{"title":"将观点纳入医疗政策","authors":"Tim Arnold, Helen J. A. Fuller, D. Wilson","doi":"10.1177/2327857923121022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes a set of approaches for evaluating and designing healthcare policy content. These approaches draw from multiple viewpoints in human factors, systems thinking, safety science, and human-centered design (HCD). Six groupings of approaches drawing from different viewpoints are included that address philosophical underpinnings, policy networks and information systems, embedded references to available expertise, customizable modular elements, usability and HCD, and linguistic considerations. For each grouping, an example is provided along with lessons learned and limitations of each approach. Because these approaches emphasize different vantage points and flexibility in design, they can be useful for inquiring into a variety of policy design considerations. Viewing bodies of policy through these perspectives can help us to address questions about how they support healthcare work and how they may work as a system of policies together towards positive outcomes.","PeriodicalId":74550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","volume":"12 1","pages":"89 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weaving viewpoints into healthcare policy\",\"authors\":\"Tim Arnold, Helen J. A. Fuller, D. Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2327857923121022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes a set of approaches for evaluating and designing healthcare policy content. These approaches draw from multiple viewpoints in human factors, systems thinking, safety science, and human-centered design (HCD). Six groupings of approaches drawing from different viewpoints are included that address philosophical underpinnings, policy networks and information systems, embedded references to available expertise, customizable modular elements, usability and HCD, and linguistic considerations. For each grouping, an example is provided along with lessons learned and limitations of each approach. Because these approaches emphasize different vantage points and flexibility in design, they can be useful for inquiring into a variety of policy design considerations. Viewing bodies of policy through these perspectives can help us to address questions about how they support healthcare work and how they may work as a system of policies together towards positive outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"89 - 93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857923121022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857923121022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文描述了一套评估和设计医疗保健政策内容的方法。这些方法从人为因素、系统思维、安全科学和以人为本的设计(HCD)等多个角度出发。其中包括六组从不同角度出发的方法,涉及哲学基础、政策网络和信息系统、对现有专业知识的嵌入式参考、可定制的模块化元素、可用性和HCD以及语言考虑。对于每一组,都提供了一个例子,以及每种方法的经验教训和局限性。由于这些方法强调了设计中的不同优势和灵活性,因此它们可以用于探究各种政策设计考虑因素。从这些角度看待政策体系可以帮助我们解决它们如何支持医疗保健工作以及它们如何作为一个政策体系共同努力取得积极成果的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Weaving viewpoints into healthcare policy
This paper describes a set of approaches for evaluating and designing healthcare policy content. These approaches draw from multiple viewpoints in human factors, systems thinking, safety science, and human-centered design (HCD). Six groupings of approaches drawing from different viewpoints are included that address philosophical underpinnings, policy networks and information systems, embedded references to available expertise, customizable modular elements, usability and HCD, and linguistic considerations. For each grouping, an example is provided along with lessons learned and limitations of each approach. Because these approaches emphasize different vantage points and flexibility in design, they can be useful for inquiring into a variety of policy design considerations. Viewing bodies of policy through these perspectives can help us to address questions about how they support healthcare work and how they may work as a system of policies together towards positive outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CHARACTERIZING PHYSICAL STRAIN IN NON-ROUTINIZED CLINICAL WORK THROUGH OBSERVATION: AN EXAMPLE OF ORAL HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS. Toward Joint Activity Design: Augmenting User-Centered Design with Heuristics for Supporting Joint Activity. Cracking The Code: Redesigning EHR Interfaces to Clarify Patients’ End of Life Wishes for Code Situations Considering Team Dynamics during Human Factors Work in Healthcare Preventing Hospital-Acquired Venous Thrombosis Embolism in Medical Patients Admitted to Acute Care Hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1