DCE‐MRI用于食管癌同步放化疗后治疗反应的早期评估及其预测HIF‐1α表达的价值

IF 0.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Precision Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1002/prm2.12049
Xiaodong Xie, Lingling Gu, Zhen Guo, H. Tao, Yiqin Zhou, W. Shen, Zhengyang Zhou
{"title":"DCE‐MRI用于食管癌同步放化疗后治疗反应的早期评估及其预测HIF‐1α表达的价值","authors":"Xiaodong Xie, Lingling Gu, Zhen Guo, H. Tao, Yiqin Zhou, W. Shen, Zhengyang Zhou","doi":"10.1002/prm2.12049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To examine the feasibility of quantitative dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) in the early assessment of the therapeutic response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in esophageal cancer (EC) patients and to determine its value in predicting HIF‐1α expression. EC patients underwent DCE‐MRI 1 week pre‐CRT and 3 weeks post‐CRT (3w‐CRT). According to tumor regression post‐treatment, patients were divided into sensitive group (SG) and resistant group (RG). HIF‐1α expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Quantitative parameters (ktrans, kep, and ve) were compared between the SG and RG groups, as well as between the HIF‐1α(+) and HIF‐1α(−) groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to detect the best predictor of the above parameters in the therapeutic response and in predicting HIF‐1α expression. Totally 34 and 5 patients were included in the SG and RG, respectively. Pre‐ktrans and pre‐kep were decreased significantly in the SG at 3w‐CRT (p < .01), whereas only pre‐kep was decreased in the RG (p = .037). Pre‐ktrans was higher in the SG compared with the RG (p < .01). Meanwhile, absolute Δktrans (post‐ktrans–pre‐ktrans) was reduced more substantially in the SG compared with the RG. Δktrans also had the highest area under the curve (AUC = 0.929) in distinguishing SG from RG. Based on IHC, 13 and 11 patients were HIF‐1α(+) and HIF‐1α(−), respectively. At 3w‐CRT, post‐ktrans was markedly lower than pre‐ktrans in the HIF‐1α(+) group (p < .01); however, both ktrans and kep in the HIF‐1α(−) group were dramatically reduced than pre‐treatment values (both p < .01). Pre‐ktrans was significantly higher in the HIF‐1α(−) group compared with the HIF‐1α(+) group (p = .002) and constituted an excellent parameter for predicting HIF‐1α expression (AUC = 0.881). DCE‐MRI is effective in the early assessment of the therapeutic response after CRT, offering a novel noninvasive method for predicting HIF‐1α expression in advanced EC patients.","PeriodicalId":40071,"journal":{"name":"Precision Medical Sciences","volume":"10 1","pages":"118 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/prm2.12049","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DCE‐MRI for early evaluation of therapeutic response in esophageal cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and its values in predicting HIF‐1α expression\",\"authors\":\"Xiaodong Xie, Lingling Gu, Zhen Guo, H. Tao, Yiqin Zhou, W. Shen, Zhengyang Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/prm2.12049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To examine the feasibility of quantitative dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) in the early assessment of the therapeutic response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in esophageal cancer (EC) patients and to determine its value in predicting HIF‐1α expression. EC patients underwent DCE‐MRI 1 week pre‐CRT and 3 weeks post‐CRT (3w‐CRT). According to tumor regression post‐treatment, patients were divided into sensitive group (SG) and resistant group (RG). HIF‐1α expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Quantitative parameters (ktrans, kep, and ve) were compared between the SG and RG groups, as well as between the HIF‐1α(+) and HIF‐1α(−) groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to detect the best predictor of the above parameters in the therapeutic response and in predicting HIF‐1α expression. Totally 34 and 5 patients were included in the SG and RG, respectively. Pre‐ktrans and pre‐kep were decreased significantly in the SG at 3w‐CRT (p < .01), whereas only pre‐kep was decreased in the RG (p = .037). Pre‐ktrans was higher in the SG compared with the RG (p < .01). Meanwhile, absolute Δktrans (post‐ktrans–pre‐ktrans) was reduced more substantially in the SG compared with the RG. Δktrans also had the highest area under the curve (AUC = 0.929) in distinguishing SG from RG. Based on IHC, 13 and 11 patients were HIF‐1α(+) and HIF‐1α(−), respectively. At 3w‐CRT, post‐ktrans was markedly lower than pre‐ktrans in the HIF‐1α(+) group (p < .01); however, both ktrans and kep in the HIF‐1α(−) group were dramatically reduced than pre‐treatment values (both p < .01). Pre‐ktrans was significantly higher in the HIF‐1α(−) group compared with the HIF‐1α(+) group (p = .002) and constituted an excellent parameter for predicting HIF‐1α expression (AUC = 0.881). DCE‐MRI is effective in the early assessment of the therapeutic response after CRT, offering a novel noninvasive method for predicting HIF‐1α expression in advanced EC patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Precision Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"118 - 126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/prm2.12049\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Precision Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/prm2.12049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prm2.12049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨定量动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE‐MRI)在食管癌(EC)患者同步放化疗(CRT)治疗反应早期评估中的可行性,并确定其在预测HIF‐1α表达方面的价值。EC患者在CRT前1周和CRT后3周(3w - CRT)接受DCE - MRI检查。根据治疗后肿瘤消退情况将患者分为敏感组(SG)和耐药组(RG)。免疫组化(IHC)检测HIF‐1α的表达。比较SG组和RG组之间以及HIF‐1α(+)组和HIF‐1α(−)组之间的定量参数(ktrans、kep和ve)。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,以检测上述参数在治疗反应和预测HIF‐1α表达方面的最佳预测因子。SG组34例,RG组5例。3w - CRT时,SG组Pre - ktrans和Pre - kep显著降低(p < 0.01),而RG组只有Pre - kep降低(p = 0.037)。SG组的Pre - ktrans高于RG组(p < 0.01)。同时,与RG相比,SG中绝对Δktrans(后ktrans -前ktrans)的减少幅度更大。Δktrans在区分SG和RG时曲线下面积最大(AUC = 0.929)。基于免疫组化,HIF‐1α(+)和HIF‐1α(-)分别为13例和11例。在3w - CRT时,HIF - 1α(+)组的ktrans后明显低于ktrans前(p < 0.01);然而,HIF‐1α(−)组的ktrans和kep均显著低于预处理值(p均< 0.01)。Pre - ktrans在HIF‐1α(−)组显著高于HIF‐1α(+)组(p = 0.002),是预测HIF‐1α表达的一个很好的参数(AUC = 0.881)。DCE‐MRI在CRT后治疗反应的早期评估中是有效的,为预测晚期EC患者HIF‐1α表达提供了一种新的无创方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DCE‐MRI for early evaluation of therapeutic response in esophageal cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and its values in predicting HIF‐1α expression
To examine the feasibility of quantitative dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) in the early assessment of the therapeutic response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in esophageal cancer (EC) patients and to determine its value in predicting HIF‐1α expression. EC patients underwent DCE‐MRI 1 week pre‐CRT and 3 weeks post‐CRT (3w‐CRT). According to tumor regression post‐treatment, patients were divided into sensitive group (SG) and resistant group (RG). HIF‐1α expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Quantitative parameters (ktrans, kep, and ve) were compared between the SG and RG groups, as well as between the HIF‐1α(+) and HIF‐1α(−) groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to detect the best predictor of the above parameters in the therapeutic response and in predicting HIF‐1α expression. Totally 34 and 5 patients were included in the SG and RG, respectively. Pre‐ktrans and pre‐kep were decreased significantly in the SG at 3w‐CRT (p < .01), whereas only pre‐kep was decreased in the RG (p = .037). Pre‐ktrans was higher in the SG compared with the RG (p < .01). Meanwhile, absolute Δktrans (post‐ktrans–pre‐ktrans) was reduced more substantially in the SG compared with the RG. Δktrans also had the highest area under the curve (AUC = 0.929) in distinguishing SG from RG. Based on IHC, 13 and 11 patients were HIF‐1α(+) and HIF‐1α(−), respectively. At 3w‐CRT, post‐ktrans was markedly lower than pre‐ktrans in the HIF‐1α(+) group (p < .01); however, both ktrans and kep in the HIF‐1α(−) group were dramatically reduced than pre‐treatment values (both p < .01). Pre‐ktrans was significantly higher in the HIF‐1α(−) group compared with the HIF‐1α(+) group (p = .002) and constituted an excellent parameter for predicting HIF‐1α expression (AUC = 0.881). DCE‐MRI is effective in the early assessment of the therapeutic response after CRT, offering a novel noninvasive method for predicting HIF‐1α expression in advanced EC patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Precision Medical Sciences
Precision Medical Sciences MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prostatectomy postoperative urinary incontinence: From origin to treatment A case report of adult type 2 familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis Which inflammatory marker might be the best indicator for sacroiliitis? miRNAs involvement in the etiology and targeted therapy of bladder cancer: Interaction between signaling pathway Xiaotan Sanjie Fang prevents colonic inflammation‐related tumorigenesis by inhibiting COX‐2/VEGF expression cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1