关于企业对企业营销研究现状的一些思考

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2022-03-28 DOI:10.1080/1051712X.2022.2058542
Nektarios Tzempelikos
{"title":"关于企业对企业营销研究现状的一些思考","authors":"Nektarios Tzempelikos","doi":"10.1080/1051712X.2022.2058542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose This interlude mirrors some of the issues raised in Tanner’s recent paper (2021) on areas of contribution, made to the field: a review of several inflection points that led to the evolution of business-to-business (B-to-B) marketing research, the lack of relevance of B-to-B marketing research, and the challenge of little B-to-B research reaching mainstream journals. Acknowledged is that the issues addressed are timely and relevant to an inquiry into the current state of B-to-B research. It is agreed that B-to-B research remains under-represented in marketing literature and that B-to-B marketing research should be of value, if more practical. However, it is also argued that a more thoughtful discussion on the journals that publish B-to-B marketing studies is needed. There is a rising trend in the number and impact of Journal of Business to Business Marketing (JBBM) publications per year, not fully captured in Tanner’s study. This paper, augments that paper, by reflecting on some of the issues raised, while discussing implications beneficial for all our organizational marketing researchers. Design/methodology/approach This is both an assessment of historical data, literature review, and a contemporary analysis of business marketing research. It is based on the author’ interpretation of the case of relevance in B-to-B marketing research and the relative importance of JBBM within the field of B-to-B marketing. Findings A stronger case is made, for the relevance gap in B-to-B marketing research providing insights on, what does managerial relevance involve, why is there a gap between academics and practitioners, and how the gap can be bridged. Academics and practitioners agree that academic research should be of more practical value. However, their respective priorities differ. For academics publishing in refereed journals is the first priority and influencing practice is lower priority, while practitioners are not interested in the methodological and theoretical advances of business marketing research; their priority is to satisfy day-to-day practical needs. In addition, this article corrects the record on the relative importance of B-to-B journals in the contribution of studies of B-to-B marketing. JBBM’s growth in quality and influence to the field is documented. Practical implications The study provides academics with guidance concerning how B-to-B marketing research can have a greater effect on the practice of marketing. Originality/value This article contributes to the research base by identifying and discussing constantly emerging aspects of the academic/practitioner gap. The study also offers insights into how managerial relevance in marketing research can, practically, be improved. Also, this article reveals the impact that JBBM is achieving by fostering the evolution of business marketing.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some Reflections on the State of Business-to-Business Marketing Research\",\"authors\":\"Nektarios Tzempelikos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1051712X.2022.2058542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Purpose This interlude mirrors some of the issues raised in Tanner’s recent paper (2021) on areas of contribution, made to the field: a review of several inflection points that led to the evolution of business-to-business (B-to-B) marketing research, the lack of relevance of B-to-B marketing research, and the challenge of little B-to-B research reaching mainstream journals. Acknowledged is that the issues addressed are timely and relevant to an inquiry into the current state of B-to-B research. It is agreed that B-to-B research remains under-represented in marketing literature and that B-to-B marketing research should be of value, if more practical. However, it is also argued that a more thoughtful discussion on the journals that publish B-to-B marketing studies is needed. There is a rising trend in the number and impact of Journal of Business to Business Marketing (JBBM) publications per year, not fully captured in Tanner’s study. This paper, augments that paper, by reflecting on some of the issues raised, while discussing implications beneficial for all our organizational marketing researchers. Design/methodology/approach This is both an assessment of historical data, literature review, and a contemporary analysis of business marketing research. It is based on the author’ interpretation of the case of relevance in B-to-B marketing research and the relative importance of JBBM within the field of B-to-B marketing. Findings A stronger case is made, for the relevance gap in B-to-B marketing research providing insights on, what does managerial relevance involve, why is there a gap between academics and practitioners, and how the gap can be bridged. Academics and practitioners agree that academic research should be of more practical value. However, their respective priorities differ. For academics publishing in refereed journals is the first priority and influencing practice is lower priority, while practitioners are not interested in the methodological and theoretical advances of business marketing research; their priority is to satisfy day-to-day practical needs. In addition, this article corrects the record on the relative importance of B-to-B journals in the contribution of studies of B-to-B marketing. JBBM’s growth in quality and influence to the field is documented. Practical implications The study provides academics with guidance concerning how B-to-B marketing research can have a greater effect on the practice of marketing. Originality/value This article contributes to the research base by identifying and discussing constantly emerging aspects of the academic/practitioner gap. The study also offers insights into how managerial relevance in marketing research can, practically, be improved. Also, this article reveals the impact that JBBM is achieving by fostering the evolution of business marketing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2022.2058542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2022.2058542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这段插曲反映了坦纳(Tanner)最近发表的关于该领域贡献领域的论文(2021年)中提出的一些问题:对导致企业对企业(b2b)营销研究演变的几个拐点的回顾,b2b营销研究缺乏相关性,以及小型b2b研究进入主流期刊的挑战。公认的是,所讨论的问题是及时的,与对b2b研究现状的调查有关。人们一致认为,b2b研究在营销文献中仍然缺乏代表性,b2b营销研究应该是有价值的,如果更实用的话。然而,也有人认为,对发表b2b营销研究的期刊进行更深思熟虑的讨论是必要的。《企业对企业营销杂志》(JBBM)每年出版的数量和影响都有上升的趋势,这在坦纳的研究中没有完全体现出来。本文通过反思提出的一些问题,同时讨论对我们所有组织营销研究人员有益的影响,对该论文进行了补充。这既是对历史数据的评估、文献回顾,也是对商业营销研究的当代分析。这是基于作者对b2b营销研究中相关性案例的解释,以及JBBM在b2b营销领域的相对重要性。对于b2b营销研究中的相关性差距,本文提出了一个更强有力的案例,提供了以下方面的见解:管理相关性涉及什么,为什么学者和从业者之间存在差距,以及如何弥合差距。学术界和实践者一致认为,学术研究应该更具实用价值。然而,他们各自的重点有所不同。对于学者来说,在期刊上发表论文是第一要务,影响实践的重要性较低,而实践者对企业营销研究的方法和理论进展不感兴趣;他们的首要任务是满足日常实际需要。此外,本文纠正了b2b期刊在b2b营销研究贡献中的相对重要性的记录。JBBM在质量和对该领域的影响方面的增长是有据可查的。本研究为学术界提供了关于b2b营销研究如何对营销实践产生更大影响的指导。本文通过识别和讨论不断出现的学术/实践差距方面,为研究基础做出了贡献。该研究还提供了如何在营销研究管理相关性可以,实际上,被改进的见解。此外,本文还揭示了JBBM通过促进企业营销的发展而产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Some Reflections on the State of Business-to-Business Marketing Research
ABSTRACT Purpose This interlude mirrors some of the issues raised in Tanner’s recent paper (2021) on areas of contribution, made to the field: a review of several inflection points that led to the evolution of business-to-business (B-to-B) marketing research, the lack of relevance of B-to-B marketing research, and the challenge of little B-to-B research reaching mainstream journals. Acknowledged is that the issues addressed are timely and relevant to an inquiry into the current state of B-to-B research. It is agreed that B-to-B research remains under-represented in marketing literature and that B-to-B marketing research should be of value, if more practical. However, it is also argued that a more thoughtful discussion on the journals that publish B-to-B marketing studies is needed. There is a rising trend in the number and impact of Journal of Business to Business Marketing (JBBM) publications per year, not fully captured in Tanner’s study. This paper, augments that paper, by reflecting on some of the issues raised, while discussing implications beneficial for all our organizational marketing researchers. Design/methodology/approach This is both an assessment of historical data, literature review, and a contemporary analysis of business marketing research. It is based on the author’ interpretation of the case of relevance in B-to-B marketing research and the relative importance of JBBM within the field of B-to-B marketing. Findings A stronger case is made, for the relevance gap in B-to-B marketing research providing insights on, what does managerial relevance involve, why is there a gap between academics and practitioners, and how the gap can be bridged. Academics and practitioners agree that academic research should be of more practical value. However, their respective priorities differ. For academics publishing in refereed journals is the first priority and influencing practice is lower priority, while practitioners are not interested in the methodological and theoretical advances of business marketing research; their priority is to satisfy day-to-day practical needs. In addition, this article corrects the record on the relative importance of B-to-B journals in the contribution of studies of B-to-B marketing. JBBM’s growth in quality and influence to the field is documented. Practical implications The study provides academics with guidance concerning how B-to-B marketing research can have a greater effect on the practice of marketing. Originality/value This article contributes to the research base by identifying and discussing constantly emerging aspects of the academic/practitioner gap. The study also offers insights into how managerial relevance in marketing research can, practically, be improved. Also, this article reveals the impact that JBBM is achieving by fostering the evolution of business marketing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1