书评:《治理策略:在危险的世纪重塑公共行政》

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teaching Public Administration Pub Date : 2021-04-05 DOI:10.1177/0144739421997509
J. Perry
{"title":"书评:《治理策略:在危险的世纪重塑公共行政》","authors":"J. Perry","doi":"10.1177/0144739421997509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is an interesting and engaging book. Alasdair Roberts offers a coherent and comprehensive new direction for the field of public administration. His position is clearly argued. His proposals are provocative because they depart sharply from recent orthodoxy. At the outset, I want to be clear that I agree with much of Roberts’s argument. Although I offer critical perspective in this review, it is important that readers put my criticism in context. Roberts’s goals are ambitious, and what he delivers sometimes falls short of his aspirations. Let me begin by summarizing Roberts’s argument. I condense it here to four premises:","PeriodicalId":44241,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Public Administration","volume":"41 1","pages":"28 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0144739421997509","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book review: Strategies for Governing: Reinventing Public Administration for a Dangerous Century\",\"authors\":\"J. Perry\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0144739421997509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is an interesting and engaging book. Alasdair Roberts offers a coherent and comprehensive new direction for the field of public administration. His position is clearly argued. His proposals are provocative because they depart sharply from recent orthodoxy. At the outset, I want to be clear that I agree with much of Roberts’s argument. Although I offer critical perspective in this review, it is important that readers put my criticism in context. Roberts’s goals are ambitious, and what he delivers sometimes falls short of his aspirations. Let me begin by summarizing Roberts’s argument. I condense it here to four premises:\",\"PeriodicalId\":44241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching Public Administration\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"28 - 31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0144739421997509\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching Public Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739421997509\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739421997509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是一本有趣而引人入胜的书。阿拉斯代尔·罗伯茨为公共行政领域提供了一个连贯而全面的新方向。他的立场得到了明确的论证。他的建议具有挑衅性,因为它们与最近的正统观念大相径庭。首先,我想明确表示,我同意罗伯茨的大部分观点。虽然我在这篇评论中提供了批判性的观点,但重要的是读者将我的批评置于上下文中。罗伯茨的目标是雄心勃勃的,但他所做的有时达不到他的期望。让我先总结一下罗伯茨的观点。我把它浓缩为四个前提:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book review: Strategies for Governing: Reinventing Public Administration for a Dangerous Century
This is an interesting and engaging book. Alasdair Roberts offers a coherent and comprehensive new direction for the field of public administration. His position is clearly argued. His proposals are provocative because they depart sharply from recent orthodoxy. At the outset, I want to be clear that I agree with much of Roberts’s argument. Although I offer critical perspective in this review, it is important that readers put my criticism in context. Roberts’s goals are ambitious, and what he delivers sometimes falls short of his aspirations. Let me begin by summarizing Roberts’s argument. I condense it here to four premises:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching Public Administration
Teaching Public Administration EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Teaching Public Administration (TPA) is a peer-reviewed journal, published three times a year, which focuses on teaching and learning in public sector management and organisations. TPA is committed to publishing papers which promote critical thinking about the practice and process of teaching and learning as well as those which examine more theoretical and conceptual models of teaching and learning. It offers an international forum for the debate of a wide range of issues relating to how skills and knowledge are transmitted and acquired within public sector/not for profit organisations. The Editors welcome papers which draw upon multi-disciplinary ways of thinking and working and, in particular, we are interested in the following themes/issues: Learning from international practice and experience; Curriculum design and development across all levels from pre-degree to post graduate including professional development; Professional and Taught Doctoral Programmes; Reflective Practice and the role of the Reflective Practitioner; Co-production and co-construction of the curriculum; Developments within the ‘Public Administration’ discipline; Reviews of literature and policy statements.
期刊最新文献
Does Gen-AI have a role in public affairs education? Let’s ask ChatGPT Minding the gap between public administration curriculum and practice: The studio of public reasoning Book Review: Trump and the bureaucrats: The fate of neutral competence Assessing the integration of AI competencies in undergraduate public administration curricula in selected South African higher education institutions Training and retraining civil servants in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1