谈失败的改革:对亚历山大“秘密委员会”的一些看法

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY Transcultural Studies Pub Date : 2018-12-12 DOI:10.1163/23751606-01402005
M. Mikeshin
{"title":"谈失败的改革:对亚历山大“秘密委员会”的一些看法","authors":"M. Mikeshin","doi":"10.1163/23751606-01402005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To decode what Russian reformers meant when borrowing their wording from the West, one should try to immerse oneself into their context. The paper considers an example of Alexander I’s reforms at the very beginning of the nineteenth century. The political struggle and ideas of the Vorontsov brothers’ “Senatorial party” and the “Secret Committee” are studied in two ways. A straightforward “European” interpretation of concepts they all used is found to be misleading. Given the main principle of the Russian political system, autocracy, the Senatorial party understood “despotism” as “ministerial despotism” and fought not for reforms, but for access to the autocrat.","PeriodicalId":42064,"journal":{"name":"Transcultural Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/23751606-01402005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Talking of Reforms that Failed: Some Ideas about Alexander’s “Secret Committee”\",\"authors\":\"M. Mikeshin\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/23751606-01402005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To decode what Russian reformers meant when borrowing their wording from the West, one should try to immerse oneself into their context. The paper considers an example of Alexander I’s reforms at the very beginning of the nineteenth century. The political struggle and ideas of the Vorontsov brothers’ “Senatorial party” and the “Secret Committee” are studied in two ways. A straightforward “European” interpretation of concepts they all used is found to be misleading. Given the main principle of the Russian political system, autocracy, the Senatorial party understood “despotism” as “ministerial despotism” and fought not for reforms, but for access to the autocrat.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transcultural Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/23751606-01402005\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transcultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/23751606-01402005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transcultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23751606-01402005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要解读俄罗斯改革者从西方借用他们的措辞意味着什么,人们应该试着沉浸在他们的背景中。本文以十九世纪初亚历山大一世的改革为例。从两个方面研究了沃龙佐夫兄弟的“参议员党”和“秘密委员会”的政治斗争和思想。对他们所有人使用的概念的直接“欧洲人”解释被发现具有误导性。鉴于俄罗斯政治制度的主要原则——专制,参议院党将“专制主义”理解为“部长专制主义”,并不是为改革而战,而是为接触独裁者而战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Talking of Reforms that Failed: Some Ideas about Alexander’s “Secret Committee”
To decode what Russian reformers meant when borrowing their wording from the West, one should try to immerse oneself into their context. The paper considers an example of Alexander I’s reforms at the very beginning of the nineteenth century. The political struggle and ideas of the Vorontsov brothers’ “Senatorial party” and the “Secret Committee” are studied in two ways. A straightforward “European” interpretation of concepts they all used is found to be misleading. Given the main principle of the Russian political system, autocracy, the Senatorial party understood “despotism” as “ministerial despotism” and fought not for reforms, but for access to the autocrat.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Transcultural Studies is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal committed to promoting the knowledge and research of transculturality in all disciplines. It is published by the Cluster of Excellence “Asia and Europe in a Global Context: The Dynamics of Transculturality” of the Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg.
期刊最新文献
An Interview with Robert Quinn, Founding Executive Director of the Global Network Scholars at Risk Introduction (français) L’enseignement supérieur au cœur de la tourmente libanaise Academic Freedom, Autonomy of Universities: Turning Point in the Evolution of Industrial Societies Benny Tai – Testing the Bottom-Line of Academic Freedom and Freedom of Expression in Hong Kong
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1