跟踪误差的使用与误用

IF 1.1 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Portfolio Management Pub Date : 2023-06-22 DOI:10.3905/jpm.2023.1.514
Eric Sorensen, Nicholas Alonso, D. Bélanger
{"title":"跟踪误差的使用与误用","authors":"Eric Sorensen, Nicholas Alonso, D. Bélanger","doi":"10.3905/jpm.2023.1.514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Equity portfolio tracking error to a benchmark is a most ubiquitous restriction for active portfolios as prescribed by fiduciaries. The restriction is typically a tight range with minimum and maximum ex-ante extremes. The typical capitalization-weighted benchmark (i.e., the S&P 500 Index) has significant changes in diversification character overtime. This brings into question the sensibility of holding tracking error (TE) constant for a skilled active manager. The authors demonstrate that as the concentration of names in the S&P 500 increases, its diversification fades. When this happens, constant tracking error is the enemy of the skilled diversified manager, other things equal. Using multivariate classification and regression trees (CART), they show that high tracking dominates low tracking when index concentration is low, trending lower, and return dispersion is high. Low tracking dominates when the opposite index conditions exist. The authors conclude that the power of a flexible TE process in wealth creation is dominant over inflexibility in the benchmark.","PeriodicalId":53670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Portfolio Management","volume":"49 1","pages":"12 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use and Misuse of Tracking Error\",\"authors\":\"Eric Sorensen, Nicholas Alonso, D. Bélanger\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jpm.2023.1.514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Equity portfolio tracking error to a benchmark is a most ubiquitous restriction for active portfolios as prescribed by fiduciaries. The restriction is typically a tight range with minimum and maximum ex-ante extremes. The typical capitalization-weighted benchmark (i.e., the S&P 500 Index) has significant changes in diversification character overtime. This brings into question the sensibility of holding tracking error (TE) constant for a skilled active manager. The authors demonstrate that as the concentration of names in the S&P 500 increases, its diversification fades. When this happens, constant tracking error is the enemy of the skilled diversified manager, other things equal. Using multivariate classification and regression trees (CART), they show that high tracking dominates low tracking when index concentration is low, trending lower, and return dispersion is high. Low tracking dominates when the opposite index conditions exist. The authors conclude that the power of a flexible TE process in wealth creation is dominant over inflexibility in the benchmark.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Portfolio Management\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"12 - 23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Portfolio Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2023.1.514\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Portfolio Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2023.1.514","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

股票投资组合对基准的跟踪误差是受托人规定的活跃投资组合最普遍的限制。限制通常是一个严格的范围,有最小和最大的事前极限。典型的资本化加权基准(即标准普尔500指数)随着时间的推移,多元化特征发生了重大变化。这就对熟练的主动管理者保持跟踪误差(TE)常数的敏感性提出了质疑。作者证明,随着标普500指数中名字的集中度增加,其多元化程度也会减弱。当这种情况发生时,不断的跟踪误差是熟练的多元化管理者的敌人,其他事情都一样。使用多元分类和回归树(CART),他们表明,当指数集中度较低、趋势较低、回报分散度较高时,高跟踪主导低跟踪。当存在相反的索引条件时,低跟踪占主导地位。作者得出的结论是,在基准中,灵活的TE过程在财富创造中的力量比不灵活的力量占主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Use and Misuse of Tracking Error
Equity portfolio tracking error to a benchmark is a most ubiquitous restriction for active portfolios as prescribed by fiduciaries. The restriction is typically a tight range with minimum and maximum ex-ante extremes. The typical capitalization-weighted benchmark (i.e., the S&P 500 Index) has significant changes in diversification character overtime. This brings into question the sensibility of holding tracking error (TE) constant for a skilled active manager. The authors demonstrate that as the concentration of names in the S&P 500 increases, its diversification fades. When this happens, constant tracking error is the enemy of the skilled diversified manager, other things equal. Using multivariate classification and regression trees (CART), they show that high tracking dominates low tracking when index concentration is low, trending lower, and return dispersion is high. Low tracking dominates when the opposite index conditions exist. The authors conclude that the power of a flexible TE process in wealth creation is dominant over inflexibility in the benchmark.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Portfolio Management
Journal of Portfolio Management Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
28.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Founded by Peter Bernstein in 1974, The Journal of Portfolio Management (JPM) is the definitive source of thought-provoking analysis and practical techniques in institutional investing. It offers cutting-edge research on asset allocation, performance measurement, market trends, risk management, portfolio optimization, and more. Each quarterly issue of JPM features articles by the most renowned researchers and practitioners—including Nobel laureates—whose works define modern portfolio theory.
期刊最新文献
Fixed Income Factors: Theory and Practice Peer Group Identification in Factor Portfolios: A Data-Driven Approach Factor Investing for Taxable Investors Return–Risk Analysis of Real Estate Tokens: An Asset Class of Its Own Sustainability Disclosure and Financial Performance: The Case of Private and Public Real Estate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1