{"title":"规划中权力和白人的结构性挑战——来自历史悠久的黑人墓地修复的证据","authors":"M. Gough, Kathryn L. Howell, Hannah Cameron","doi":"10.1080/14649357.2022.2113557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Historic Black cemeteries in the United States have been preserved and repaired by a range of philanthropic, community and government agencies. These efforts are fraught with disagreement over how to preserve sacred places. We consider the roles of white planners and organizations in Black spaces through a case examination of a cemetery restoration planning process. We engage questions of process and power to understand how outcomes-based approaches rationalize the reproduction of power relationships and the invisibility of whiteness. We find that limited engagement, inappropriate conceptual framing, and resistance to power sharing compromised the potential of Black power in Black spaces.","PeriodicalId":47693,"journal":{"name":"Planning Theory & Practice","volume":"23 1","pages":"536 - 555"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Structural Challenge of Power and Whiteness in Planning: Evidence From Historic Black Cemetery Restoration\",\"authors\":\"M. Gough, Kathryn L. Howell, Hannah Cameron\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14649357.2022.2113557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Historic Black cemeteries in the United States have been preserved and repaired by a range of philanthropic, community and government agencies. These efforts are fraught with disagreement over how to preserve sacred places. We consider the roles of white planners and organizations in Black spaces through a case examination of a cemetery restoration planning process. We engage questions of process and power to understand how outcomes-based approaches rationalize the reproduction of power relationships and the invisibility of whiteness. We find that limited engagement, inappropriate conceptual framing, and resistance to power sharing compromised the potential of Black power in Black spaces.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Planning Theory & Practice\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"536 - 555\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Planning Theory & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2022.2113557\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planning Theory & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2022.2113557","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Structural Challenge of Power and Whiteness in Planning: Evidence From Historic Black Cemetery Restoration
Abstract Historic Black cemeteries in the United States have been preserved and repaired by a range of philanthropic, community and government agencies. These efforts are fraught with disagreement over how to preserve sacred places. We consider the roles of white planners and organizations in Black spaces through a case examination of a cemetery restoration planning process. We engage questions of process and power to understand how outcomes-based approaches rationalize the reproduction of power relationships and the invisibility of whiteness. We find that limited engagement, inappropriate conceptual framing, and resistance to power sharing compromised the potential of Black power in Black spaces.
期刊介绍:
Planning Theory & Practice provides an international focus for the development of theory and practice in spatial planning and a forum to promote the policy dimensions of space and place. Published four times a year in conjunction with the Royal Town Planning Institute, London, it publishes original articles and review papers from both academics and practitioners with the aim of encouraging more effective, two-way communication between theory and practice. The Editors invite robustly researched papers which raise issues at the leading edge of planning theory and practice, and welcome papers on controversial subjects. Contributors in the early stages of their academic careers are encouraged, as are rejoinders to items previously published.