“WaSH未来主义”:利用名义群体技术探索可持续发展目标6后的目标,以实现更公平的全球议程设置

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 WATER RESOURCES Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development Pub Date : 2023-08-03 DOI:10.2166/washdev.2023.246
G. Hales, Bushra Hasan, Oscar Balongo, Jay Meshvania, Reychel Sanchez-Martinez, Charles Shachinda, P. Hutchings, James Bartram
{"title":"“WaSH未来主义”:利用名义群体技术探索可持续发展目标6后的目标,以实现更公平的全球议程设置","authors":"G. Hales, Bushra Hasan, Oscar Balongo, Jay Meshvania, Reychel Sanchez-Martinez, Charles Shachinda, P. Hutchings, James Bartram","doi":"10.2166/washdev.2023.246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG6) is grounded in human rights and derives from international policies refined over decades. We argue that much of this agenda setting and monitoring reflects or gives way to neo-colonialism and neo-liberalism. We implement an online version of the Nominal Group Technique to explore its efficacy for more equitable global agenda setting. We apply the technique to a group of 19 graduate WaSH students – from diverse professional backgrounds and originating from and having worked in all global regions – to gain their insights on future WaSH issues to be included in global targets. This was preceded by preparatory exercises on WaSH progress and influential contextual factors. We thus demonstrate a novel and systematic application of the NGT and discuss its potential to be used in challenging neo-colonial and neo-liberal agenda setting. The results also provide an early assessment of future priorities that could inform post-SDG target setting including: inclusivity among populations and settings, hygiene, menstrual health, sustainability, circular economy, climate resilience, preventing infectious disease transmission, and universal ‘safely managed services’. These are compared with themes highlighted in Joint Monitoring Programme reports, SDG6 indicators and General Comment 15: The Human Right to Water.","PeriodicalId":48893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘WaSH Futurism’: exploring post-SDG6 targets using the Nominal Group Technique for more equitable global agenda setting\",\"authors\":\"G. Hales, Bushra Hasan, Oscar Balongo, Jay Meshvania, Reychel Sanchez-Martinez, Charles Shachinda, P. Hutchings, James Bartram\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/washdev.2023.246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG6) is grounded in human rights and derives from international policies refined over decades. We argue that much of this agenda setting and monitoring reflects or gives way to neo-colonialism and neo-liberalism. We implement an online version of the Nominal Group Technique to explore its efficacy for more equitable global agenda setting. We apply the technique to a group of 19 graduate WaSH students – from diverse professional backgrounds and originating from and having worked in all global regions – to gain their insights on future WaSH issues to be included in global targets. This was preceded by preparatory exercises on WaSH progress and influential contextual factors. We thus demonstrate a novel and systematic application of the NGT and discuss its potential to be used in challenging neo-colonial and neo-liberal agenda setting. The results also provide an early assessment of future priorities that could inform post-SDG target setting including: inclusivity among populations and settings, hygiene, menstrual health, sustainability, circular economy, climate resilience, preventing infectious disease transmission, and universal ‘safely managed services’. These are compared with themes highlighted in Joint Monitoring Programme reports, SDG6 indicators and General Comment 15: The Human Right to Water.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2023.246\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2023.246","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可持续发展目标6 (SDG6)以人权为基础,源自几十年来不断完善的国际政策。我们认为,这种议程设定和监督在很大程度上反映了新殖民主义和新自由主义,或者让位于它们。我们实施了名义团体技术的在线版本,以探索其对更公平的全球议程设置的功效。我们将该技术应用于一组19名来自不同专业背景、来自全球所有地区并在全球所有地区工作过的讲卫生研究生,以获得他们对未来将纳入全球目标的讲卫生问题的见解。在此之前,进行了关于讲卫生运动进展和有影响的背景因素的筹备工作。因此,我们展示了NGT的一种新颖而系统的应用,并讨论了它在挑战新殖民主义和新自由主义议程设置方面的潜力。研究结果还提供了对未来优先事项的早期评估,可为可持续发展目标后的具体目标设定提供信息,包括:人口和环境之间的包容性、卫生、月经健康、可持续性、循环经济、气候适应能力、预防传染病传播和普遍的“安全管理服务”。将这些与联合监测方案报告、可持续发展目标6指标和第15号一般性意见(水权)中强调的主题进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘WaSH Futurism’: exploring post-SDG6 targets using the Nominal Group Technique for more equitable global agenda setting
Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG6) is grounded in human rights and derives from international policies refined over decades. We argue that much of this agenda setting and monitoring reflects or gives way to neo-colonialism and neo-liberalism. We implement an online version of the Nominal Group Technique to explore its efficacy for more equitable global agenda setting. We apply the technique to a group of 19 graduate WaSH students – from diverse professional backgrounds and originating from and having worked in all global regions – to gain their insights on future WaSH issues to be included in global targets. This was preceded by preparatory exercises on WaSH progress and influential contextual factors. We thus demonstrate a novel and systematic application of the NGT and discuss its potential to be used in challenging neo-colonial and neo-liberal agenda setting. The results also provide an early assessment of future priorities that could inform post-SDG target setting including: inclusivity among populations and settings, hygiene, menstrual health, sustainability, circular economy, climate resilience, preventing infectious disease transmission, and universal ‘safely managed services’. These are compared with themes highlighted in Joint Monitoring Programme reports, SDG6 indicators and General Comment 15: The Human Right to Water.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the dissemination of high-quality information on the science, policy and practice of drinking-water supply, sanitation and hygiene at local, national and international levels.
期刊最新文献
Socioeconomic predictors of access to improved water sources, sanitation facilities, and household water treatment in Nigeria WASH practices increased the prevalence of malnutrition among under-five children (6–59 months) in an urban slum area in Ibadan, Nigeria Enhancing rural drinking water safety using a Mg–Al-type layered double hydroxide foil as a new point-of-use disinfection tool Occurrence of Acanthamoeba spp. in a major river in the Philippines: impact on water quality and health WASH FIT implementation in Rohingya camps in Cox's Bazar Bangladesh – results after 1 year
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1