利用MAMCA分析评价克罗地亚海港的发展伙伴关系方案

IF 0.5 Q4 TRANSPORTATION Pomorstvo-Scientific Journal of Maritime Research Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.31217/p.36.1.16
Ana Perić Hadžić
{"title":"利用MAMCA分析评价克罗地亚海港的发展伙伴关系方案","authors":"Ana Perić Hadžić","doi":"10.31217/p.36.1.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to evaluate development partnership scenarios of the seaports in the Republic of Croatia using the Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis (MAMCA). Previous author’s research indicated a number of effects and criteria that PPPs need to achieve in order to ensure sustainable port development. However, implementation of partnership models in seaports in the Republic of Croatia has not reached its full potential although there has been significant progress over the last ten years. For that reason, the evaluation of the partnership models in Croatian seaports is a poorly researched issue. The author has defined three models of port development according to the degree of private investors’ involvement in Croatian ports (status quo, minimal participation and maximal participation of private sector). The author uses MAMCA as a tool to evaluate the PPP model, using relevant criteria for the evaluation of public-private partnerships (economical-financial, organizational, technical-technological, social criteria and the criteria aiming at harmonization with the policies of the European Union), from relevant stakeholders’ point of view (public interest, private interest and the interest of the wider community). The research results show that the best-evaluated model is maximal participation of private sector. It has positive influence on port development from economic and technological side, it directly contributes to different stakeholder’s interests, and in the long term, it contributes to the local community development.","PeriodicalId":44047,"journal":{"name":"Pomorstvo-Scientific Journal of Maritime Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of development partnership scenarios of the Croatian seaports using MAMCA analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ana Perić Hadžić\",\"doi\":\"10.31217/p.36.1.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is to evaluate development partnership scenarios of the seaports in the Republic of Croatia using the Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis (MAMCA). Previous author’s research indicated a number of effects and criteria that PPPs need to achieve in order to ensure sustainable port development. However, implementation of partnership models in seaports in the Republic of Croatia has not reached its full potential although there has been significant progress over the last ten years. For that reason, the evaluation of the partnership models in Croatian seaports is a poorly researched issue. The author has defined three models of port development according to the degree of private investors’ involvement in Croatian ports (status quo, minimal participation and maximal participation of private sector). The author uses MAMCA as a tool to evaluate the PPP model, using relevant criteria for the evaluation of public-private partnerships (economical-financial, organizational, technical-technological, social criteria and the criteria aiming at harmonization with the policies of the European Union), from relevant stakeholders’ point of view (public interest, private interest and the interest of the wider community). The research results show that the best-evaluated model is maximal participation of private sector. It has positive influence on port development from economic and technological side, it directly contributes to different stakeholder’s interests, and in the long term, it contributes to the local community development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pomorstvo-Scientific Journal of Maritime Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pomorstvo-Scientific Journal of Maritime Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31217/p.36.1.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pomorstvo-Scientific Journal of Maritime Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31217/p.36.1.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文的目的是利用多参与者多标准分析(MAMCA)来评估克罗地亚共和国海港的发展伙伴关系方案。前作者的研究表明,为了确保港口的可持续发展,ppp需要达到一些效果和标准。然而,在克罗地亚共和国的海港实施伙伴关系模式尚未充分发挥其潜力,尽管在过去十年中取得了重大进展。因此,对克罗地亚海港的伙伴关系模式的评价是一个缺乏研究的问题。作者根据私人投资者参与克罗地亚港口的程度确定了三种港口发展模式(现状、最低参与和私营部门最大参与)。作者使用MAMCA作为评估PPP模式的工具,从相关利益相关者的角度(公共利益、私人利益和更广泛的社区利益),使用评估公私伙伴关系的相关标准(经济-金融、组织、技术-技术、社会标准和旨在与欧盟政策协调一致的标准)。研究结果表明,最优评价模式是民营企业最大参与。它从经济和技术方面对港口发展有积极的影响,它直接有助于不同利益相关者的利益,从长远来看,它有助于当地社区的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of development partnership scenarios of the Croatian seaports using MAMCA analysis
The aim of this paper is to evaluate development partnership scenarios of the seaports in the Republic of Croatia using the Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis (MAMCA). Previous author’s research indicated a number of effects and criteria that PPPs need to achieve in order to ensure sustainable port development. However, implementation of partnership models in seaports in the Republic of Croatia has not reached its full potential although there has been significant progress over the last ten years. For that reason, the evaluation of the partnership models in Croatian seaports is a poorly researched issue. The author has defined three models of port development according to the degree of private investors’ involvement in Croatian ports (status quo, minimal participation and maximal participation of private sector). The author uses MAMCA as a tool to evaluate the PPP model, using relevant criteria for the evaluation of public-private partnerships (economical-financial, organizational, technical-technological, social criteria and the criteria aiming at harmonization with the policies of the European Union), from relevant stakeholders’ point of view (public interest, private interest and the interest of the wider community). The research results show that the best-evaluated model is maximal participation of private sector. It has positive influence on port development from economic and technological side, it directly contributes to different stakeholder’s interests, and in the long term, it contributes to the local community development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis and Comparison of Main Steam Turbines from Four Different Thermal Power Plants International Marine Tourism A Port Entry Risk Assessment Model Based on Bayesian Networks and Elements of the e-Navigation Concept Mechanical Properties Evaluation of Laminated Composites of Petung Bamboo (Dendrocalamus asper) and Coconut Coir Fiber as Ship Construction Components Traffic Microsimulation of the Main Junction Connecting the Urban Road Network with the Sea-Port Container Terminal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1