约旦医生对COVID-19患者静脉血栓栓塞风险和管理知识的评估

IF 0.5 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research Pub Date : 2022-06-15 DOI:10.1093/jphsr/rmac021
M. Zaini, R. A. Abu Farha, R. Abutayeh, Wesam Alsaud, A. Hammoudeh, A. Al-Shudifat, Thamer Al-Kharabsheh
{"title":"约旦医生对COVID-19患者静脉血栓栓塞风险和管理知识的评估","authors":"M. Zaini, R. A. Abu Farha, R. Abutayeh, Wesam Alsaud, A. Hammoudeh, A. Al-Shudifat, Thamer Al-Kharabsheh","doi":"10.1093/jphsr/rmac021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The aim of this study was to assess Jordanian physicians’ awareness about venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk among COVID-19 patients and its treatment protocol.\n \n \n \n This was a cross-sectional-based survey that was conducted in Jordan in 2020. During the study period, a convenience sample of physicians working in various Jordanian hospitals were invited to participate in this study. Physicians’ knowledge was evaluated and physicians gained one point for each correct answer. Then, a knowledge score out of 23 was calculated for each.\n \n \n \n In this study, 102 physicians were recruited. Results from this study showed that most of the physicians realize that all COVID-19 patients need VTE risk assessment (n = 69, 67.6%). Regarding VTE prophylaxis, the majority of physicians (n = 91, 89.2%) agreed that low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is the best prophylactic option for mild-moderate COVID-19 patients with high VTE risk. Regarding severe/critically ill COVID-19 patients, 75.5% of physicians (n = 77) recognized that LMWH is the correct prophylactic option in this case, while 80.4% of them (n = 82) knew that mechanical prevention is the preferred prophylactic option for severe/critically ill COVID-19 patients with high bleeding risk. Moreover, 77.5% of physicians (n = 79) knew that LMWH is the treatment of choice for COVID-19 patients diagnosed with VTE. Finally, linear regression analysis showed that consultants had an overall higher knowledge score about VTE prevention and treatment in COVID-19 patients compared with residents (P = 0.009).\n \n \n \n All physicians knew about VTE risk factors for COVID-19 patients. However, consultants showed better awareness of VTE prophylaxis and treatment compared with residents. We recommend educational workshops be conducted to enhance physicians’ knowledge and awareness about VTE thromboprophylaxis and management in COVID-19 patients.\n","PeriodicalId":16705,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Jordanian physicians’ knowledge about venous thromboembolism risk and management among COVID-19 patients\",\"authors\":\"M. Zaini, R. A. Abu Farha, R. Abutayeh, Wesam Alsaud, A. Hammoudeh, A. Al-Shudifat, Thamer Al-Kharabsheh\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jphsr/rmac021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n The aim of this study was to assess Jordanian physicians’ awareness about venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk among COVID-19 patients and its treatment protocol.\\n \\n \\n \\n This was a cross-sectional-based survey that was conducted in Jordan in 2020. During the study period, a convenience sample of physicians working in various Jordanian hospitals were invited to participate in this study. Physicians’ knowledge was evaluated and physicians gained one point for each correct answer. Then, a knowledge score out of 23 was calculated for each.\\n \\n \\n \\n In this study, 102 physicians were recruited. Results from this study showed that most of the physicians realize that all COVID-19 patients need VTE risk assessment (n = 69, 67.6%). Regarding VTE prophylaxis, the majority of physicians (n = 91, 89.2%) agreed that low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is the best prophylactic option for mild-moderate COVID-19 patients with high VTE risk. Regarding severe/critically ill COVID-19 patients, 75.5% of physicians (n = 77) recognized that LMWH is the correct prophylactic option in this case, while 80.4% of them (n = 82) knew that mechanical prevention is the preferred prophylactic option for severe/critically ill COVID-19 patients with high bleeding risk. Moreover, 77.5% of physicians (n = 79) knew that LMWH is the treatment of choice for COVID-19 patients diagnosed with VTE. Finally, linear regression analysis showed that consultants had an overall higher knowledge score about VTE prevention and treatment in COVID-19 patients compared with residents (P = 0.009).\\n \\n \\n \\n All physicians knew about VTE risk factors for COVID-19 patients. However, consultants showed better awareness of VTE prophylaxis and treatment compared with residents. We recommend educational workshops be conducted to enhance physicians’ knowledge and awareness about VTE thromboprophylaxis and management in COVID-19 patients.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":16705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jphsr/rmac021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jphsr/rmac021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估约旦医生对COVID-19患者静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)风险的认识及其治疗方案。这是一项基于横断面的调查,于2020年在约旦进行。在研究期间,在约旦各医院工作的医生的方便样本被邀请参加这项研究。对医生的知识进行评估,每答对一个问题,医生得一分。然后,计算每个人的知识得分(总分23分)。在这项研究中,102名医生被招募。本研究结果显示,大多数医生意识到所有COVID-19患者都需要进行静脉血栓栓塞风险评估(n = 69, 67.6%)。在静脉血栓栓塞预防方面,大多数医生(n = 91, 89.2%)认为低分子肝素(LMWH)是轻中度静脉血栓栓塞高风险患者的最佳预防选择。在重症/危重症患者中,75.5% (n = 77)的医生认为低分子肝素是正确的预防方案,80.4% (n = 82)的医生认为机械预防是高危重症/危重症患者的首选预防方案。此外,77.5%的医生(n = 79)知道低分子肝素是诊断为VTE的COVID-19患者的治疗选择。最后,线性回归分析显示,咨询医生对COVID-19患者静脉血栓栓塞预防和治疗的总体知识得分高于住院医师(P = 0.009)。所有医生都知道COVID-19患者静脉血栓栓塞的危险因素。然而,与居民相比,咨询医生对静脉血栓栓塞的预防和治疗有更好的认识。我们建议开展教育研讨会,以提高医生对COVID-19患者静脉血栓形成预防和管理的知识和意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Jordanian physicians’ knowledge about venous thromboembolism risk and management among COVID-19 patients
The aim of this study was to assess Jordanian physicians’ awareness about venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk among COVID-19 patients and its treatment protocol. This was a cross-sectional-based survey that was conducted in Jordan in 2020. During the study period, a convenience sample of physicians working in various Jordanian hospitals were invited to participate in this study. Physicians’ knowledge was evaluated and physicians gained one point for each correct answer. Then, a knowledge score out of 23 was calculated for each. In this study, 102 physicians were recruited. Results from this study showed that most of the physicians realize that all COVID-19 patients need VTE risk assessment (n = 69, 67.6%). Regarding VTE prophylaxis, the majority of physicians (n = 91, 89.2%) agreed that low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is the best prophylactic option for mild-moderate COVID-19 patients with high VTE risk. Regarding severe/critically ill COVID-19 patients, 75.5% of physicians (n = 77) recognized that LMWH is the correct prophylactic option in this case, while 80.4% of them (n = 82) knew that mechanical prevention is the preferred prophylactic option for severe/critically ill COVID-19 patients with high bleeding risk. Moreover, 77.5% of physicians (n = 79) knew that LMWH is the treatment of choice for COVID-19 patients diagnosed with VTE. Finally, linear regression analysis showed that consultants had an overall higher knowledge score about VTE prevention and treatment in COVID-19 patients compared with residents (P = 0.009). All physicians knew about VTE risk factors for COVID-19 patients. However, consultants showed better awareness of VTE prophylaxis and treatment compared with residents. We recommend educational workshops be conducted to enhance physicians’ knowledge and awareness about VTE thromboprophylaxis and management in COVID-19 patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
The revised patient attitudes to deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire: an investigation using a large anonymized database Evaluation of a structured pharmacist-led intervention on glycemic control in underprivileged diabetic patients: a randomized open-label trial Cross-sectional study of pharmacists’ knowledge and beliefs about human papillomavirus, its vaccines, and barriers related to vaccine administration Analysis of cancer drugs receiving FDA’s Accelerated Approval between 1992 and 2021 Navigating digital health: perspectives of Australian community pharmacists—a short communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1