论议论文写作教学中的视觉思维策略

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Elementary School Journal Pub Date : 2020-08-06 DOI:10.1086/709984
K. Smolkowski, L. Strycker, L. Anderson, Peggy Marconi, Lisa Abia-Smith
{"title":"论议论文写作教学中的视觉思维策略","authors":"K. Smolkowski, L. Strycker, L. Anderson, Peggy Marconi, Lisa Abia-Smith","doi":"10.1086/709984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This pilot study evaluated a novel professional development (PD) model designed to prepare K–12 educators in high-need rural school districts to teach evidence-based argument writing. The PD model showed teachers how to engage students in discussions about visual art using Visual Thinking Strategies (VTS) to enhance students’ argumentation writing. Twenty intervention teachers completed the PD program and conducted lessons in VTS and argument writing. Intervention teachers, compared with 34 comparison teachers, improved their perceived knowledge of critical thinking concepts, ability to teach critical thinking concepts, knowledge of concepts related to argument writing, and actual ability to perceive and analyze artistic work and understand characteristics used to convey intent and meaning (Hedges’s g > 0.50). Students in the intervention condition (N = 210 in K–11) improved their argument writing skills. Given the quasi-experimental design and small sample size, these findings should be viewed with caution but suggest promise.","PeriodicalId":48010,"journal":{"name":"Elementary School Journal","volume":"121 1","pages":"100 - 124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/709984","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Visual Thinking Strategies Approach to Teaching Argument Writing\",\"authors\":\"K. Smolkowski, L. Strycker, L. Anderson, Peggy Marconi, Lisa Abia-Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/709984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This pilot study evaluated a novel professional development (PD) model designed to prepare K–12 educators in high-need rural school districts to teach evidence-based argument writing. The PD model showed teachers how to engage students in discussions about visual art using Visual Thinking Strategies (VTS) to enhance students’ argumentation writing. Twenty intervention teachers completed the PD program and conducted lessons in VTS and argument writing. Intervention teachers, compared with 34 comparison teachers, improved their perceived knowledge of critical thinking concepts, ability to teach critical thinking concepts, knowledge of concepts related to argument writing, and actual ability to perceive and analyze artistic work and understand characteristics used to convey intent and meaning (Hedges’s g > 0.50). Students in the intervention condition (N = 210 in K–11) improved their argument writing skills. Given the quasi-experimental design and small sample size, these findings should be viewed with caution but suggest promise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Elementary School Journal\",\"volume\":\"121 1\",\"pages\":\"100 - 124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/709984\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Elementary School Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/709984\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elementary School Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/709984","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本试点研究评估了一种新的专业发展(PD)模式,该模式旨在为高需求农村学区的K-12教育工作者准备以证据为基础的论证写作。PD模型向教师展示了如何使用视觉思维策略(VTS)让学生参与关于视觉艺术的讨论,以提高学生的议论文写作能力。20名干预教师完成了PD计划,并进行了VTS和论点写作的课程。与34名对照教师相比,干预教师对批判性思维概念的感知知识、教授批判性思维概念的能力、论证写作相关概念的知识、感知和分析艺术作品的实际能力以及理解用于传达意图和意义的特征的能力都有所提高(Hedges 's g > 0.50)。干预组学生(K-11班N = 210)的论文写作能力有所提高。考虑到准实验设计和小样本量,这些发现应该谨慎看待,但暗示着希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Visual Thinking Strategies Approach to Teaching Argument Writing
This pilot study evaluated a novel professional development (PD) model designed to prepare K–12 educators in high-need rural school districts to teach evidence-based argument writing. The PD model showed teachers how to engage students in discussions about visual art using Visual Thinking Strategies (VTS) to enhance students’ argumentation writing. Twenty intervention teachers completed the PD program and conducted lessons in VTS and argument writing. Intervention teachers, compared with 34 comparison teachers, improved their perceived knowledge of critical thinking concepts, ability to teach critical thinking concepts, knowledge of concepts related to argument writing, and actual ability to perceive and analyze artistic work and understand characteristics used to convey intent and meaning (Hedges’s g > 0.50). Students in the intervention condition (N = 210 in K–11) improved their argument writing skills. Given the quasi-experimental design and small sample size, these findings should be viewed with caution but suggest promise.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Elementary School Journal
Elementary School Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Elementary School Journal has served researchers, teacher educators, and practitioners in the elementary and middle school education for over one hundred years. ESJ publishes peer-reviewed articles dealing with both education theory and research and their implications for teaching practice. In addition, ESJ presents articles that relate the latest research in child development, cognitive psychology, and sociology to school learning and teaching. ESJ prefers to publish original studies that contain data about school and classroom processes in elementary or middle schools while occasionally publishing integrative research reviews and in-depth conceptual analyses of schooling.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation and optimization of sequence-based gene regulatory deep learning models. “It’s Just Something That You Have to Do as a Teacher” Front Matter 41 Teachers, 41 Different Ways Predictable Variation in the Implementation of a Curricular Intervention—and Why it Matters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1