评论:将我们的情感凝聚在一起:共情的核心是共同的表征

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Emotion Review Pub Date : 2022-06-07 DOI:10.1177/17540739221107029
A. Marsh
{"title":"评论:将我们的情感凝聚在一起:共情的核心是共同的表征","authors":"A. Marsh","doi":"10.1177/17540739221107029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empathy is a construct that is notoriously difficult to define. Murphy and colleagues (2022) argue for leaning into the construct's inherent fuzziness and reverting to what they term a classical definition informed by the observations of philosophers and clinicians: as a dynamic, “unfolding process of imaginatively experiencing the subjective consciousness of another person, sensing, understanding, and structuring the world as if one were that person.” Although consistent with some historical conceptualizations, this definition risks incorporating so many processes it would make empathy difficult to operationalize or distinguish from any generally socially sensitive interaction. Defining empathy instead as the attempted representation, or simulation, of another's subjective internal experiences (whether sensory, affective, or cognitive) would increase its clarity and empirical utility.","PeriodicalId":48064,"journal":{"name":"Emotion Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"184 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comment: Getting Our Affect Together: Shared Representations as the Core of Empathy\",\"authors\":\"A. Marsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17540739221107029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Empathy is a construct that is notoriously difficult to define. Murphy and colleagues (2022) argue for leaning into the construct's inherent fuzziness and reverting to what they term a classical definition informed by the observations of philosophers and clinicians: as a dynamic, “unfolding process of imaginatively experiencing the subjective consciousness of another person, sensing, understanding, and structuring the world as if one were that person.” Although consistent with some historical conceptualizations, this definition risks incorporating so many processes it would make empathy difficult to operationalize or distinguish from any generally socially sensitive interaction. Defining empathy instead as the attempted representation, or simulation, of another's subjective internal experiences (whether sensory, affective, or cognitive) would increase its clarity and empirical utility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emotion Review\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"184 - 187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emotion Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739221107029\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotion Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739221107029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

同理心是一个众所周知的难以定义的概念。Murphy及其同事(2022)主张倾向于该结构固有的模糊性,并回归他们所称的哲学家和临床医生的观察所提供的经典定义:作为一个动态的、“展开的过程,想象性地体验另一个人的主观意识,感知、理解和构建世界,就好像一个人就是那个人一样。“尽管与一些历史概念一致,但这一定义有可能包含太多的过程,这将使同理心难以操作或与任何普遍对社会敏感的互动区分开来。相反,将移情定义为对他人主观内部体验(无论是感官、情感还是认知)的尝试表征或模拟,将增加其清晰度和经验效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comment: Getting Our Affect Together: Shared Representations as the Core of Empathy
Empathy is a construct that is notoriously difficult to define. Murphy and colleagues (2022) argue for leaning into the construct's inherent fuzziness and reverting to what they term a classical definition informed by the observations of philosophers and clinicians: as a dynamic, “unfolding process of imaginatively experiencing the subjective consciousness of another person, sensing, understanding, and structuring the world as if one were that person.” Although consistent with some historical conceptualizations, this definition risks incorporating so many processes it would make empathy difficult to operationalize or distinguish from any generally socially sensitive interaction. Defining empathy instead as the attempted representation, or simulation, of another's subjective internal experiences (whether sensory, affective, or cognitive) would increase its clarity and empirical utility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emotion Review
Emotion Review PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Emotion Review is a fully peer reviewed scholarly journal. It adheres to a blinded peer review process in which the reviewer"s name is routinely withheld from the author unless the reviewer requests a preference for their identity to be revealed. All manuscripts are reviewed initially by the Editors and only those papers that meet the scientific and editorial standards of the journal, and fit within the aims and scope of the journal, will be sent for outside review. Emotion Review will focus on ideas about emotion, with "emotion" broadly defined. The Review will publish articles presenting new theories, offering conceptual analyses, reviewing the literature, and debating and critiquing conceptual issues.
期刊最新文献
The Need for New Perspectives on Arousal in Emotion Theory Yearning for the Irretrievable: Nostalgia and Time Curiosity and the Regulation of Affective Memory On the Nature of Nostalgia: A Psychological Perspective Is “Arousal,” as a Scientific Concept, Worse than Useless?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1