Ray Bradbury的《华氏451度》中的识字、文学与物种差异的产生

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE EXTRAPOLATION Pub Date : 2018-04-19 DOI:10.3828/EXTR.2018.3
Seán McCorry
{"title":"Ray Bradbury的《华氏451度》中的识字、文学与物种差异的产生","authors":"Seán McCorry","doi":"10.3828/EXTR.2018.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Postwar literature (and postwar SF in particular) is marked by a concern that emerging techno-cultural developments would undermine the sovereignty of the humanist subject. The mass production of culture and an increasing dependency on technologies were seen as inimical to individualism, literary culture, and human agency. In the same period, new research into the cognitive and behavioural capacities of nonhuman animals put further pressure on the exceptional status of the humanist subject. Drawing on recent work in posthumanist theory and animal studies, I produce a new reading of Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 in the light of this twofold crisis of human exceptionalism. I claim that Bradbury’s novel typifies a broader tendency in postwar culture to use animal life as a metric by which to gauge the supposed technological attenuation of subjectivity, and I explore how his pessimistic diagnosis of the emergent mass culture discovers a surprising conjuncture of human, animal, and technology in the postwar moment.","PeriodicalId":42992,"journal":{"name":"EXTRAPOLATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3828/EXTR.2018.3","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literacy, Bêtise, and the Production of Species Difference in Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451\",\"authors\":\"Seán McCorry\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/EXTR.2018.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Postwar literature (and postwar SF in particular) is marked by a concern that emerging techno-cultural developments would undermine the sovereignty of the humanist subject. The mass production of culture and an increasing dependency on technologies were seen as inimical to individualism, literary culture, and human agency. In the same period, new research into the cognitive and behavioural capacities of nonhuman animals put further pressure on the exceptional status of the humanist subject. Drawing on recent work in posthumanist theory and animal studies, I produce a new reading of Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 in the light of this twofold crisis of human exceptionalism. I claim that Bradbury’s novel typifies a broader tendency in postwar culture to use animal life as a metric by which to gauge the supposed technological attenuation of subjectivity, and I explore how his pessimistic diagnosis of the emergent mass culture discovers a surprising conjuncture of human, animal, and technology in the postwar moment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EXTRAPOLATION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3828/EXTR.2018.3\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EXTRAPOLATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/EXTR.2018.3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EXTRAPOLATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/EXTR.2018.3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

战后文学(尤其是战后科幻小说)的特点是担心新兴的技术文化发展会破坏人文主义主体的主权。文化的大规模生产和对技术的日益依赖被视为不利于个人主义、文学文化和人类能动性。与此同时,对非人类动物的认知和行为能力的新研究给人文学科的特殊地位带来了进一步的压力。根据最近在后人类主义理论和动物研究方面的工作,我根据人类例外论的双重危机,对雷·布拉德伯里的《华氏451度》进行了新的解读。我认为,布拉德伯里的小说代表了战后文化中一种更广泛的趋势,即用动物的生命作为衡量所谓的主体性技术衰减的标准,我还探讨了他对新兴大众文化的悲观诊断是如何发现战后人类、动物和技术的惊人结合的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Literacy, Bêtise, and the Production of Species Difference in Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451
Postwar literature (and postwar SF in particular) is marked by a concern that emerging techno-cultural developments would undermine the sovereignty of the humanist subject. The mass production of culture and an increasing dependency on technologies were seen as inimical to individualism, literary culture, and human agency. In the same period, new research into the cognitive and behavioural capacities of nonhuman animals put further pressure on the exceptional status of the humanist subject. Drawing on recent work in posthumanist theory and animal studies, I produce a new reading of Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 in the light of this twofold crisis of human exceptionalism. I claim that Bradbury’s novel typifies a broader tendency in postwar culture to use animal life as a metric by which to gauge the supposed technological attenuation of subjectivity, and I explore how his pessimistic diagnosis of the emergent mass culture discovers a surprising conjuncture of human, animal, and technology in the postwar moment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EXTRAPOLATION
EXTRAPOLATION LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
The Programming of Free Will in Anthony Burgess’s A Clockwork Orange Critiques of Domesticity in Ray Bradbury’s Cold War Fiction Nightmare Angels and Dreams of Flight: Transgressive Transcendence in J. G. Ballard’s Crash and The Unlimited Dream Compan y Nnedi Okorafor: Noor as Noir, Cyborg Hybridity, Identity, and Disability Death, History, and the Time Loop: The Subject/Object Relation in Vandana Singh’s “Somadeva: A Sky River Sutra”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1