Taken together, we hope the ideas and arguments presented here will inform and inspire ambitious and novel approaches to PSM research with significant and enduring impact on the transformation of business.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47950,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management","volume":"28 1","pages":"Article 100753"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1478409222000085/pdfft?md5=3b177be91199ec9cddbc7c3b8688bd5a&pid=1-s2.0-S1478409222000085-main.pdf","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Future business and the role of purchasing and supply management: Opportunities for ‘business-not-as-usual’ PSM research\",\"authors\":\"Louise Knight ,&nbsp;Wendy Tate ,&nbsp;Steven Carnovale ,&nbsp;Carmela Di Mauro ,&nbsp;Lydia Bals ,&nbsp;Federico Caniato ,&nbsp;Jury Gualandris ,&nbsp;Thomas Johnsen ,&nbsp;Aristides Matopoulos ,&nbsp;Joanne Meehan ,&nbsp;Joe Miemczyk ,&nbsp;Andrea S. Patrucco ,&nbsp;Tobias Schoenherr ,&nbsp;Kostas Selviaridis ,&nbsp;Anne Touboulic ,&nbsp;Stephan M. Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pursup.2022.100753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The raison d'être for this article is simple: traditional ways of researching, theorizing, and practicing purchasing and supply management (PSM) are no longer sufficient to ‘meet the moment’. Scholars need to advance a “business-not-as-usual” footing approach to their work, if they are to make a meaningful contribution to addressing the current and future emergencies, as highlighted by recent extreme weather and the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, what can this, or should this, mean for a field rooted in traditional business thinking? This article builds on the Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management's (JPSM) 25th Anniversary Special Issue editorial (2019); members of the JPSM's editorial team advance their unique perspectives on what “business-not-as-usual” means for PSM. Specifically, we advocate both thinking much more widely, in scope and ambition, than we currently do, and simultaneously building our ability to comprehend supply chains in a more nuanced and granular way. We explore whether the bias toward positivist work has omitted potentially interesting findings, and viewpoints. This leads to a call to re-think <em>how</em> we approach our work: should the key criteria <em>always</em> be to focus on theory development or testing? Should academics “think bigger”? Turning to specific research themes, illustrations of how our current thinking can be challenged or broadened by addressing the circular economy, and role of purchasing and innovation. Specifically, the focus on the PSM function as an intrapreneur within the larger organization, and the role of innovation and technology in PSM work. Taken together, we hope the ideas and arguments presented here will inform and inspire ambitious and novel approaches to PSM research with significant and enduring impact on the transformation of business.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100753\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1478409222000085/pdfft?md5=3b177be91199ec9cddbc7c3b8688bd5a&pid=1-s2.0-S1478409222000085-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1478409222000085\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1478409222000085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

本文之所以在être上发表的原因很简单:传统的采购与供应管理(PSM)的研究、理论化和实践方式已不足以满足当前的需求。正如最近的极端天气和COVID-19大流行所突显的那样,如果学者们想要为应对当前和未来的紧急情况做出有意义的贡献,就需要在他们的工作中推进一种“不照旧”的立足方式。然而,对于一个植根于传统商业思维的领域来说,这可能意味着什么,或者应该意味着什么?本文以《采购与供应管理杂志》(JPSM) 25周年特刊社论(2019)为基础;JPSM的编辑团队成员提出了他们独特的观点,“不像往常一样的业务”对PSM意味着什么。具体来说,我们提倡在范围和抱负上比目前更广泛地思考,同时建立我们以更细致、更细粒度的方式理解供应链的能力。我们探讨对实证主义工作的偏见是否忽略了潜在的有趣的发现和观点。这促使我们重新思考我们的工作方式:关键标准应该始终是关注理论发展还是测试?学者们是否应该“想得更长远”?转向具体的研究主题,说明如何通过解决循环经济,以及采购和创新的作用来挑战或拓宽我们当前的思维。具体来说,重点是PSM在更大的组织中作为内部企业家的功能,以及创新和技术在PSM工作中的作用。综上所述,我们希望这里提出的观点和论点将为PSM研究提供信息和启发,并对业务转型产生重大而持久的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Future business and the role of purchasing and supply management: Opportunities for ‘business-not-as-usual’ PSM research

The raison d'être for this article is simple: traditional ways of researching, theorizing, and practicing purchasing and supply management (PSM) are no longer sufficient to ‘meet the moment’. Scholars need to advance a “business-not-as-usual” footing approach to their work, if they are to make a meaningful contribution to addressing the current and future emergencies, as highlighted by recent extreme weather and the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, what can this, or should this, mean for a field rooted in traditional business thinking? This article builds on the Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management's (JPSM) 25th Anniversary Special Issue editorial (2019); members of the JPSM's editorial team advance their unique perspectives on what “business-not-as-usual” means for PSM. Specifically, we advocate both thinking much more widely, in scope and ambition, than we currently do, and simultaneously building our ability to comprehend supply chains in a more nuanced and granular way. We explore whether the bias toward positivist work has omitted potentially interesting findings, and viewpoints. This leads to a call to re-think how we approach our work: should the key criteria always be to focus on theory development or testing? Should academics “think bigger”? Turning to specific research themes, illustrations of how our current thinking can be challenged or broadened by addressing the circular economy, and role of purchasing and innovation. Specifically, the focus on the PSM function as an intrapreneur within the larger organization, and the role of innovation and technology in PSM work. Taken together, we hope the ideas and arguments presented here will inform and inspire ambitious and novel approaches to PSM research with significant and enduring impact on the transformation of business.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
18.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management is to publish original, high-quality research within the field of purchasing and supply management (PSM). Articles should have a significant impact on PSM theory and practice. The Journal ensures that high quality research is collected and disseminated widely to both academics and practitioners, and provides a forum for debate. It covers all subjects relating to the purchase and supply of goods and services in industry, commerce, local, national, and regional government, health and transportation.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board From checking the box to driving impact – Perspectives on how to develop a supplier diversity program that is less narrowly scoped and more wholeheartedly adopted The circular business models of third-party loop operators: An activity-based view on performing activities internally or externally Establishing buyer-supplier self-organization through LSP brokered learning and information technologies: The effects on relational performance in logistic service triads Closing the loop: The fundamental role of Purchasing and Supply Management in reaching a circular economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1