统一编码策略对联想识别定向遗忘效应的影响

Yujuan Wang, Changxing Liu, Bingbing Li
{"title":"统一编码策略对联想识别定向遗忘效应的影响","authors":"Yujuan Wang, Changxing Liu, Bingbing Li","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-6554.2019.12.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the influence of unitization encoding strategy and the moderating effect of unitization level on directed forgetting effect of associative recognition. \n \n \nMethods \nAssociation recognition paradigm combined with directed forgetting paradigm were employed in this study.The 39 participants acquired by simple random sampling were asked to remember or forget compound words or unrelated word pairs which were randomly presented according to cues.In the retrieval stage, they needed to distinguish \" old\" or \" rearranged\" word pairs regardless of the cues. \n \n \nResults \n(1) The reversed unitization effect reached significance. The discrimination of compound words (0.43±0.03) was lower than that of unrelated words (0.55±0.03) (F=27.27, P<0.001, ηp2=0.42). For the word pairs (to be remembered, TBR), the discrimination of compound words (0.43±0.03) was lower than that of unrelated words (0.59±0.03) (t=-6.05, P<0.001); for the word pairs (to be forgotten, TBF), the discrimination of compound words (0.43±0.03) was still lower than that of unrelated words (0.50±0.04) (t=-2.30, P=0.025). (2) The directed forgetting effect of associative recognition was significant.However, TBR (0.51±0.03) was more discriminative than TBF (0.46±0.03) (F=4.30, P=0.045, ηp2=0.10). But the difference was mainly reflected in the recognition of unrelated words.TBR (0.59±0.03) was more discriminative than TBF (0.50±0.04) (t=3.19, P=0.003). However, there was no significant difference between TBR (0.43±0.03) and TBF (0.43±0.03) in recognition of compound words. \n \n \nConclusion \nThe unitization encoding stratege can simultaneously promote hit rate and false alarm rate.The directed forgetting effect can be eliminated when unitization level is high enough. \n \n \nKey words: \nAssociative recognition; Directed forgetting; Unitization encoding; Unitization level; Familiarity","PeriodicalId":9940,"journal":{"name":"中华行为医学与脑科学杂志","volume":"28 1","pages":"1113-1117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of unitization encoding strategy on directed forgetting effect of associative recognition\",\"authors\":\"Yujuan Wang, Changxing Liu, Bingbing Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-6554.2019.12.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo investigate the influence of unitization encoding strategy and the moderating effect of unitization level on directed forgetting effect of associative recognition. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nAssociation recognition paradigm combined with directed forgetting paradigm were employed in this study.The 39 participants acquired by simple random sampling were asked to remember or forget compound words or unrelated word pairs which were randomly presented according to cues.In the retrieval stage, they needed to distinguish \\\" old\\\" or \\\" rearranged\\\" word pairs regardless of the cues. \\n \\n \\nResults \\n(1) The reversed unitization effect reached significance. The discrimination of compound words (0.43±0.03) was lower than that of unrelated words (0.55±0.03) (F=27.27, P<0.001, ηp2=0.42). For the word pairs (to be remembered, TBR), the discrimination of compound words (0.43±0.03) was lower than that of unrelated words (0.59±0.03) (t=-6.05, P<0.001); for the word pairs (to be forgotten, TBF), the discrimination of compound words (0.43±0.03) was still lower than that of unrelated words (0.50±0.04) (t=-2.30, P=0.025). (2) The directed forgetting effect of associative recognition was significant.However, TBR (0.51±0.03) was more discriminative than TBF (0.46±0.03) (F=4.30, P=0.045, ηp2=0.10). But the difference was mainly reflected in the recognition of unrelated words.TBR (0.59±0.03) was more discriminative than TBF (0.50±0.04) (t=3.19, P=0.003). However, there was no significant difference between TBR (0.43±0.03) and TBF (0.43±0.03) in recognition of compound words. \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nThe unitization encoding stratege can simultaneously promote hit rate and false alarm rate.The directed forgetting effect can be eliminated when unitization level is high enough. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nAssociative recognition; Directed forgetting; Unitization encoding; Unitization level; Familiarity\",\"PeriodicalId\":9940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华行为医学与脑科学杂志\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"1113-1117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华行为医学与脑科学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-6554.2019.12.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华行为医学与脑科学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-6554.2019.12.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨单位化编码策略和单位化水平对联想识别定向遗忘效应的调节作用。方法采用联想识别范式和定向遗忘范式相结合的研究方法。通过简单随机抽样获得的39名参与者被要求记住或忘记根据线索随机呈现的复合词或无关词对。在检索阶段,他们需要区分“旧的”或“重新排列的”单词对,而不考虑线索。结果(1)逆转单元化效果显著。复合词的辨别力(0.43±0.03)低于无关词的辨别能力(0.55±0.03)(F=27.27,P<0.001,ηp2=0.42)。在待记忆词对(TBR)中,复合词的分辨力(0.44±0.03)小于无关词的分辨能力(0.59±0.03),t=-6.05,P<0.001);对于待遗忘词对,复合词的辨别力(0.43±0.03)仍低于非相关词的辨别能力(0.50±0.04)(t=-2.30,P=0.025)。(2)联想识别的定向遗忘效应显著。然而,TBR(0.51±0.03)比TBF(0.46±0.03)更有鉴别力(F=4.30,P=0.045,ηp2=0.10),但差异主要体现在对无关词的识别上。TBR(0.59±0.03)比TBF(0.50±0.04)更有鉴别力(t=3.19,P=0.003),但在识别复合词方面,TBR(0.43±0.03)和TBF(0.43士0.03)没有显著差异。结论统一编码策略可以同时提高命中率和虚警率。当单元化水平足够高时,定向遗忘效应可以被消除。关键词:联想识别;定向遗忘;单位化编码;单元化水平;熟悉程度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The influence of unitization encoding strategy on directed forgetting effect of associative recognition
Objective To investigate the influence of unitization encoding strategy and the moderating effect of unitization level on directed forgetting effect of associative recognition. Methods Association recognition paradigm combined with directed forgetting paradigm were employed in this study.The 39 participants acquired by simple random sampling were asked to remember or forget compound words or unrelated word pairs which were randomly presented according to cues.In the retrieval stage, they needed to distinguish " old" or " rearranged" word pairs regardless of the cues. Results (1) The reversed unitization effect reached significance. The discrimination of compound words (0.43±0.03) was lower than that of unrelated words (0.55±0.03) (F=27.27, P<0.001, ηp2=0.42). For the word pairs (to be remembered, TBR), the discrimination of compound words (0.43±0.03) was lower than that of unrelated words (0.59±0.03) (t=-6.05, P<0.001); for the word pairs (to be forgotten, TBF), the discrimination of compound words (0.43±0.03) was still lower than that of unrelated words (0.50±0.04) (t=-2.30, P=0.025). (2) The directed forgetting effect of associative recognition was significant.However, TBR (0.51±0.03) was more discriminative than TBF (0.46±0.03) (F=4.30, P=0.045, ηp2=0.10). But the difference was mainly reflected in the recognition of unrelated words.TBR (0.59±0.03) was more discriminative than TBF (0.50±0.04) (t=3.19, P=0.003). However, there was no significant difference between TBR (0.43±0.03) and TBF (0.43±0.03) in recognition of compound words. Conclusion The unitization encoding stratege can simultaneously promote hit rate and false alarm rate.The directed forgetting effect can be eliminated when unitization level is high enough. Key words: Associative recognition; Directed forgetting; Unitization encoding; Unitization level; Familiarity
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8131
期刊介绍: "Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science" (CN 37-1468/R, ISSN 1674-6554) is a national academic journal under the supervision of the National Health Commission, sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and Jining Medical College. The journal was founded in June 1992 and was formerly known as "Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine" (1992-1993) and "Chinese Behavioral Medical Science" (1994-2008). In 2009, it was renamed "Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science" with the approval of the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television. The purpose of "Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science" is to implement the health and health policies of the Party and the State, implement the principle of combining theory with practice and popularization and improvement, and reflect the major progress in the theory and practical application of behavioral medicine and brain science in my country. It publishes academic papers and scientific research results in the field of behavioral medicine and brain science in my country, and has columns such as monographs/reviews, basic research, clinical research, health prevention, methods and techniques, psychological behavior and evaluation, and systematic evaluation.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive function characteristics in patients with myasthenia gravis Association of endocannabinoid and its metabolic enzymes with severity in children with autism spectrum disorder The role of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA in the remission of aggression behavior in socially isolated mice and the mechanism of 5-serotonin-2C receptor Correlation of total magnetic resonance imaging burden with homocysteine in patients with cerebral small vessel disease Effect of behavioral intervention on the prognosis of patients with carotid artery stenting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1