环境监管对收入不平等重要吗?华人社区的新证据

IF 3.1 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Pub Date : 2023-02-02 DOI:10.1086/724519
Bihong Huang, Ying Yao
{"title":"环境监管对收入不平等重要吗?华人社区的新证据","authors":"Bihong Huang, Ying Yao","doi":"10.1086/724519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study uses data from an ongoing, open-cohort, longitudinal China Health and Nutrition Survey to examine how the environmental regulation aimed at abating sulfur dioxide (SO2) alters income distribution. We find that this regulation induces a 14%–27% decrease in income inequality, depending on the measurement method. An improvement in income inequality is achieved by lowering the wages of high-income groups while keeping the wages of low-income groups (especially blue-collar workers) unchanged. This change in the labor market can be attributed to a policy that primarily targets emissions from power plants while leaving the manufacturing sector unaffected. As a result, the manufacturing sector continues to create jobs and absorb the blue-collar workers dismissed from other sectors, mitigating the widening income gap. Our study sheds new light on the role of environmental policy in reshaping the labor market and its implications for income distribution.","PeriodicalId":47114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Environmental Regulation Matter for Income Inequality? New Evidence from Chinese Communities\",\"authors\":\"Bihong Huang, Ying Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/724519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study uses data from an ongoing, open-cohort, longitudinal China Health and Nutrition Survey to examine how the environmental regulation aimed at abating sulfur dioxide (SO2) alters income distribution. We find that this regulation induces a 14%–27% decrease in income inequality, depending on the measurement method. An improvement in income inequality is achieved by lowering the wages of high-income groups while keeping the wages of low-income groups (especially blue-collar workers) unchanged. This change in the labor market can be attributed to a policy that primarily targets emissions from power plants while leaving the manufacturing sector unaffected. As a result, the manufacturing sector continues to create jobs and absorb the blue-collar workers dismissed from other sectors, mitigating the widening income gap. Our study sheds new light on the role of environmental policy in reshaping the labor market and its implications for income distribution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/724519\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724519","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这项研究使用了一项正在进行的开放队列纵向中国健康与营养调查的数据,以检验旨在减少二氧化硫(SO2)的环境法规如何改变收入分配。我们发现,根据衡量方法的不同,这一规定导致收入不平等减少了14%-27%。收入不平等的改善是通过降低高收入群体的工资,同时保持低收入群体(尤其是蓝领工人)的工资不变来实现的。劳动力市场的这种变化可以归因于一项主要针对发电厂排放而不影响制造业的政策。因此,制造业继续创造就业机会,吸收其他行业解雇的蓝领工人,缓解了日益扩大的收入差距。我们的研究为环境政策在重塑劳动力市场中的作用及其对收入分配的影响提供了新的线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Environmental Regulation Matter for Income Inequality? New Evidence from Chinese Communities
This study uses data from an ongoing, open-cohort, longitudinal China Health and Nutrition Survey to examine how the environmental regulation aimed at abating sulfur dioxide (SO2) alters income distribution. We find that this regulation induces a 14%–27% decrease in income inequality, depending on the measurement method. An improvement in income inequality is achieved by lowering the wages of high-income groups while keeping the wages of low-income groups (especially blue-collar workers) unchanged. This change in the labor market can be attributed to a policy that primarily targets emissions from power plants while leaving the manufacturing sector unaffected. As a result, the manufacturing sector continues to create jobs and absorb the blue-collar workers dismissed from other sectors, mitigating the widening income gap. Our study sheds new light on the role of environmental policy in reshaping the labor market and its implications for income distribution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Enforcing Regulation when Violations are Heterogeneous: Empirical Evidence from U.S. Stationary Emissions Policy Information scripts and the incentive compatibility of discrete choice experiments Mind the tap – how volumetric pricing affects residential hot water consumption Resource investments and the timing of tax deductions Environmental Policy Uncertainty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1