{"title":"拼贴制图","authors":"Tatsiana Zhurauliova","doi":"10.1086/712751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beginning in about 1943, the search for a suitable model for capturing the sphere of the Earth on a two-dimensional map grew into an expansive cultural project of imaging space as a dynamic field of strategic information available at one’s fingertips. Whether in periodicals, such as Life and Fortune magazines or the New York Times; specialized publications, such as Look at the World or War Atlas for Americans; or in the galleries of the Museum of Modern Art, Americans were urged to consider cartographic representation as a step to developing a comprehensive yet flexible understanding of global space. This article considers two trends in map production at the time: dynamic fragmentation as a means of communicating the shifting parameters of strategic relationships, and innovative designs that stimulate an active and prolonged perceptual process. Drawing on this evidence, I outline a paradigmatic shift in the American spatial imagination that becomes contingent on the relationship between the map and the beholder. The article offers examples of specific instances of cultural production that were informed by this discursive shift, while also arguing for its lasting effect on postwar American art.","PeriodicalId":43434,"journal":{"name":"American Art","volume":"34 1","pages":"72 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/712751","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cartography as Collage/Collage as Cartography\",\"authors\":\"Tatsiana Zhurauliova\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/712751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Beginning in about 1943, the search for a suitable model for capturing the sphere of the Earth on a two-dimensional map grew into an expansive cultural project of imaging space as a dynamic field of strategic information available at one’s fingertips. Whether in periodicals, such as Life and Fortune magazines or the New York Times; specialized publications, such as Look at the World or War Atlas for Americans; or in the galleries of the Museum of Modern Art, Americans were urged to consider cartographic representation as a step to developing a comprehensive yet flexible understanding of global space. This article considers two trends in map production at the time: dynamic fragmentation as a means of communicating the shifting parameters of strategic relationships, and innovative designs that stimulate an active and prolonged perceptual process. Drawing on this evidence, I outline a paradigmatic shift in the American spatial imagination that becomes contingent on the relationship between the map and the beholder. The article offers examples of specific instances of cultural production that were informed by this discursive shift, while also arguing for its lasting effect on postwar American art.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Art\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"72 - 91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/712751\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Art\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/712751\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/712751","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beginning in about 1943, the search for a suitable model for capturing the sphere of the Earth on a two-dimensional map grew into an expansive cultural project of imaging space as a dynamic field of strategic information available at one’s fingertips. Whether in periodicals, such as Life and Fortune magazines or the New York Times; specialized publications, such as Look at the World or War Atlas for Americans; or in the galleries of the Museum of Modern Art, Americans were urged to consider cartographic representation as a step to developing a comprehensive yet flexible understanding of global space. This article considers two trends in map production at the time: dynamic fragmentation as a means of communicating the shifting parameters of strategic relationships, and innovative designs that stimulate an active and prolonged perceptual process. Drawing on this evidence, I outline a paradigmatic shift in the American spatial imagination that becomes contingent on the relationship between the map and the beholder. The article offers examples of specific instances of cultural production that were informed by this discursive shift, while also arguing for its lasting effect on postwar American art.
期刊介绍:
American Art is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to exploring all aspects of the nation"s visual heritage from colonial to contemporary times. Through a broad interdisciplinary approach, American Art provides an understanding not only of specific artists and art objects, but also of the cultural factors that have shaped American art over three centuries of national experience. The fine arts are the journal"s primary focus, but its scope encompasses all aspects of the nation"s visual culture, including popular culture, public art, film, electronic multimedia, and decorative arts and crafts. American Art embraces all methods of investigation to explore America·s rich and diverse artistic legacy, from traditional formalism to analyses of social context.