大流行是变革的门户:挑战南非“正常教育”的极限

IF 0.8 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education As Change Pub Date : 2021-08-31 DOI:10.25159/1947-9417/8718
P. Christie
{"title":"大流行是变革的门户:挑战南非“正常教育”的极限","authors":"P. Christie","doi":"10.25159/1947-9417/8718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Starting from the position that inequalities in schooling in South Africa are well known, this article suggests pausing the impulse to “return to normal” in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic and instead questioning the operations, assumptions and effects of what is considered “normal”. It uses Michel Foucault’s concepts of governmentality and dispositif to argue that the pandemic not only exposes the structural inequalities in schooling;it also exposes the confusing enmeshment of governmental processes and logics that produce and normalise these. Given the complex social and economic inequalities in South Africa, the article questions the limits of governmental capacity to meet its own stated aims of equal provisioning of schooling for all, using the provision of water to schools as an illustrative case. The article concludes by arguing for the importance of pressing against the assumptions of “normal schooling” with its embedded inequalities, and it sets out the ethical challenge for working for change. © The Author(s) 2021.","PeriodicalId":44983,"journal":{"name":"Education As Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The pandemic as a portal for change: Pushing against the limits of “normal schooling” in south africa\",\"authors\":\"P. Christie\",\"doi\":\"10.25159/1947-9417/8718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Starting from the position that inequalities in schooling in South Africa are well known, this article suggests pausing the impulse to “return to normal” in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic and instead questioning the operations, assumptions and effects of what is considered “normal”. It uses Michel Foucault’s concepts of governmentality and dispositif to argue that the pandemic not only exposes the structural inequalities in schooling;it also exposes the confusing enmeshment of governmental processes and logics that produce and normalise these. Given the complex social and economic inequalities in South Africa, the article questions the limits of governmental capacity to meet its own stated aims of equal provisioning of schooling for all, using the provision of water to schools as an illustrative case. The article concludes by arguing for the importance of pressing against the assumptions of “normal schooling” with its embedded inequalities, and it sets out the ethical challenge for working for change. © The Author(s) 2021.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education As Change\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education As Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/8718\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education As Change","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/8718","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文从南非教育不平等现象众所周知的立场出发,建议在COVID-19大流行面前暂停“回归正常”的冲动,而是质疑所谓“正常”的运作、假设和影响。书中使用了米歇尔•福柯(Michel Foucault)关于治理和处置的概念,认为这场大流行不仅暴露了学校教育中的结构性不平等,还暴露了产生和规范这些不平等的政府程序和逻辑的混乱纠缠。鉴于南非复杂的社会和经济不平等,本文以向学校供水为例,质疑政府在实现其宣称的人人平等受教育目标方面的能力是否有限。文章最后论证了反对“正常学校教育”的假设及其根深蒂固的不平等的重要性,并提出了为变革而努力的道德挑战。©作者2021。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The pandemic as a portal for change: Pushing against the limits of “normal schooling” in south africa
Starting from the position that inequalities in schooling in South Africa are well known, this article suggests pausing the impulse to “return to normal” in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic and instead questioning the operations, assumptions and effects of what is considered “normal”. It uses Michel Foucault’s concepts of governmentality and dispositif to argue that the pandemic not only exposes the structural inequalities in schooling;it also exposes the confusing enmeshment of governmental processes and logics that produce and normalise these. Given the complex social and economic inequalities in South Africa, the article questions the limits of governmental capacity to meet its own stated aims of equal provisioning of schooling for all, using the provision of water to schools as an illustrative case. The article concludes by arguing for the importance of pressing against the assumptions of “normal schooling” with its embedded inequalities, and it sets out the ethical challenge for working for change. © The Author(s) 2021.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education As Change
Education As Change EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Education as Change is an accredited, peer reviewed scholarly online journal that publishes original articles reflecting critically on issues of equality in education and on the ways in which educational practices contribute to transformation in non-formal, formal and informal contexts. Critique, mainly understood in the tradition of critical pedagogies, is a constructive process which contributes towards a better world. Contributions from and about marginalised communities and from different knowledge traditions are encouraged. The articles could draw on any rigorous research methodology, as well as transdisciplinary approaches. Research of a very specialised or technical nature should be framed within relevant discourses. While specialised kinds of research are encouraged, authors are expected to write for a broader audience of educational researchers and practitioners without losing conceptual and theoretical depth and rigour. All sectors of education are covered in the journal. These include primary, secondary and tertiary education, adult education, worker education, educational policy and teacher education.
期刊最新文献
Vocational Education and Graduate Struggles in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: A Freirean Approach Unveiling the Employability Landscape: Chinese International Doctoral Students in Malaysian Universities Bibliometric Coloniality in South Africa: Critical Review of the Indexes of Accredited Journals Educide as Genocide in Palestine “Our Identity is Our Dignity”: Digital Transformations: Palestinian Aspirations, Idealism, Reality and Pragmatism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1