心理灵活性、焦虑和抑郁:认知融合、经验回避和激活的调节作用。

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psicothema Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.7334/psicothema2021.344
C. Fernández-Rodríguez, Rocío Coto-Lesmes, V. Martínez-Loredo, Marcelino Cuesta-Izquierdo
{"title":"心理灵活性、焦虑和抑郁:认知融合、经验回避和激活的调节作用。","authors":"C. Fernández-Rodríguez, Rocío Coto-Lesmes, V. Martínez-Loredo, Marcelino Cuesta-Izquierdo","doi":"10.7334/psicothema2021.344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nEvidence about how cognitive fusion (CF) and experiential avoidance (EA) interact with emotional distress underlines the importance of analyzing the interrelationships between the different processes of psychological inflexibility in order to improve ways of addressing emotional problems. This study analyzes the moderating effect of CF, EA and activation (A) in relation to four criteria of anxiety and depression.\n\n\nMETHOD\nA cross-sectional study of a clinical sample of adults was carried out by means of a questionnaire administered before (N = 172) and 6 months after (N = 114) participation in a clinical study.\n\n\nRESULTS\nRegression analyses gave results which were consistent in the two evaluations. The EAxCF interaction modulated anxiety symptomatology, whereas A was not a significant predictor. Nevertheless, a reduction in A was the principal modulating condition in the symptomatology of depression; and although CF and EA did act as independent predictors, the EAxCF interaction was not significant.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe presence and intensity of manifestations of emotional distress are explained and modulated by the progressive concurrence of CF, EA and reduction in A. The use of therapeutic approaches which increase activation could be a beneficial strategy with regard to decreasing cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance.","PeriodicalId":48179,"journal":{"name":"Psicothema","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological Inflexibility, Anxiety and Depression: The Moderating Role of Cognitive Fusion, Experiential Avoidance and Activation.\",\"authors\":\"C. Fernández-Rodríguez, Rocío Coto-Lesmes, V. Martínez-Loredo, Marcelino Cuesta-Izquierdo\",\"doi\":\"10.7334/psicothema2021.344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nEvidence about how cognitive fusion (CF) and experiential avoidance (EA) interact with emotional distress underlines the importance of analyzing the interrelationships between the different processes of psychological inflexibility in order to improve ways of addressing emotional problems. This study analyzes the moderating effect of CF, EA and activation (A) in relation to four criteria of anxiety and depression.\\n\\n\\nMETHOD\\nA cross-sectional study of a clinical sample of adults was carried out by means of a questionnaire administered before (N = 172) and 6 months after (N = 114) participation in a clinical study.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nRegression analyses gave results which were consistent in the two evaluations. The EAxCF interaction modulated anxiety symptomatology, whereas A was not a significant predictor. Nevertheless, a reduction in A was the principal modulating condition in the symptomatology of depression; and although CF and EA did act as independent predictors, the EAxCF interaction was not significant.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nThe presence and intensity of manifestations of emotional distress are explained and modulated by the progressive concurrence of CF, EA and reduction in A. The use of therapeutic approaches which increase activation could be a beneficial strategy with regard to decreasing cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psicothema\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psicothema\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.344\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicothema","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.344","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景关于认知融合(CF)和经验回避(EA)如何与情绪困扰相互作用的证据强调了分析心理不灵活的不同过程之间的相互关系以改进解决情绪问题的方法的重要性。本研究分析了CF、EA和激活(A)对焦虑和抑郁四个标准的调节作用。方法采用参与临床研究前(N=172)和参与临床研究后6个月(N=114)的问卷调查对成人临床样本进行横断面研究。结果偏离分析给出的结果在两个评价中是一致的。EAxCF的相互作用调节了焦虑症状,而A并不是一个显著的预测因素。然而,a的减少是抑郁症症状的主要调节条件;尽管CF和EA确实是独立的预测因子,但EAxCF的相互作用并不显著。结论情绪困扰表现的存在和强度可以通过CF、EA和A的减少来解释和调节。使用增加激活的治疗方法可能是减少认知融合和体验回避的有益策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychological Inflexibility, Anxiety and Depression: The Moderating Role of Cognitive Fusion, Experiential Avoidance and Activation.
BACKGROUND Evidence about how cognitive fusion (CF) and experiential avoidance (EA) interact with emotional distress underlines the importance of analyzing the interrelationships between the different processes of psychological inflexibility in order to improve ways of addressing emotional problems. This study analyzes the moderating effect of CF, EA and activation (A) in relation to four criteria of anxiety and depression. METHOD A cross-sectional study of a clinical sample of adults was carried out by means of a questionnaire administered before (N = 172) and 6 months after (N = 114) participation in a clinical study. RESULTS Regression analyses gave results which were consistent in the two evaluations. The EAxCF interaction modulated anxiety symptomatology, whereas A was not a significant predictor. Nevertheless, a reduction in A was the principal modulating condition in the symptomatology of depression; and although CF and EA did act as independent predictors, the EAxCF interaction was not significant. CONCLUSIONS The presence and intensity of manifestations of emotional distress are explained and modulated by the progressive concurrence of CF, EA and reduction in A. The use of therapeutic approaches which increase activation could be a beneficial strategy with regard to decreasing cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psicothema
Psicothema PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: La revista Psicothema fue fundada en Asturias en 1989 y está editada conjuntamente por la Facultad y el Departamento de Psicología de la Universidad de Oviedo y el Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias. Publica cuatro números al año. Se admiten trabajos tanto de investigación básica como aplicada, pertenecientes a cualquier ámbito de la Psicología, que previamente a su publicación son evaluados anónimamente por revisores externos. Psicothema está incluida en las bases de datos nacionales e internacionales más relevantes, entre las que cabe destacar Psychological Abstracts, Current Contents y MEDLINE/Index Medicus, entre otras. Además, figura en las listas de Factor de Impacto del Journal Citation Reports. Psicothema es una revista abierta a cualquier enfoque u orientación psicológica que venga avalada por la fuerza de los datos y los argumentos, y en la que encuentran acomodo todos los autores que sean capaces de convencer a los revisores de que sus manuscritos tienen la calidad para ser publicados. Psicothema es una revista de acceso abierto lo que significa que todo el contenido está a disposición de cualquier usuario o institución sin cargo alguno. Los usuarios pueden leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar, o realizar enlaces a los textos completos de esta revista sin pedir permiso previo al editor o al autor, siempre y cuando la fuente original sea referenciada. Para acervos y repositorios, se prefiere que la cobertura se realice mediante enlaces a la propia web de Psicothema. Nos parece que una apuesta decidida por la calidad es el mejor modo de servir a nuestros lectores, cuyas sugerencias siempre serán bienvenidas.
期刊最新文献
Facing Fear and Embracing Safety: Validation of the COVID-19 Psychosocial Scales in Essential Frontline Workers During the Pandemic. Giftedness and Family Well-being: The Role of Emotional Intelligence, Perceived Social Support and Stress. Nighttime Fears and Coping Responses in School-Aged Children: A Latent Profile Analysis. Online Gendered Violence Victimization Among Adults: Prevalence, Predictors and Psychological Outcomes. Psychometric Properties of the Online Version of the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7): A Longitudinal Study in Pregnant and Postpartum Spanish Women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1