针对青少年大麻驾驶障碍的基于手机的简短干预:德尔菲研究。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108802
Robert Colonna , Patricia Tucker , Jeffrey Holmes , Jessie Wilson , Liliana Alvarez
{"title":"针对青少年大麻驾驶障碍的基于手机的简短干预:德尔菲研究。","authors":"Robert Colonna ,&nbsp;Patricia Tucker ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Holmes ,&nbsp;Jessie Wilson ,&nbsp;Liliana Alvarez","doi":"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Brief interventions delivered using mobile technologies have become popular to reduce youth alcohol use, however, few have been applied to cannabis use and driving under the influence of cannabis (DUIC). This Delphi study sought to create and compare consensus among a panel of experts (potential intervention developers) and a panel of youth (intervention audience) on the characteristics to prioritize in a youth DUIC mobile-based brief intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>A two-round two-panel Delphi study was conducted among 26 professionals with expertise in youth substance use and impaired driving and 20 youth who use cannabis. Participants ranked the importance of 45 evidence-informed intervention characteristics using a 7-point Likert scale. Characteristics that received an interquartile deviation score ≤ 1 (indicating consensus) and a median score of ≥6 (indicating importance) in both panels were considered shared priorities. Differences in panel rankings were quantified using Mann-Whitney </span><em>U</em> tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Consensus was achieved for 41 characteristics in the professional panel and 34 in the youth panel, with ratings generally higher among professionals. Overall, 16 shared priorities emerged. These include critical theoretical characteristics (e.g., self-efficacy, motivation, overcoming barriers), practical characteristics (e.g., mobile availability, estimates of intervention length, ability to input behaviours) and core contents (e.g., real-life stories, education on the risks/dangers, appropriate messaging). Youth's perceptions on the dangers of DUIC received the most support for an intervention outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Findings can inform the development of mobile-based brief interventions for youth, an essential step in reducing DUIC among youth and addressing this public health concern.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 108802"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobile-based brief interventions targeting cannabis-impaired driving among youth: A Delphi study\",\"authors\":\"Robert Colonna ,&nbsp;Patricia Tucker ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Holmes ,&nbsp;Jessie Wilson ,&nbsp;Liliana Alvarez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Brief interventions delivered using mobile technologies have become popular to reduce youth alcohol use, however, few have been applied to cannabis use and driving under the influence of cannabis (DUIC). This Delphi study sought to create and compare consensus among a panel of experts (potential intervention developers) and a panel of youth (intervention audience) on the characteristics to prioritize in a youth DUIC mobile-based brief intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>A two-round two-panel Delphi study was conducted among 26 professionals with expertise in youth substance use and impaired driving and 20 youth who use cannabis. Participants ranked the importance of 45 evidence-informed intervention characteristics using a 7-point Likert scale. Characteristics that received an interquartile deviation score ≤ 1 (indicating consensus) and a median score of ≥6 (indicating importance) in both panels were considered shared priorities. Differences in panel rankings were quantified using Mann-Whitney </span><em>U</em> tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Consensus was achieved for 41 characteristics in the professional panel and 34 in the youth panel, with ratings generally higher among professionals. Overall, 16 shared priorities emerged. These include critical theoretical characteristics (e.g., self-efficacy, motivation, overcoming barriers), practical characteristics (e.g., mobile availability, estimates of intervention length, ability to input behaviours) and core contents (e.g., real-life stories, education on the risks/dangers, appropriate messaging). Youth's perceptions on the dangers of DUIC received the most support for an intervention outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Findings can inform the development of mobile-based brief interventions for youth, an essential step in reducing DUIC among youth and addressing this public health concern.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222000848\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222000848","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

前言利用移动技术提供的简短干预措施已成为减少青少年饮酒的流行手段,但很少用于大麻的使用和大麻影响下的驾驶。本德尔菲研究试图在专家小组(潜在的干预开发者)和青少年小组(干预受众)之间就青少年DUIC基于移动的简短干预中优先考虑的特征建立并比较共识。方法对26名青少年药物使用和酒后驾驶专业人员和20名青少年大麻使用人员进行两轮双面板德尔菲研究。参与者使用7分李克特量表对45个循证干预特征的重要性进行排名。在两个小组中,四分位数偏差评分≤1(表明共识)和中位数评分≥6(表明重要性)的特征被认为是共同的优先级。使用Mann-Whitney U检验对小组排名的差异进行量化。结果在专业小组和青年小组中,有41个特征达成共识,34个特征达成共识,专业小组的评分普遍较高。总的来说,出现了16个共同的优先事项。这些包括关键的理论特征(例如,自我效能、动机、克服障碍)、实践特征(例如,移动可用性、干预时间估计、输入行为的能力)和核心内容(例如,真实故事、风险/危险教育、适当的信息传递)。青少年对DUIC危险的认知得到了干预结果的最大支持。结论:研究结果可以为开发基于移动的青少年简短干预措施提供信息,这是减少青少年DUIC和解决这一公共卫生问题的重要步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mobile-based brief interventions targeting cannabis-impaired driving among youth: A Delphi study

Introduction

Brief interventions delivered using mobile technologies have become popular to reduce youth alcohol use, however, few have been applied to cannabis use and driving under the influence of cannabis (DUIC). This Delphi study sought to create and compare consensus among a panel of experts (potential intervention developers) and a panel of youth (intervention audience) on the characteristics to prioritize in a youth DUIC mobile-based brief intervention.

Methods

A two-round two-panel Delphi study was conducted among 26 professionals with expertise in youth substance use and impaired driving and 20 youth who use cannabis. Participants ranked the importance of 45 evidence-informed intervention characteristics using a 7-point Likert scale. Characteristics that received an interquartile deviation score ≤ 1 (indicating consensus) and a median score of ≥6 (indicating importance) in both panels were considered shared priorities. Differences in panel rankings were quantified using Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results

Consensus was achieved for 41 characteristics in the professional panel and 34 in the youth panel, with ratings generally higher among professionals. Overall, 16 shared priorities emerged. These include critical theoretical characteristics (e.g., self-efficacy, motivation, overcoming barriers), practical characteristics (e.g., mobile availability, estimates of intervention length, ability to input behaviours) and core contents (e.g., real-life stories, education on the risks/dangers, appropriate messaging). Youth's perceptions on the dangers of DUIC received the most support for an intervention outcome.

Conclusions

Findings can inform the development of mobile-based brief interventions for youth, an essential step in reducing DUIC among youth and addressing this public health concern.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: The Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (JSAT) features original reviews, training and educational articles, special commentary, and especially research articles that are meaningful to the treatment of alcohol, heroin, marijuana, and other drugs of dependence. JSAT is directed toward treatment practitioners from all disciplines (medicine, nursing, social work, psychology, and counseling) in both private and public sectors, including those involved in schools, health centers, community agencies, correctional facilities, and individual practices. The editors emphasize that JSAT articles should address techniques and treatment approaches that can be used directly by contemporary practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Not in my treatment center: Leadership's perception of barriers to MOUD adoption Peer support to reduce readmission in Medicaid-enrolled adults with substance use disorder National trends in buprenorphine prescribing before and during the COVID-19 pandemic A qualitative analysis of barriers to opioid agonist treatment for racial/ethnic minoritized populations An intervention pilot to facilitate harm reduction service decentralization in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1