英国脱欧后比利时、德国和荷兰破产的影响

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW European Review of Private Law Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.54648/erpl2022005
Louise Castin
{"title":"英国脱欧后比利时、德国和荷兰破产的影响","authors":"Louise Castin","doi":"10.54648/erpl2022005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The one principle that is central to EU legislation on private international law, is that of mutual trust. States leaving the Union also leave that realm of mutual trust. That was the fate of the United Kingdom, as it officially left the union on 31 January 2020. UK Cross-border insolvency procedures started after the ending of the transition period on 31 December 2020 do not benefit from that principle anymore. The effect of these procedures in the different EU Member States is regulated by their own residual national framework. This article seeks to compare the recognition and execution frameworks of Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. The question is raised whether further harmonization is needed.","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Post-Brexit Insolvencies in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands\",\"authors\":\"Louise Castin\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/erpl2022005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The one principle that is central to EU legislation on private international law, is that of mutual trust. States leaving the Union also leave that realm of mutual trust. That was the fate of the United Kingdom, as it officially left the union on 31 January 2020. UK Cross-border insolvency procedures started after the ending of the transition period on 31 December 2020 do not benefit from that principle anymore. The effect of these procedures in the different EU Member States is regulated by their own residual national framework. This article seeks to compare the recognition and execution frameworks of Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. The question is raised whether further harmonization is needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Review of Private Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Review of Private Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2022005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2022005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟国际私法立法的核心原则是相互信任。脱离欧盟的国家也离开了相互信任的领域。这就是英国的命运,英国于2020年1月31日正式脱离欧盟。2020年12月31日过渡期结束后开始的英国跨境破产程序不再受益于该原则。这些程序在不同欧盟成员国的效果由其自身的剩余国家框架来监管。本文试图比较比利时、德国和荷兰的承认和执行框架。有人提出是否需要进一步协调的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effects of Post-Brexit Insolvencies in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands
The one principle that is central to EU legislation on private international law, is that of mutual trust. States leaving the Union also leave that realm of mutual trust. That was the fate of the United Kingdom, as it officially left the union on 31 January 2020. UK Cross-border insolvency procedures started after the ending of the transition period on 31 December 2020 do not benefit from that principle anymore. The effect of these procedures in the different EU Member States is regulated by their own residual national framework. This article seeks to compare the recognition and execution frameworks of Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. The question is raised whether further harmonization is needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Dealing With the Unpredictable: The Impact of the Covid-19 Crisis on Lease Agreements in the Italian and Japanese Legal Systems The CISG and European Private Law: When in Rome, Do as the Romans Do In memoriam Rodolfo Sacco Der Allgemeine Teil des neuen chinesischen Zivilgesetzbuchs im Vergleich zum deutschen BGB (Teil 1): Eine rechtswissenschaftliche und -terminologische Untersuchung der Rechtssubjektsregelungen Subrogation: An Unidentified Legal Object? A Proposal for a Solution to the Renowned Problem of the Legal Construction of Subrogation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1