首页 > 最新文献

Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare最新文献

英文 中文
CHARACTERIZING PHYSICAL STRAIN IN NON-ROUTINIZED CLINICAL WORK THROUGH OBSERVATION: AN EXAMPLE OF ORAL HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS. 通过观察描述非程序化临床工作中的体力负荷:以口腔医疗服务提供者为例。
Yiyang Fang, Jay M Kapellusch, Nancy A Baker, Shawn C Roll

The Revised Strain Index (RSI), despite its prevalence in ergonomics field practice, is designed to assess jobs with cyclic and predictable physical and behavioral patterns. The quantification of exertion force, posture, and work task duration is substantially more challenging for non-routinized work in clinical and hospital environments. Using dental hygiene work as an exemplar, we proposed a consolidated method to characterize physical exertion for non-routinized work. We conducted the RSI adaptation process in two phases. In phase one, we characterized exertion in non-routinized work and identified representative intensity and posture patterns. In phase two, we validated the consolidated method using a small subset of dental hygiene video recordings and compared the results to the conventional sampling method.

尽管 "订正劳损指数"(RSI)在人体工程学领域的实践中非常普遍,但它是为评估具有周期性和可预测的体力和行为模式的工作而设计的。而对于临床和医院环境中的非程序化工作而言,对用力、姿势和工作任务持续时间进行量化则更具挑战性。我们以牙科卫生工作为例,提出了一种综合方法来描述非路线化工作的体力消耗。我们分两个阶段进行 RSI 适应过程。在第一阶段,我们描述了非程序化工作中的体力消耗,并确定了具有代表性的强度和姿势模式。在第二阶段,我们使用一小部分牙科卫生视频记录对综合方法进行了验证,并将结果与传统取样方法进行了比较。
{"title":"CHARACTERIZING PHYSICAL STRAIN IN NON-ROUTINIZED CLINICAL WORK THROUGH OBSERVATION: AN EXAMPLE OF ORAL HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS.","authors":"Yiyang Fang, Jay M Kapellusch, Nancy A Baker, Shawn C Roll","doi":"10.1177/2327857924131015","DOIUrl":"10.1177/2327857924131015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Revised Strain Index (RSI), despite its prevalence in ergonomics field practice, is designed to assess jobs with cyclic and predictable physical and behavioral patterns. The quantification of exertion force, posture, and work task duration is substantially more challenging for non-routinized work in clinical and hospital environments. Using dental hygiene work as an exemplar, we proposed a consolidated method to characterize physical exertion for non-routinized work. We conducted the RSI adaptation process in two phases. In phase one, we characterized exertion in non-routinized work and identified representative intensity and posture patterns. In phase two, we validated the consolidated method using a small subset of dental hygiene video recordings and compared the results to the conventional sampling method.</p>","PeriodicalId":74550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","volume":"13 1","pages":"134-139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11485167/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142482681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Proxy Users for Usability Testing of Medical Devices for Use in Sub-Saharan Africa 撒哈拉以南非洲医疗器械可用性测试的代理用户
Shababa B Matin, E. Asma, Elizabeth Allen, Lucky Mangwiro, Rowland Mjumira, Maureen Valle, C. Acemyan, Maria Oden, K. Kawaza, P. Kortum, Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Medical device implementation in global health requires careful considerations around usability and the use of proxy user groups. Working with appropriate proxy users can address the cost burden of conducting international studies with target users. This study evaluated whether proxy users are a practical substitution for conducting usability testing on devices for implementation in low-resource international settings. Identical usability studies were conducted with 18 clinicians from Blantyre, Malawi, and a carefully selected proxy group of 13 clinicians from Houston, Texas, U.S.A., across seven newborn-focused medical devices. Task success rate, System Usability Scale (SUS) scores, and NASA-Task Load (NASA TLX) scores from the two groups were compared. No significant differences were found between groups other than NASA-TLX temporal demand sub-scale, showing it is possible to use a carefully selected proxy group for usability evaluation in international settings. However, there was no consistent agreement between the groups on a task level, indicating that proxy groups should be used with an abundance of caution. Studies with target users must be additionally conducted to confirm results. Further work needs to be done with a larger sample size to test the viability of a proxy group for international studies on medical devices.
医疗设备在全球健康中的实施需要仔细考虑可用性和代理用户组的使用。与适当的代理用户合作可以解决与目标用户进行国际研究的成本负担。这项研究评估了代理用户是否是在低资源的国际环境中对设备进行可用性测试的实际替代品。对来自马拉维布兰太尔的18名临床医生和来自美国得克萨斯州休斯顿的13名临床医生组成的精心选择的代理小组进行了相同的可用性研究,涉及7种新的聚焦医疗设备。比较两组的任务成功率、系统可用性量表(SUS)得分和NASA任务负荷(NASA TLX)得分。除了NASA-TLX时间需求子量表之外,其他组之间没有发现显著差异,这表明在国际环境中使用精心选择的代理组进行可用性评估是可能的。然而,各小组在任务层面上没有达成一致意见,这表明应谨慎使用代理小组。必须额外对目标用户进行研究以确认结果。需要用更大的样本量进行进一步的工作,以测试国际医疗器械研究代理小组的可行性。
{"title":"Proxy Users for Usability Testing of Medical Devices for Use in Sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"Shababa B Matin, E. Asma, Elizabeth Allen, Lucky Mangwiro, Rowland Mjumira, Maureen Valle, C. Acemyan, Maria Oden, K. Kawaza, P. Kortum, Rebecca Richards-Kortum","doi":"10.1177/2327857923121047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857923121047","url":null,"abstract":"Medical device implementation in global health requires careful considerations around usability and the use of proxy user groups. Working with appropriate proxy users can address the cost burden of conducting international studies with target users. This study evaluated whether proxy users are a practical substitution for conducting usability testing on devices for implementation in low-resource international settings. Identical usability studies were conducted with 18 clinicians from Blantyre, Malawi, and a carefully selected proxy group of 13 clinicians from Houston, Texas, U.S.A., across seven newborn-focused medical devices. Task success rate, System Usability Scale (SUS) scores, and NASA-Task Load (NASA TLX) scores from the two groups were compared. No significant differences were found between groups other than NASA-TLX temporal demand sub-scale, showing it is possible to use a carefully selected proxy group for usability evaluation in international settings. However, there was no consistent agreement between the groups on a task level, indicating that proxy groups should be used with an abundance of caution. Studies with target users must be additionally conducted to confirm results. Further work needs to be done with a larger sample size to test the viability of a proxy group for international studies on medical devices.","PeriodicalId":74550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","volume":"12 1","pages":"208 - 212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45629365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Screening Technologies to Support Infection Prevention and Control in Long-Term Care 支持长期护理感染预防和控制的筛查技术
Laura Wheeler, Maryam Attef, Chantal M. J. Trudel, A. Chan, Bruce Wallace
Many clinical environments implemented Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) screening technologies at entry points to identify and isolate cases. Despite the widespread adoption of screening technologies in vulnerable care settings, such as in long-term care (LTC) homes, implementations and protocols have yet to be thoroughly reviewed in the literature. Therefore, the Dynamic Sustainability Framework was applied to identify the limitations of various screening technology implementations. Based on identified limitations, design recommendations are put forward to support healthcare planning and design teams of long-term care homes, and clinical facilities to improve infection prevention and control (IPC).
许多临床环境在入境点实施了2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)筛查技术,以识别和隔离病例。尽管筛查技术在脆弱护理环境中广泛采用,如长期护理(LTC)家庭,但实施和协议尚未在文献中得到彻底审查。因此,动态可持续性框架被用于确定各种筛选技术实施的局限性。根据确定的局限性,提出了设计建议,以支持长期护理院和临床设施的医疗保健规划和设计团队,以改善感染预防和控制(IPC)。
{"title":"Screening Technologies to Support Infection Prevention and Control in Long-Term Care","authors":"Laura Wheeler, Maryam Attef, Chantal M. J. Trudel, A. Chan, Bruce Wallace","doi":"10.1177/2327857923121018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857923121018","url":null,"abstract":"Many clinical environments implemented Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) screening technologies at entry points to identify and isolate cases. Despite the widespread adoption of screening technologies in vulnerable care settings, such as in long-term care (LTC) homes, implementations and protocols have yet to be thoroughly reviewed in the literature. Therefore, the Dynamic Sustainability Framework was applied to identify the limitations of various screening technology implementations. Based on identified limitations, design recommendations are put forward to support healthcare planning and design teams of long-term care homes, and clinical facilities to improve infection prevention and control (IPC).","PeriodicalId":74550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","volume":"12 1","pages":"67 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42234903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conceptualization and iterative human-centered design of pharmacogenomic order checks 药物基因组顺序检查的概念化和迭代以人为本的设计
Margo Kabel, Tim Arnold, Jennifer G. Chapman, D. Voora, Jill Bates
The usability of healthcare information systems is vital to providing safe, effective, and efficient patient care. In this paper, we describe human centered design of pharmacogenomic (PGx) clinical decision support (CDS) systems. Operationalizing PGx-based care is a relatively new endeavor, and the complexity of this clinical space requires adapting human factors techniques to fashion usable designs. We had to consider multiple design tradeoffs including whether to group medications by drug class. In this article, we provide additional design tradeoff considerations and lessons learned. Including embedded human factors practices early and throughout as a key consideration for maturing a learning health system.
医疗保健信息系统的可用性对于提供安全、有效和高效的患者护理至关重要。在本文中,我们描述了以人为中心的药物基因组(PGx)临床决策支持(CDS)系统的设计。操作基于PGx的护理是一项相对较新的努力,而这一临床空间的复杂性需要将人为因素技术适应可用的设计。我们必须考虑多种设计权衡,包括是否按药物类别对药物进行分组。在本文中,我们提供了额外的设计权衡注意事项和经验教训。将早期和贯穿始终的嵌入式人为因素实践作为成熟学习健康系统的关键考虑因素。
{"title":"Conceptualization and iterative human-centered design of pharmacogenomic order checks","authors":"Margo Kabel, Tim Arnold, Jennifer G. Chapman, D. Voora, Jill Bates","doi":"10.1177/2327857923121008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857923121008","url":null,"abstract":"The usability of healthcare information systems is vital to providing safe, effective, and efficient patient care. In this paper, we describe human centered design of pharmacogenomic (PGx) clinical decision support (CDS) systems. Operationalizing PGx-based care is a relatively new endeavor, and the complexity of this clinical space requires adapting human factors techniques to fashion usable designs. We had to consider multiple design tradeoffs including whether to group medications by drug class. In this article, we provide additional design tradeoff considerations and lessons learned. Including embedded human factors practices early and throughout as a key consideration for maturing a learning health system.","PeriodicalId":74550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","volume":"12 1","pages":"31 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43090912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
TRUSTS Technology Integration Inventory: Assessing the Impact of a New Technology on Work System Resilience 信托技术集成清单:评估新技术对工作系统弹性的影响
E. Patterson, K. Neville, Stephen L. Dorton, Emily Barrett, Theresa Fersch, Andrew Langone, Bianica Pires, Kristine Rosfjord
We present the Transform with Resilience during Upgrades to Socio-Technical Systems (TRUSTS) Framework, which specifies sources of work system resilience. A work system is defined as elements, including technology, people, policies, protocols, and procedures, that cooperatively function to achieve shared goals. By describing sources of work system resilience, the framework can help a work system’s stakeholders preserve its resilience. This is especially important for high-consequence work systems; these are work systems involved in healthcare, military operations, and national airspace management, as examples. In these work systems, responsivity and adaptivity, i.e., resilience, are requisites to achieving missions and goals in the face of outages and other unexpected events, high demands, and nonroutine conditions. In event-driven environments, system resilience is also required to respond to routine variety produced by uncontrollable aspects of the work, such as treatment responses, weather, and adversary behaviors. The TRUSTS framework is derived from foundational literature in complex systems science and resilience engineering. We build upon prior research in resilience engineering. In that body of work, work system resilience has been defined by Erik Hollnagel and colleagues as based on four cornerstones: anticipating, monitoring, responding, and learning. Its fundamental principles have been described in David Woods’ Theory Graceful Extensibility and writings on complex systems’ adaptive capacity. These cornerstones and principles have typically been described as high-level system capabilities that are illustrated by examples. With TRUSTS, we identify detailed system characteristics and capabilities that afford those high-level cornerstones. The framework is organized into five inter-related factors (a.k.a. the “Big Five” factors) that allow a high-consequence work system and its operations to be responsive and adaptive in the face of challenges. Each of the “Big Five” consists of three to four sub-factors, and each sub-factor consists of two or more resilience requirements. The framework and our associated efforts to operationalize work system resilience are heavily informed by targeted analysis of case studies of new technologies introduced into high-consequence work operations, including healthcare work operations, and interviews with military planning and command and control experts. Currently, we are endeavoring to integrate the TRUSTS Framework into the development of new technologies for health care and other high-consequence work systems. Increasingly, technologies are designed to participate in core work system activities, such as assessment, decision making, planning, and resource brokering and allocation. In these roles, they become integral to the work of other system elements—both technological and human—and the work system as a whole; i.e., they are a part of that work system. When technologies have core roles such as these, t
我们提出了在升级到社会技术系统(信托)框架期间的弹性转换,该框架指定了工作系统弹性的来源。工作系统被定义为元素,包括技术、人员、政策、协议和程序,这些元素协同工作以实现共同的目标。通过描述工作系统弹性的来源,框架可以帮助工作系统的涉众保持其弹性。这对于高后果的工作系统尤其重要;例如,这些工作系统涉及医疗保健、军事行动和国家空域管理。在这些工作系统中,响应性和适应性,即弹性,是在面对中断和其他意外事件、高要求和非常规条件时实现任务和目标的必要条件。在事件驱动的环境中,还需要系统弹性来响应由工作的不可控方面(如治疗响应、天气和对手行为)产生的常规变化。信托框架来源于复杂系统科学和弹性工程的基础文献。我们建立在先前的弹性工程研究的基础上。在该工作主体中,Erik Hollnagel及其同事将工作系统弹性定义为基于四个基石:预测、监控、响应和学习。它的基本原理已经在David Woods的理论优美可扩展性和复杂系统的自适应能力的著作中描述。这些基石和原则通常被描述为通过示例说明的高级系统功能。通过信任,我们确定了提供这些高级基础的详细系统特征和功能。该框架被组织成五个相互关联的因素(又称“五大”因素),这些因素允许一个高后果的工作系统及其运作在面对挑战时做出反应和适应。“五大”中的每一个都由三到四个子因素组成,每个子因素由两个或更多的弹性需求组成。通过对引入高后果工作操作(包括医疗工作操作)的新技术的案例研究进行有针对性的分析,以及对军事规划、指挥和控制专家的采访,我们在实施工作系统弹性方面的框架和相关努力得到了大量信息。目前,我们正在努力将信托框架纳入医疗保健和其他重要工作系统新技术的开发中。越来越多的技术被设计为参与核心工作系统活动,例如评估、决策制定、计划,以及资源中介和分配。在这些角色中,他们成为其他系统要素(包括技术和人)以及整个工作系统的组成部分;也就是说,他们是工作系统的一部分。当技术具有诸如此类的核心作用时,它们更有可能无意中干扰工作系统所使用的一种或多种适应和适应不断变化的需求和条件的手段。他们也有更大的潜力为工作系统的弹性做出积极贡献。我们的目标是帮助开发人员关注他们的新技术将影响工作系统的适应性和弹性的方式。我们介绍了将信托框架弹性来源集成到技术开发中的持续工作,包括新开发的方法和工具,这些方法和工具共同实现了信托弹性感知开发(RAD)技术开发方法。RAD的目标是帮助确保新技术的设计有助于工作系统的弹性,而不是无意中损害工作系统的弹性。它确保技术开发以平衡的方式使工作系统效率和弹性受益,这是长期工作系统和任务成功所必需的。随着我们的医疗保健工作系统变得更加复杂和技术驱动,可以使用信托框架和RAD方法和工具来确保它们保持提供响应性患者护理和适应条件的安全性的能力。
{"title":"TRUSTS Technology Integration Inventory: Assessing the Impact of a New Technology on Work System Resilience","authors":"E. Patterson, K. Neville, Stephen L. Dorton, Emily Barrett, Theresa Fersch, Andrew Langone, Bianica Pires, Kristine Rosfjord","doi":"10.1177/2327857923121024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857923121024","url":null,"abstract":"We present the Transform with Resilience during Upgrades to Socio-Technical Systems (TRUSTS) Framework, which specifies sources of work system resilience. A work system is defined as elements, including technology, people, policies, protocols, and procedures, that cooperatively function to achieve shared goals. By describing sources of work system resilience, the framework can help a work system’s stakeholders preserve its resilience. This is especially important for high-consequence work systems; these are work systems involved in healthcare, military operations, and national airspace management, as examples. In these work systems, responsivity and adaptivity, i.e., resilience, are requisites to achieving missions and goals in the face of outages and other unexpected events, high demands, and nonroutine conditions. In event-driven environments, system resilience is also required to respond to routine variety produced by uncontrollable aspects of the work, such as treatment responses, weather, and adversary behaviors. The TRUSTS framework is derived from foundational literature in complex systems science and resilience engineering. We build upon prior research in resilience engineering. In that body of work, work system resilience has been defined by Erik Hollnagel and colleagues as based on four cornerstones: anticipating, monitoring, responding, and learning. Its fundamental principles have been described in David Woods’ Theory Graceful Extensibility and writings on complex systems’ adaptive capacity. These cornerstones and principles have typically been described as high-level system capabilities that are illustrated by examples. With TRUSTS, we identify detailed system characteristics and capabilities that afford those high-level cornerstones. The framework is organized into five inter-related factors (a.k.a. the “Big Five” factors) that allow a high-consequence work system and its operations to be responsive and adaptive in the face of challenges. Each of the “Big Five” consists of three to four sub-factors, and each sub-factor consists of two or more resilience requirements. The framework and our associated efforts to operationalize work system resilience are heavily informed by targeted analysis of case studies of new technologies introduced into high-consequence work operations, including healthcare work operations, and interviews with military planning and command and control experts. Currently, we are endeavoring to integrate the TRUSTS Framework into the development of new technologies for health care and other high-consequence work systems. Increasingly, technologies are designed to participate in core work system activities, such as assessment, decision making, planning, and resource brokering and allocation. In these roles, they become integral to the work of other system elements—both technological and human—and the work system as a whole; i.e., they are a part of that work system. When technologies have core roles such as these, t","PeriodicalId":74550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","volume":"12 1","pages":"101 - 102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41908972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Toward Joint Activity Design: Augmenting User-Centered Design with Heuristics for Supporting Joint Activity. 迈向联合活动设计:用启发式方法支持联合活动,增强以用户为中心的设计。
Aaron Cochran, Michael F Rayo

From their common roots in Human Factors Engineering, Human-Centered Design and Cognitive Systems Engineering have drifted into distinct fields over the past three decades, each developing beneficial heuristics, design patterns, and evaluation methods for designing for individuals and teams, respectively. GeoHAI, a clinical decision support application for preventing hospital-acquired infection, has yielded positive results in early usability testing and is expected to test positively in supporting joint activity, which will be measured through the novel implementation of Joint Activity Monitoring . The design and implementation of this application provide a demonstration of the possibilities and necessities to unify the work of Human-Centered Design and Cognitive Systems Engineering when designing technologies that are usable and useful to individuals engaged in joint activity with machine counterparts and other people. We are calling this unified process Joint Activity Design, which supports designing for machines to be good team players.

在过去的三十年里,以人为中心的设计(Human-Centered Design)和认知系统工程(Cognitive Systems Engineering)从它们在人因工程学(Human Factors Engineering)中的共同根源逐渐发展成为不同的领域,各自开发了有益的启发式方法、设计模式和评估方法,分别用于为个人和团队进行设计。GeoHAI是一款用于预防医院感染的临床决策支持应用程序,在早期可用性测试中取得了积极成果,预计在支持联合活动方面也将取得积极测试结果。该应用程序的设计和实施展示了在设计技术时,将以人为本的设计和认知系统工程的工作统一起来的可能性和必要性,这些技术对于与机器同行和其他人一起从事联合活动的人来说是可用和有用的。我们将这一统一过程称为 "联合活动设计"(Joint Activity Design),它支持将机器设计成优秀的团队成员。
{"title":"Toward Joint Activity Design: Augmenting User-Centered Design with Heuristics for Supporting Joint Activity.","authors":"Aaron Cochran, Michael F Rayo","doi":"10.1177/2327857923121006","DOIUrl":"10.1177/2327857923121006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>From their common roots in Human Factors Engineering, Human-Centered Design and Cognitive Systems Engineering have drifted into distinct fields over the past three decades, each developing beneficial heuristics, design patterns, and evaluation methods for designing for individuals and teams, respectively. <i>GeoHAI</i>, a clinical decision support application for preventing hospital-acquired infection, has yielded positive results in early usability testing and is expected to test positively in supporting joint activity, which will be measured through the novel implementation of Joint Activity Monitoring . The design and implementation of this application provide a demonstration of the possibilities and necessities to unify the work of Human-Centered Design and Cognitive Systems Engineering when designing technologies that are usable and useful to individuals engaged in joint activity with machine counterparts and other people. We are calling this unified process Joint Activity Design, which supports designing for machines to be good team players.</p>","PeriodicalId":74550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","volume":"12 1","pages":"19-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10263067/pdf/nihms-1904592.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9722498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Formative Usability Testing of TrachAlarm, a device that detects tracheostomy tube decannulation TrachAlarm的形成可用性测试,这是一种检测气管造口管拔管的设备
Jena Mota, G. Good, Dorothy Owens, Darleen Sawyer, Patrice D. Tremoulet
{"title":"Formative Usability Testing of TrachAlarm, a device that detects tracheostomy tube decannulation","authors":"Jena Mota, G. Good, Dorothy Owens, Darleen Sawyer, Patrice D. Tremoulet","doi":"10.1177/2327857923121046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857923121046","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","volume":"12 1","pages":"207 - 207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41527202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preventing Hospital-Acquired Venous Thrombosis Embolism in Medical Patients Admitted to Acute Care Hospitals 急诊医院住院病人院内获得性静脉血栓栓塞的预防
Alexandra Beam, Sommer Bulka, Jennifer Evans Goodwin, Nicole Mauck, Malaz Alissa, Jonathan Patrick
Venous thrombosis embolism (VTE) is a leading cause of preventable death in the nation and has been identified as a high priority quality metric for clinical improvement at MedStar Health. Not only do VTEs impact several financial and reputational quality programs, but they also effect patient outcomes and patient safety. In an effort to reduce hospital acquired VTEs, MedStar Health developed a multi-disciplinary task force that identified four primary areas of opportunity that will provide awareness, improve compliance, and enhance clinical workflows that will contribute to the reduction of VTEs.
静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)是美国可预防死亡的主要原因,已被MedStar Health确定为临床改进的高度优先质量指标。VTE不仅会影响几个财务和声誉质量项目,还会影响患者的结果和患者的安全。为了减少医院获得性VTE,MedStar Health成立了一个多学科工作组,确定了四个主要的机会领域,这些领域将提高认识、提高依从性,并加强有助于减少VTE的临床工作流程。
{"title":"Preventing Hospital-Acquired Venous Thrombosis Embolism in Medical Patients Admitted to Acute Care Hospitals","authors":"Alexandra Beam, Sommer Bulka, Jennifer Evans Goodwin, Nicole Mauck, Malaz Alissa, Jonathan Patrick","doi":"10.1177/2327857923121004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857923121004","url":null,"abstract":"Venous thrombosis embolism (VTE) is a leading cause of preventable death in the nation and has been identified as a high priority quality metric for clinical improvement at MedStar Health. Not only do VTEs impact several financial and reputational quality programs, but they also effect patient outcomes and patient safety. In an effort to reduce hospital acquired VTEs, MedStar Health developed a multi-disciplinary task force that identified four primary areas of opportunity that will provide awareness, improve compliance, and enhance clinical workflows that will contribute to the reduction of VTEs.","PeriodicalId":74550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","volume":"12 1","pages":"14 - 16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41328986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A celebration of the work of Richard Cook, MD: A pioneer in understanding accidents, safety, human factors, and resilience 庆祝医学博士Richard Cook的工作:他是理解事故、安全、人为因素和复原力的先驱
Michael F. O'Connor, David D. Woods, S. Perry, E. Patterson, M. Nunnally, C. Nemeth, R. Fairbanks, Y. Donchin, Yuval Bitan
Dr. Richard Cook was a physician, educator, scholar, and researcher. He was a brilliant thinker and writer. Richard's CV lists 41 peer reviewed publications, 39 conference proceedings, 6 technical reports, 30 books/book chapters that were cited about 10,000 times (as of September 2022). Richard has excelled in multiple careers and was remarkably giving of his time, devoting 100s of thousands of hours of his life presenting, debating, corresponding, mentoring, and challenging the world, in formal and informal settings, to mature toward more complex, realistic thinking about the world as a sociotechnical entity. Our community recognizes him mainly for his key role in the start and expansion of the patient safety movement. This paper presents quintessence from a panel session that honors Richard’s work. The 7 panelists and moderator present Richard’s legacy, introduce varied aspects of his work, and consider how we can take his legacy forward to cope with future challenges. It is a moment to step back, remind ourselves of patient safety’s evolution from the 90’s until today, the power of resilience for the future of healthcare complex systems, and how to build momentum that can succeed at scale.
理查德·库克博士是一位医生、教育家、学者和研究员。他是一位杰出的思想家和作家。Richard的简历列出了41份同行评审出版物、39份会议记录、6份技术报告、30本书/书籍章节,引用次数约为10000次(截至2022年9月)。理查德在多个职业生涯中表现出色,他非常投入自己的时间,在正式和非正式的环境中,他一生中投入了成百上千个小时的时间来展示、辩论、通信、指导和挑战世界,以成熟地将世界视为一个社会技术实体进行更复杂、更现实的思考。我们的社区认可他主要是因为他在患者安全运动的启动和扩大中发挥了关键作用。本文介绍了一个小组会议的精华,以表彰理查德的工作。7位小组成员和主持人介绍了Richard的遗产,介绍了他的工作的各个方面,并考虑如何推进他的遗产以应对未来的挑战。现在是时候退一步了,提醒我们自己从90年代到今天患者安全的演变,复杂医疗系统未来的韧性,以及如何建立能够大规模成功的势头。
{"title":"A celebration of the work of Richard Cook, MD: A pioneer in understanding accidents, safety, human factors, and resilience","authors":"Michael F. O'Connor, David D. Woods, S. Perry, E. Patterson, M. Nunnally, C. Nemeth, R. Fairbanks, Y. Donchin, Yuval Bitan","doi":"10.1177/2327857923121021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857923121021","url":null,"abstract":"Dr. Richard Cook was a physician, educator, scholar, and researcher. He was a brilliant thinker and writer. Richard's CV lists 41 peer reviewed publications, 39 conference proceedings, 6 technical reports, 30 books/book chapters that were cited about 10,000 times (as of September 2022). Richard has excelled in multiple careers and was remarkably giving of his time, devoting 100s of thousands of hours of his life presenting, debating, corresponding, mentoring, and challenging the world, in formal and informal settings, to mature toward more complex, realistic thinking about the world as a sociotechnical entity. Our community recognizes him mainly for his key role in the start and expansion of the patient safety movement. This paper presents quintessence from a panel session that honors Richard’s work. The 7 panelists and moderator present Richard’s legacy, introduce varied aspects of his work, and consider how we can take his legacy forward to cope with future challenges. It is a moment to step back, remind ourselves of patient safety’s evolution from the 90’s until today, the power of resilience for the future of healthcare complex systems, and how to build momentum that can succeed at scale.","PeriodicalId":74550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","volume":"12 1","pages":"82 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49356360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Designing to Drive Practice Change: Automated Extraction of Resident Clinical Experiences 设计驱动实践变革:住院医师临床经验的自动提取
Alexander Fidel, Mark V. Mai, Naveen Muthu, Adam C. Dziorny
Exposure to patients and clinical diagnoses drives learning in graduate medical education (GME). However, variation exists in the breadth of experiences. Measuring such variation would provide practice data to inform residents’ understanding of the breadth of their patient experiences. We have developed an automated system to identify resident provider-patient interactions (rPPIs) and demonstrated accurate attribution at a single institution. The objective of this study was to understand the landscape of trainee planned learning, and iteratively design a tool to be used for this goal. To achieve these objectives at two institutions new to the AMA “Advancing Change” initiative, we used a mixed-methods approach to develop and evaluate a “mid-point report” of patients encounters. Qualitative outcomes include a guided exploration of usefulness, usability, and intent to use, as well as understanding the resources trainees would use for learning and how our system may deliver these resources. Quantitative outcomes from a summative usability test of the midpoint report will include time on task, task completion rate, and proportion of trainees who perceive the report to be useful to identify gaps in clinical experiences and guide learning.
接触病人和临床诊断驱动研究生医学教育(GME)的学习。然而,经验的广度存在差异。测量这种差异将提供实践数据,以告知居民对其患者经验广度的理解。我们开发了一个自动化系统来识别住院医生与患者的互动(rppi),并在单一机构中证明了准确的归属。本研究的目的是了解受训人员计划学习的情况,并迭代地设计一个工具来实现这一目标。为了在两家新加入AMA“推进变革”倡议的机构中实现这些目标,我们使用混合方法来开发和评估患者遭遇的“中点报告”。定性结果包括对有用性、可用性和使用意图的指导探索,以及理解受训者将用于学习的资源以及我们的系统如何交付这些资源。中点报告总结性可用性测试的定量结果将包括任务完成时间、任务完成率以及认为报告有助于识别临床经验差距和指导学习的受训者比例。
{"title":"Designing to Drive Practice Change: Automated Extraction of Resident Clinical Experiences","authors":"Alexander Fidel, Mark V. Mai, Naveen Muthu, Adam C. Dziorny","doi":"10.1177/2327857923121026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857923121026","url":null,"abstract":"Exposure to patients and clinical diagnoses drives learning in graduate medical education (GME). However, variation exists in the breadth of experiences. Measuring such variation would provide practice data to inform residents’ understanding of the breadth of their patient experiences. We have developed an automated system to identify resident provider-patient interactions (rPPIs) and demonstrated accurate attribution at a single institution. The objective of this study was to understand the landscape of trainee planned learning, and iteratively design a tool to be used for this goal. To achieve these objectives at two institutions new to the AMA “Advancing Change” initiative, we used a mixed-methods approach to develop and evaluate a “mid-point report” of patients encounters. Qualitative outcomes include a guided exploration of usefulness, usability, and intent to use, as well as understanding the resources trainees would use for learning and how our system may deliver these resources. Quantitative outcomes from a summative usability test of the midpoint report will include time on task, task completion rate, and proportion of trainees who perceive the report to be useful to identify gaps in clinical experiences and guide learning.","PeriodicalId":74550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","volume":"12 1","pages":"108 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48198823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1