认证供应链是否更具社会可持续性?议价能力分析

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization Pub Date : 2020-12-14 DOI:10.1515/jafio-2019-0039
P. Muller, Michael Böhm, P. Csillag, M. Donati, M. Drut, Hugo Ferrer‐Pérez, L. Gauvrit, J. Gil, V. Hoang, A. Malak-Rawlikowska, K. Mattas, O. Napasintuwong, A. Nguyễn, I. Papadopoulos, B. Ristić, Žaklina Stojanović, Á. Török, E. Tsakiridou, M. Veneziani, V. Bellassen
{"title":"认证供应链是否更具社会可持续性?议价能力分析","authors":"P. Muller, Michael Böhm, P. Csillag, M. Donati, M. Drut, Hugo Ferrer‐Pérez, L. Gauvrit, J. Gil, V. Hoang, A. Malak-Rawlikowska, K. Mattas, O. Napasintuwong, A. Nguyễn, I. Papadopoulos, B. Ristić, Žaklina Stojanović, Á. Török, E. Tsakiridou, M. Veneziani, V. Bellassen","doi":"10.1515/jafio-2019-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Food quality schemes (FQS: organic and geographical indication products) are often supposed to be more sustainable by their political advocates. We explore the social sustainability advantage of FQS through the lens of supply chains’ bargaining power (BP) distribution. We propose an indicator synthesizing different sources underlying BP (competition-based, transactional, institutional) and counting two dimensions (fair BP distribution and adaptation capacity), that we apply to 18 FQS supply chains and corresponding reference. FQS perform better than their reference products on both dimensions. This better performance is due to a combination of sources.","PeriodicalId":52541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jafio-2019-0039","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Certified Supply Chains More Socially Sustainable? A Bargaining Power Analysis\",\"authors\":\"P. Muller, Michael Böhm, P. Csillag, M. Donati, M. Drut, Hugo Ferrer‐Pérez, L. Gauvrit, J. Gil, V. Hoang, A. Malak-Rawlikowska, K. Mattas, O. Napasintuwong, A. Nguyễn, I. Papadopoulos, B. Ristić, Žaklina Stojanović, Á. Török, E. Tsakiridou, M. Veneziani, V. Bellassen\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jafio-2019-0039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Food quality schemes (FQS: organic and geographical indication products) are often supposed to be more sustainable by their political advocates. We explore the social sustainability advantage of FQS through the lens of supply chains’ bargaining power (BP) distribution. We propose an indicator synthesizing different sources underlying BP (competition-based, transactional, institutional) and counting two dimensions (fair BP distribution and adaptation capacity), that we apply to 18 FQS supply chains and corresponding reference. FQS perform better than their reference products on both dimensions. This better performance is due to a combination of sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jafio-2019-0039\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jafio-2019-0039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jafio-2019-0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

摘要食品质量计划(FQS:有机和地理标志产品)通常被其政治倡导者认为更具可持续性。我们从供应链议价能力(BP)分布的角度探讨了FQS的社会可持续性优势。我们提出了一个指标,综合了BP的不同来源(基于竞争的、交易的、机构的),并计算了两个维度(公平的BP分配和适应能力),我们将其应用于18个FQS供应链并提供相应的参考。FQS在两个维度上都优于其参考产品。这种更好的性能是由于多种来源的结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are Certified Supply Chains More Socially Sustainable? A Bargaining Power Analysis
Abstract Food quality schemes (FQS: organic and geographical indication products) are often supposed to be more sustainable by their political advocates. We explore the social sustainability advantage of FQS through the lens of supply chains’ bargaining power (BP) distribution. We propose an indicator synthesizing different sources underlying BP (competition-based, transactional, institutional) and counting two dimensions (fair BP distribution and adaptation capacity), that we apply to 18 FQS supply chains and corresponding reference. FQS perform better than their reference products on both dimensions. This better performance is due to a combination of sources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization
Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization (JAFIO) is a unique forum for empirical and theoretical research in industrial organization with a special focus on agricultural and food industries worldwide. As concentration, industrialization, and globalization continue to reshape horizontal and vertical relationships within the food supply chain, agricultural economists are revising both their views of traditional markets as well as their tools of analysis. At the core of this revision are strategic interactions between principals and agents, strategic interdependence between rival firms, and strategic trade policy between competing nations, all in a setting plagued by incomplete and/or imperfect information structures. Add to that biotechnology, electronic commerce, as well as the shift in focus from raw agricultural commodities to branded products, and the conclusion is that a "new" agricultural economics is needed for an increasingly complex "new" agriculture.
期刊最新文献
Implementing Antitrust Regulations in Dynamic Industries: The Case of the U.S. Cottonseed Industry Pandemic Produce: Impacts of COVID-19 on Florida’s Fruit and Vegetable Industries The Impact of COVID-19 on World Oil Producers: Time is Important COVID-19 Impacts on United States Crawfish Impacts of COVID-19 on U.S. Seafood Availability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1