输尿管上段大于1cm结石的无管微型经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管镜碎石术比较

IF 0.2 Q4 SURGERY Formosan Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1097/fs9.0000000000000079
Chu-Min Chou, Chung-Jing Wang, Y. Jou, M. Cheng, Cheng-Huang Shen, Chang-te Lin
{"title":"输尿管上段大于1cm结石的无管微型经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管镜碎石术比较","authors":"Chu-Min Chou, Chung-Jing Wang, Y. Jou, M. Cheng, Cheng-Huang Shen, Chang-te Lin","doi":"10.1097/fs9.0000000000000079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n To assess the outcome and safety of tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) and flexible ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy (fURSL) in treating upper ureteral stones larger than 1 cm.\n \n \n \n Between July 2017 and June 2020, 218 patients underwent tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL for upper ureteral calculi larger than 1 cm were enrolled in this study. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes and complications were evaluated by retrospective chart review.\n \n \n \n Immediate stone-free rates after the procedure were 100 % of patients for the tubeless mini-PCNL and 71.0 % of patients for the fURSL group (P = 0.004). The mean operative time per patient was 79.8 ± 21.8 minutes in the tubeless mini-PCNL group, and it was 99.7 ± 33.8 minutes in the fURSL groups (P = 0.009). The average hospital stay was 2.7 ± 1.9 days in the tubeless mini-PCNL group and 1.5 ± 1.2 days in the fURSL group (P < 0.001). The rate of febrile episode for the tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL groups were 14.3 % and 2.3%, respectively (P = 0.028)\n \n \n \n Tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL are safe and feasible treatment options for proximal ureteral calculi larger than 1 cm. Tubeless mini-PCNL offers better outcome of higher stone-free rate and shorter operation time compared with fURSL, but with a higher rate of febrile complications and longer hospital stay.\n","PeriodicalId":12390,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between Tubeless Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Flexible Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Calculi Larger than 1 cm\",\"authors\":\"Chu-Min Chou, Chung-Jing Wang, Y. Jou, M. Cheng, Cheng-Huang Shen, Chang-te Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/fs9.0000000000000079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n To assess the outcome and safety of tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) and flexible ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy (fURSL) in treating upper ureteral stones larger than 1 cm.\\n \\n \\n \\n Between July 2017 and June 2020, 218 patients underwent tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL for upper ureteral calculi larger than 1 cm were enrolled in this study. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes and complications were evaluated by retrospective chart review.\\n \\n \\n \\n Immediate stone-free rates after the procedure were 100 % of patients for the tubeless mini-PCNL and 71.0 % of patients for the fURSL group (P = 0.004). The mean operative time per patient was 79.8 ± 21.8 minutes in the tubeless mini-PCNL group, and it was 99.7 ± 33.8 minutes in the fURSL groups (P = 0.009). The average hospital stay was 2.7 ± 1.9 days in the tubeless mini-PCNL group and 1.5 ± 1.2 days in the fURSL group (P < 0.001). The rate of febrile episode for the tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL groups were 14.3 % and 2.3%, respectively (P = 0.028)\\n \\n \\n \\n Tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL are safe and feasible treatment options for proximal ureteral calculi larger than 1 cm. Tubeless mini-PCNL offers better outcome of higher stone-free rate and shorter operation time compared with fURSL, but with a higher rate of febrile complications and longer hospital stay.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":12390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Formosan Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Formosan Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了评估无管小型经皮肾镜取石术(mPCNL)和柔性输尿管肾镜碎石术(fURSL)治疗1cm以上输尿管上段结石的疗效和安全性。2017年7月至2020年6月,218名患者接受了无管小型PCNL和fURSL治疗1cm以下输尿管上段结石。通过回顾性图表回顾评估患者特征、围手术期结果和并发症。术后即刻结石清除率无管迷你PCNL组为100%,fURSL组为71.0%(P=0.004),fURSL组平均住院时间为99.7±33.8分钟(P=0.009),无管迷你PCNL组平均住院2.7±1.9天,分别为(P=0.028)对于直径大于1cm的输尿管近端结石,无管迷你PCNL和fURSL是安全可行的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison between Tubeless Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Flexible Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Calculi Larger than 1 cm
To assess the outcome and safety of tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) and flexible ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy (fURSL) in treating upper ureteral stones larger than 1 cm. Between July 2017 and June 2020, 218 patients underwent tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL for upper ureteral calculi larger than 1 cm were enrolled in this study. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes and complications were evaluated by retrospective chart review. Immediate stone-free rates after the procedure were 100 % of patients for the tubeless mini-PCNL and 71.0 % of patients for the fURSL group (P = 0.004). The mean operative time per patient was 79.8 ± 21.8 minutes in the tubeless mini-PCNL group, and it was 99.7 ± 33.8 minutes in the fURSL groups (P = 0.009). The average hospital stay was 2.7 ± 1.9 days in the tubeless mini-PCNL group and 1.5 ± 1.2 days in the fURSL group (P < 0.001). The rate of febrile episode for the tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL groups were 14.3 % and 2.3%, respectively (P = 0.028) Tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL are safe and feasible treatment options for proximal ureteral calculi larger than 1 cm. Tubeless mini-PCNL offers better outcome of higher stone-free rate and shorter operation time compared with fURSL, but with a higher rate of febrile complications and longer hospital stay.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Formosan Journal of Surgery, a publication of Taiwan Surgical Association, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Bimonthly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.e-fjs.org. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.
期刊最新文献
Urethral Pseudodiverticulum with Left-Sided Non-Functioning Kidney: Case Report Upholding Ethical Standards in Post-Publication Interactions: A Call to Action Efficacy and Safety of Extended-Release Dinalbuphine Sebacate for Postoperative Analgesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Infected Urachal Cyst with Urethral Stricture Disease presenting with intraperitoneal perforation of cyst and pyoperitoneum AI-powered medicine is being repurposed to find novel surgical infection cures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1