太热不能小跑?澳大利亚马主人如何应对重大天气事件

IF 1.1 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Rural Society Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10371656.2018.1441854
K. Thompson, L. Clarkson, M. Rebbeck
{"title":"太热不能小跑?澳大利亚马主人如何应对重大天气事件","authors":"K. Thompson, L. Clarkson, M. Rebbeck","doi":"10.1080/10371656.2018.1441854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article commences by outlining five perspectives on the sustainability of equestrian cultures covering the environment, the economy, human health, horse welfare, and social licence. Next, it presents findings from an online survey developed to understand how horse owners in Australia have been affected by major weather and climate events, how they responded in the short and long term, their considerations for the future, and the support they might require. Sixty-nine horse owners participated. Most (90%) reported being affected by major weather/climate event(s) in the last 10–20 years, four out of five (78%) took action at the time of the event and a similar proportion (80%) had taken actions for the longer term. Most (86%) had thought about preparations for future events, but had not yet taken any action, due to lack of time, money, materials, or storage. Almost all participants (93%) perceived a need for education, research, government policy. Since findings suggest horse owners may be less likely to engage with climate adaptation and sustainable horse keeping public education initiatives when they are related specifically to “climate change”, and more likely to engage when they are related to “land care, pasture management and improvement”, and “horse health and welfare”, an alternative rhetoric is recommended.","PeriodicalId":45685,"journal":{"name":"Rural Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10371656.2018.1441854","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Too hot to trot? How horse owners in Australia have responded to major weather events\",\"authors\":\"K. Thompson, L. Clarkson, M. Rebbeck\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10371656.2018.1441854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article commences by outlining five perspectives on the sustainability of equestrian cultures covering the environment, the economy, human health, horse welfare, and social licence. Next, it presents findings from an online survey developed to understand how horse owners in Australia have been affected by major weather and climate events, how they responded in the short and long term, their considerations for the future, and the support they might require. Sixty-nine horse owners participated. Most (90%) reported being affected by major weather/climate event(s) in the last 10–20 years, four out of five (78%) took action at the time of the event and a similar proportion (80%) had taken actions for the longer term. Most (86%) had thought about preparations for future events, but had not yet taken any action, due to lack of time, money, materials, or storage. Almost all participants (93%) perceived a need for education, research, government policy. Since findings suggest horse owners may be less likely to engage with climate adaptation and sustainable horse keeping public education initiatives when they are related specifically to “climate change”, and more likely to engage when they are related to “land care, pasture management and improvement”, and “horse health and welfare”, an alternative rhetoric is recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rural Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10371656.2018.1441854\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rural Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10371656.2018.1441854\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10371656.2018.1441854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要本文首先概述了马术文化可持续性的五个视角,包括环境、经济、人类健康、马匹福利和社会许可。接下来,它介绍了一项在线调查的结果,该调查旨在了解澳大利亚的马主人如何受到重大天气和气候事件的影响,他们在短期和长期内的反应,他们对未来的考虑,以及他们可能需要的支持。六十九位马主参加了比赛。大多数(90%)报告在过去10-20年中受到重大天气/气候事件的影响,五分之四(78%)的人在事件发生时采取了行动,类似比例(80%)的人采取了长期行动。大多数人(86%)考虑过为未来的活动做准备,但由于缺乏时间、金钱、材料或储存,尚未采取任何行动。几乎所有参与者(93%)都认为需要教育、研究和政府政策。由于研究结果表明,当马主人与“气候变化”具体相关时,他们可能不太可能参与气候适应和可持续养马公共教育倡议,而当它们与“土地护理、牧场管理和改善”以及“马的健康和福利”相关时,则更有可能参与,因此建议采用另一种措辞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Too hot to trot? How horse owners in Australia have responded to major weather events
ABSTRACT This article commences by outlining five perspectives on the sustainability of equestrian cultures covering the environment, the economy, human health, horse welfare, and social licence. Next, it presents findings from an online survey developed to understand how horse owners in Australia have been affected by major weather and climate events, how they responded in the short and long term, their considerations for the future, and the support they might require. Sixty-nine horse owners participated. Most (90%) reported being affected by major weather/climate event(s) in the last 10–20 years, four out of five (78%) took action at the time of the event and a similar proportion (80%) had taken actions for the longer term. Most (86%) had thought about preparations for future events, but had not yet taken any action, due to lack of time, money, materials, or storage. Almost all participants (93%) perceived a need for education, research, government policy. Since findings suggest horse owners may be less likely to engage with climate adaptation and sustainable horse keeping public education initiatives when they are related specifically to “climate change”, and more likely to engage when they are related to “land care, pasture management and improvement”, and “horse health and welfare”, an alternative rhetoric is recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rural Society
Rural Society SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Sustainable Farm Finance: A Practical Guide for Broadacre Graziers Taoid: communal heritage tourism through a multi-stakeholder approach in the Philippines The WEF nexus and rural household security in Zimbabwe and South Africa Visibility and representation of rural schools in the online Spanish press Social quality based on ecotourism and creative economy in a language tourism village in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1