今天的隐私权:历史视角和巴西情景

M. V. Cancelier
{"title":"今天的隐私权:历史视角和巴西情景","authors":"M. V. Cancelier","doi":"10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N76P213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This  paper  aims  to  present  an  overview  of  the  evolution  of  the  right  to  privacy,  incorporated  in  our  legal  system  by  the 1988 Constitution and later the Civil Code  of  2002.  This  malleable  right  is  extremely  sensitive  to  social  changes.  Recognizing  privacy  as  a  volatile  legal  object,  the  article  shows that the context in which privacy rights  are inserted is essential to its effectiveness. The  work  respects  the  deductive  method,  starting  with the analysis of the first steps of the right to  privacy as an autonomous figure, ending with  its current interpretation by the Supreme Court.","PeriodicalId":30170,"journal":{"name":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","volume":"38 1","pages":"213-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N76P213","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O direito à privacidade hoje: perspectiva histórica e o cenário brasileiro\",\"authors\":\"M. V. Cancelier\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N76P213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This  paper  aims  to  present  an  overview  of  the  evolution  of  the  right  to  privacy,  incorporated  in  our  legal  system  by  the 1988 Constitution and later the Civil Code  of  2002.  This  malleable  right  is  extremely  sensitive  to  social  changes.  Recognizing  privacy  as  a  volatile  legal  object,  the  article  shows that the context in which privacy rights  are inserted is essential to its effectiveness. The  work  respects  the  deductive  method,  starting  with the analysis of the first steps of the right to  privacy as an autonomous figure, ending with  its current interpretation by the Supreme Court.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"213-240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N76P213\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N76P213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N76P213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文旨在概述隐私权的演变,1988年《宪法》和后来的2002年《民法典》将隐私权纳入了我国的法律体系。这种可延展的权利对社会变化极为敏感。文章承认隐私是一个不稳定的法律对象,表明隐私权的插入背景对其有效性至关重要。这部作品尊重演绎法,从分析作为一个自主人物的隐私权的第一步开始,到最高法院目前对其的解释结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O direito à privacidade hoje: perspectiva histórica e o cenário brasileiro
This  paper  aims  to  present  an  overview  of  the  evolution  of  the  right  to  privacy,  incorporated  in  our  legal  system  by  the 1988 Constitution and later the Civil Code  of  2002.  This  malleable  right  is  extremely  sensitive  to  social  changes.  Recognizing  privacy  as  a  volatile  legal  object,  the  article  shows that the context in which privacy rights  are inserted is essential to its effectiveness. The  work  respects  the  deductive  method,  starting  with the analysis of the first steps of the right to  privacy as an autonomous figure, ending with  its current interpretation by the Supreme Court.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Justice and equality for all? Proportional representation in Belgium and France (1883-1921) A interligação entre a Lei Anticorrupção e o Direito dos Desastres Controle de Integridade e Administração Pública: sinergias necessárias As soluções traçadas no Ordenamento Jurídico Português para o problema do lucro da intervenção Post-Modern Narratives and the Paradigm of Efficiency: participatory democracy on the yellow brick road
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1