{"title":"医科大学博士学位申请审查制度研究——以首都医科大学为例","authors":"Qiu-long Li, Q. He, Xi He, Ping Wu, Jun Wu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1485.2019.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the data obtained from the questionnaire survey and personal in-depth interviews, this study preliminarily formulated the \"selection guidelines for the doctoral application review system of Capital Medical University\" (draft). In addition, through Delphi method and chi-square test, the author formulated the \"selection guidelines for the doctoral application review system of Capital Medical University\". The guide contained four primary indicators of scientific literacy, academic ability, scientific research ability and personality quality and 27 secondary indicators. The respondents generally believed that quality, ability and moral character were the core contents of the doctoral selection guide. The doctoral advisors attached great importance to the personality quality of the applicants while having high requirements on the quality and ability. Meanwhile, the doctoral advisors also had high requirements on the scientific research ability of doctoral students in professional degrees. \n \n \nKey words: \nDoctor of medicine; Doctoral candidate recruitment; Doctoral application review system; Selection guidelines","PeriodicalId":56557,"journal":{"name":"中华医学教育探索杂志","volume":"18 1","pages":"1189-1195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on the doctoral application review system of medical university—based on Capital Medical University\",\"authors\":\"Qiu-long Li, Q. He, Xi He, Ping Wu, Jun Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1485.2019.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on the data obtained from the questionnaire survey and personal in-depth interviews, this study preliminarily formulated the \\\"selection guidelines for the doctoral application review system of Capital Medical University\\\" (draft). In addition, through Delphi method and chi-square test, the author formulated the \\\"selection guidelines for the doctoral application review system of Capital Medical University\\\". The guide contained four primary indicators of scientific literacy, academic ability, scientific research ability and personality quality and 27 secondary indicators. The respondents generally believed that quality, ability and moral character were the core contents of the doctoral selection guide. The doctoral advisors attached great importance to the personality quality of the applicants while having high requirements on the quality and ability. Meanwhile, the doctoral advisors also had high requirements on the scientific research ability of doctoral students in professional degrees. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nDoctor of medicine; Doctoral candidate recruitment; Doctoral application review system; Selection guidelines\",\"PeriodicalId\":56557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华医学教育探索杂志\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"1189-1195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华医学教育探索杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1485.2019.12.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学教育探索杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1485.2019.12.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Research on the doctoral application review system of medical university—based on Capital Medical University
Based on the data obtained from the questionnaire survey and personal in-depth interviews, this study preliminarily formulated the "selection guidelines for the doctoral application review system of Capital Medical University" (draft). In addition, through Delphi method and chi-square test, the author formulated the "selection guidelines for the doctoral application review system of Capital Medical University". The guide contained four primary indicators of scientific literacy, academic ability, scientific research ability and personality quality and 27 secondary indicators. The respondents generally believed that quality, ability and moral character were the core contents of the doctoral selection guide. The doctoral advisors attached great importance to the personality quality of the applicants while having high requirements on the quality and ability. Meanwhile, the doctoral advisors also had high requirements on the scientific research ability of doctoral students in professional degrees.
Key words:
Doctor of medicine; Doctoral candidate recruitment; Doctoral application review system; Selection guidelines