{"title":"作为回应","authors":"B. Lincoln","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn response to the other articles in this issue, the author stresses the need to compare concrete examples, rather than general categories and reflects on the ethical problems arising from his earlier discussion of Edward Hunt’s published variant of Acoma myth, a text that Acoma tribal authorities reject and consider a betrayal of their traditions and authority.","PeriodicalId":44982,"journal":{"name":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15700682-12341493","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"By Way of Response\",\"authors\":\"B. Lincoln\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15700682-12341493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nIn response to the other articles in this issue, the author stresses the need to compare concrete examples, rather than general categories and reflects on the ethical problems arising from his earlier discussion of Edward Hunt’s published variant of Acoma myth, a text that Acoma tribal authorities reject and consider a betrayal of their traditions and authority.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15700682-12341493\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341493\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341493","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
In response to the other articles in this issue, the author stresses the need to compare concrete examples, rather than general categories and reflects on the ethical problems arising from his earlier discussion of Edward Hunt’s published variant of Acoma myth, a text that Acoma tribal authorities reject and consider a betrayal of their traditions and authority.
期刊介绍：
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion publishes articles, notes, book reviews and letters which explicitly address the problems of methodology and theory in the academic study of religion. This includes such traditional points of departure as history, philosophy, anthropology and sociology, but also the natural sciences, and such newer disciplinary approaches as feminist theory and studies. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion also concentrates on the critical analysis of theoretical problems prominent in the study of religion.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
