学生团队成果分工型与团队辅助个体化合作学习对学生数学沟通技能的影响比较

IF 1.3 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Database Management Pub Date : 2020-09-16 DOI:10.26858/jdm.v8i2.9148
Mutmainnah Tahir, Thamrin Tayeb, Muh. Rusydi Rasyid, F. Nur, M. Munawarah
{"title":"学生团队成果分工型与团队辅助个体化合作学习对学生数学沟通技能的影响比较","authors":"Mutmainnah Tahir, Thamrin Tayeb, Muh. Rusydi Rasyid, F. Nur, M. Munawarah","doi":"10.26858/jdm.v8i2.9148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The study aimed to compare the cooperative learning model of Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) and Team Assisted individualization (TAI) types on the mathematical communication skill of class VIII students of State Junior High School 3 Sungguminasa of Gowa Regency. It was quasi-experimental research with non-equivalent control group design. The study population was all the students of class VIII of State Junior High School 3 Sungguminasa. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis with independent sample t-test were used in analysing the data. Based on the results of the descriptive statistical analysis, the mean score of the students' mathematical communication skill using cooperative learning model of STAD type was about 65.63% at the high category and the rest score was at the very high category; while the mean score of the students’ mathematical communication skill using the cooperative learning model of TAI type was about 62.5% at the high category and the rest score was at very high category. Based on the inferential analysis, it was obtained the results that there were the differences of the mean scores of the students’ mathematical communication skill who possessed the STAD and TAI learning types, and TAI learning type was more effective than the STAD learning type to enhance the students' mathematical communication skill.","PeriodicalId":51086,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Database Management","volume":"8 1","pages":"175-181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cooperative Learning Comparison of Student Teams Achievement Division Type and Teams Assisted Individualization type Toward The Students’ Mathematical Communication Skill\",\"authors\":\"Mutmainnah Tahir, Thamrin Tayeb, Muh. Rusydi Rasyid, F. Nur, M. Munawarah\",\"doi\":\"10.26858/jdm.v8i2.9148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: The study aimed to compare the cooperative learning model of Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) and Team Assisted individualization (TAI) types on the mathematical communication skill of class VIII students of State Junior High School 3 Sungguminasa of Gowa Regency. It was quasi-experimental research with non-equivalent control group design. The study population was all the students of class VIII of State Junior High School 3 Sungguminasa. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis with independent sample t-test were used in analysing the data. Based on the results of the descriptive statistical analysis, the mean score of the students' mathematical communication skill using cooperative learning model of STAD type was about 65.63% at the high category and the rest score was at the very high category; while the mean score of the students’ mathematical communication skill using the cooperative learning model of TAI type was about 62.5% at the high category and the rest score was at very high category. Based on the inferential analysis, it was obtained the results that there were the differences of the mean scores of the students’ mathematical communication skill who possessed the STAD and TAI learning types, and TAI learning type was more effective than the STAD learning type to enhance the students' mathematical communication skill.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Database Management\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"175-181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Database Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26858/jdm.v8i2.9148\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Database Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26858/jdm.v8i2.9148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究旨在比较学生团队成就组(STAD)和团队辅助个性化(TAI)类型的合作学习模式对高洼县国立初中三年级八班学生数学沟通技能的影响。这是一项准实验研究,采用非等效对照组设计。研究对象为国立初中三年级八班的所有学生。数据分析采用描述性和推断性统计分析,独立样本t检验。基于描述性统计分析的结果,学生使用STAD型合作学习模型的数学沟通技能的平均得分在高类别约为65.63%,其余得分在非常高类别;而使用TAI型合作学习模式的学生的数学交流技能的平均得分在高类别中约为62.5%,其余得分在非常高类别中。基于推理分析,结果表明,具有STAD和TAI学习类型的学生数学沟通技能的平均得分存在差异,并且TAI学习型比STAD学习型更能有效地提高学生的数学沟通技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Cooperative Learning Comparison of Student Teams Achievement Division Type and Teams Assisted Individualization type Toward The Students’ Mathematical Communication Skill
Abstract: The study aimed to compare the cooperative learning model of Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) and Team Assisted individualization (TAI) types on the mathematical communication skill of class VIII students of State Junior High School 3 Sungguminasa of Gowa Regency. It was quasi-experimental research with non-equivalent control group design. The study population was all the students of class VIII of State Junior High School 3 Sungguminasa. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis with independent sample t-test were used in analysing the data. Based on the results of the descriptive statistical analysis, the mean score of the students' mathematical communication skill using cooperative learning model of STAD type was about 65.63% at the high category and the rest score was at the very high category; while the mean score of the students’ mathematical communication skill using the cooperative learning model of TAI type was about 62.5% at the high category and the rest score was at very high category. Based on the inferential analysis, it was obtained the results that there were the differences of the mean scores of the students’ mathematical communication skill who possessed the STAD and TAI learning types, and TAI learning type was more effective than the STAD learning type to enhance the students' mathematical communication skill.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Database Management
Journal of Database Management 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
23.10%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Journal of Database Management (JDM) publishes original research on all aspects of database management, design science, systems analysis and design, and software engineering. The primary mission of JDM is to be instrumental in the improvement and development of theory and practice related to information technology, information systems, and management of knowledge resources. The journal is targeted at both academic researchers and practicing IT professionals.
期刊最新文献
Handling Imbalanced Data With Weighted Logistic Regression and Propensity Score Matching methods RDF(S) Store in Object-Relational Databases A Sample-Aware Database Tuning System With Deep Reinforcement Learning Narrativization in Information Systems Development Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Job Automation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1