目的探讨脊髓麻醉下剖宫产时预防性输注25、50 μg/Min苯肾上腺素对产妇低血压、不良反应及胎儿酸碱平衡的影响

R. Akshay, J. Bajaj
{"title":"目的探讨脊髓麻醉下剖宫产时预防性输注25、50 μg/Min苯肾上腺素对产妇低血压、不良反应及胎儿酸碱平衡的影响","authors":"R. Akshay, J. Bajaj","doi":"10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_67_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To study maternal hypotension, side effects, and fetal acid-base balance during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia using prophylactic infusion doses of 25 and 50 μg/min phenylephrine. Methods: This prospective randomized study was carried out at a tertiary care hospital on 100 pregnant women who underwent caesarean section under subarachnoid block. The participants were randomized into: Group P1 (n = 50): who received phenylephrine 25 μg/min infusion prophylactically and Group P2 (n = 50) received phenylephrine 50 μg/min infusion prophylactically. The two groups were compared for heart rate, blood pressure, side effects, and fetal arterial and venous blood gas analysis. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In group P1, 3 (6%) patients had episode of hypotension and in group P2, 1 (2%) patient had episode of hypotension. There was no incidence of hypertension in group P1 but in group P2, 5 (10%) patients had hypertension (p < 0.05). There was no episode of bradycardia or oxygen desaturation in any group. Side effects were Grade 1 in three patients each in both the groups, and Grade 2 in one patient of Group P1 and four patients in Group P2 (p = 0.842). Fetal acid-base balance was comparable in the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: It can be concluded that 50 μg/min phenylephrine was able to better prevent maternal hypotension with comparable side-effects profile and fetal acid base balance.","PeriodicalId":16611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"166 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To study maternal hypotension, side-effects and fetal acid-base balance during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia using prophylactic infusion doses of 25 and 50 μg/Min phenylephrine\",\"authors\":\"R. Akshay, J. Bajaj\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_67_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To study maternal hypotension, side effects, and fetal acid-base balance during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia using prophylactic infusion doses of 25 and 50 μg/min phenylephrine. Methods: This prospective randomized study was carried out at a tertiary care hospital on 100 pregnant women who underwent caesarean section under subarachnoid block. The participants were randomized into: Group P1 (n = 50): who received phenylephrine 25 μg/min infusion prophylactically and Group P2 (n = 50) received phenylephrine 50 μg/min infusion prophylactically. The two groups were compared for heart rate, blood pressure, side effects, and fetal arterial and venous blood gas analysis. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In group P1, 3 (6%) patients had episode of hypotension and in group P2, 1 (2%) patient had episode of hypotension. There was no incidence of hypertension in group P1 but in group P2, 5 (10%) patients had hypertension (p < 0.05). There was no episode of bradycardia or oxygen desaturation in any group. Side effects were Grade 1 in three patients each in both the groups, and Grade 2 in one patient of Group P1 and four patients in Group P2 (p = 0.842). Fetal acid-base balance was comparable in the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: It can be concluded that 50 μg/min phenylephrine was able to better prevent maternal hypotension with comparable side-effects profile and fetal acid base balance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"166 - 171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_67_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_67_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:观察腰麻下剖宫产时预防性输注25、50 μg/min苯肾上腺素对产妇低血压、不良反应及胎儿酸碱平衡的影响。方法:本前瞻性随机研究在某三级医院对100例经蛛网膜下腔阻滞剖宫产的孕妇进行。随机分为:P1组(n = 50)预防性滴注苯肾上腺素25 μg/min, P2组(n = 50)预防性滴注苯肾上腺素50 μg/min。比较两组患者心率、血压、副作用及胎儿动、静脉血气分析。P值< 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:P1组3例(6%)患者出现低血压发作,P2组1例(2%)患者出现低血压发作。P1组无高血压,P2组有5例(10%)高血压(p < 0.05)。两组均未发生心动过缓或氧饱和度过低。两组毒副反应均为1级3例,P1组毒副反应为1例,P2组毒副反应为4例(p = 0.842)。两组胎儿酸碱平衡具有可比性(p < 0.05)。结论:50 μg/min的苯肾上腺素能较好地预防产妇低血压,且副作用和胎儿酸碱平衡相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
To study maternal hypotension, side-effects and fetal acid-base balance during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia using prophylactic infusion doses of 25 and 50 μg/Min phenylephrine
Objectives: To study maternal hypotension, side effects, and fetal acid-base balance during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia using prophylactic infusion doses of 25 and 50 μg/min phenylephrine. Methods: This prospective randomized study was carried out at a tertiary care hospital on 100 pregnant women who underwent caesarean section under subarachnoid block. The participants were randomized into: Group P1 (n = 50): who received phenylephrine 25 μg/min infusion prophylactically and Group P2 (n = 50) received phenylephrine 50 μg/min infusion prophylactically. The two groups were compared for heart rate, blood pressure, side effects, and fetal arterial and venous blood gas analysis. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In group P1, 3 (6%) patients had episode of hypotension and in group P2, 1 (2%) patient had episode of hypotension. There was no incidence of hypertension in group P1 but in group P2, 5 (10%) patients had hypertension (p < 0.05). There was no episode of bradycardia or oxygen desaturation in any group. Side effects were Grade 1 in three patients each in both the groups, and Grade 2 in one patient of Group P1 and four patients in Group P2 (p = 0.842). Fetal acid-base balance was comparable in the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: It can be concluded that 50 μg/min phenylephrine was able to better prevent maternal hypotension with comparable side-effects profile and fetal acid base balance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
To study maternal hypotension, side-effects and fetal acid-base balance during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia using prophylactic infusion doses of 25 and 50 μg/Min phenylephrine Takotsubo cardiomyopathy in pregnancy: A focused review Comparative evaluation of two doses of phenylephrine infusion to prevent intra-operative nausea and vomiting during elective obstetric spinal anesthesia Carbetocin: Are we ready for a paradigm shift? Evaluation of perfusion index as a screening tool for prediction of hypotension and shivering in cesarean section
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1