罪恶的妻子和王后

IF 1.6 Q2 COMMUNICATION Journal of Language and Sexuality Pub Date : 2022-02-11 DOI:10.1075/jls.19010.alf
F. Alfie
{"title":"罪恶的妻子和王后","authors":"F. Alfie","doi":"10.1075/jls.19010.alf","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The author of the Divine Comedy, Dante Alighieri (1265–1321), dealt with “sodomites” twice in his\n masterpiece, once in Inferno and again in Purgatorio. In their examinations of the passage in\n Inferno, literary critics have typically conflated the modern-day definition of “homosexual” with the\n medieval “sodomite.” In order to see how Dante viewed non-normative sexuality accurately, however, it is necessary first to\n uncouple the medieval term “sodomite” from today’s term, “homosexual,” and to apply instead the medieval definition of the\n former. Numerous sources of Dante’s time indicate that “sodomy” did not mean, strictly speaking, same sex practices between men,\n but rather it encompassed a wide array of sexual activities. The same is probably true of the sodomites in Dante’s\n Inferno, some of whom might not have bedded other men. Examination of the passage in\n Purgatorio, moreover, indicates a greater degree of subtlety in Dante’s thought regarding non-normative\n sexual attraction.","PeriodicalId":36680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sinful wives and queens\",\"authors\":\"F. Alfie\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jls.19010.alf\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The author of the Divine Comedy, Dante Alighieri (1265–1321), dealt with “sodomites” twice in his\\n masterpiece, once in Inferno and again in Purgatorio. In their examinations of the passage in\\n Inferno, literary critics have typically conflated the modern-day definition of “homosexual” with the\\n medieval “sodomite.” In order to see how Dante viewed non-normative sexuality accurately, however, it is necessary first to\\n uncouple the medieval term “sodomite” from today’s term, “homosexual,” and to apply instead the medieval definition of the\\n former. Numerous sources of Dante’s time indicate that “sodomy” did not mean, strictly speaking, same sex practices between men,\\n but rather it encompassed a wide array of sexual activities. The same is probably true of the sodomites in Dante’s\\n Inferno, some of whom might not have bedded other men. Examination of the passage in\\n Purgatorio, moreover, indicates a greater degree of subtlety in Dante’s thought regarding non-normative\\n sexual attraction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language and Sexuality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language and Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.19010.alf\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.19010.alf","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神曲的作者Dante Alighieri(1265-1321)在他的代表作中两次处理“鸡奸”,一次在《地狱》,一次是在《炼狱》。在对《地狱》中这段文字的研究中,文学评论家通常将现代对“同性恋”的定义与中世纪的“鸡奸”混为一谈。然而,为了了解但丁如何准确地看待非规范性行为,首先有必要将中世纪的术语“鸡奸者”与今天的术语脱钩,“同性恋”,而适用中世纪对前者的定义。但丁时代的许多资料表明,严格来说,“鸡奸”并不意味着男性之间的同性行为,而是包含了广泛的性活动。但丁的《地狱》中的鸡奸可能也是如此,其中一些人可能没有和其他男人上床。此外,对《炼狱》中这段文字的研究表明,但丁关于非规范性吸引力的思想有着更大程度的微妙之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sinful wives and queens
The author of the Divine Comedy, Dante Alighieri (1265–1321), dealt with “sodomites” twice in his masterpiece, once in Inferno and again in Purgatorio. In their examinations of the passage in Inferno, literary critics have typically conflated the modern-day definition of “homosexual” with the medieval “sodomite.” In order to see how Dante viewed non-normative sexuality accurately, however, it is necessary first to uncouple the medieval term “sodomite” from today’s term, “homosexual,” and to apply instead the medieval definition of the former. Numerous sources of Dante’s time indicate that “sodomy” did not mean, strictly speaking, same sex practices between men, but rather it encompassed a wide array of sexual activities. The same is probably true of the sodomites in Dante’s Inferno, some of whom might not have bedded other men. Examination of the passage in Purgatorio, moreover, indicates a greater degree of subtlety in Dante’s thought regarding non-normative sexual attraction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Language and Sexuality
Journal of Language and Sexuality Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Queer immigrants’ performative identity and cultural marginality in the context of queering ESL education Examining gay male discursive practices in hook-up apps The discursive manifestation of normativities in coming-out-to-family discourses in Japanese social media Navigating ‘safe’ and ‘non-safe’ queer spaces Review of Cordoba (2022): Non-Binary Gender Identities: The Language of Becoming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1