《世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约执行指南》评注

Q2 Social Sciences Global Journal of Comparative Law Pub Date : 2019-04-05 DOI:10.1163/2211906X-00801004
Zheng Lin, K. V. D. Borght
{"title":"《世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约执行指南》评注","authors":"Zheng Lin, K. V. D. Borght","doi":"10.1163/2211906X-00801004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Conference of the Parties of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control has adopted Guidelines for the implementation of eight provisions of the Convention. Some legal scholars argue that the Guidelines are binding and efficacious. This paper rejects this assertion. It asserts that on a true and proper interpretation of the Guidelines on the basis of the rules of the Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties, they are nothing more than soft law.","PeriodicalId":38000,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/2211906X-00801004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commentary on the Guidelines for the Implementation of the who Framework Convention on Tobacco Control\",\"authors\":\"Zheng Lin, K. V. D. Borght\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/2211906X-00801004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Conference of the Parties of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control has adopted Guidelines for the implementation of eight provisions of the Convention. Some legal scholars argue that the Guidelines are binding and efficacious. This paper rejects this assertion. It asserts that on a true and proper interpretation of the Guidelines on the basis of the rules of the Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties, they are nothing more than soft law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Journal of Comparative Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/2211906X-00801004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Journal of Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906X-00801004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906X-00801004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

烟草控制框架公约缔约方大会通过了《公约》八项条款的执行指南。一些法律学者认为,《准则》具有约束力和有效性。本文驳斥了这一论断。它声称,在《维也纳条约法公约》规则的基础上对《准则》作出真实和适当的解释,这些准则只不过是软法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Commentary on the Guidelines for the Implementation of the who Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
The Conference of the Parties of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control has adopted Guidelines for the implementation of eight provisions of the Convention. Some legal scholars argue that the Guidelines are binding and efficacious. This paper rejects this assertion. It asserts that on a true and proper interpretation of the Guidelines on the basis of the rules of the Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties, they are nothing more than soft law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Journal of Comparative Law
Global Journal of Comparative Law Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Global Journal of Comparative Law is a peer reviewed periodical that provides a dynamic platform for the dissemination of ideas on comparative law and reports on developments in the field of comparative law from all parts of the world. In our contemporary globalized world, it is almost impossible to isolate developments in the law in one jurisdiction or society from another. At the same time, what is traditionally called comparative law is increasingly subsumed under aspects of International Law. The Global Journal of Comparative Law therefore aims to maintain the discipline of comparative legal studies as vigorous and dynamic by deepening the space for comparative work in its transnational context.
期刊最新文献
Access to Public Documents and Its Restrictions: a Reflection from the Perspectives of Brazil and Sweden Comparative Study of Selected Nigerian and Indian Labour Practices and the Law The Irony in the Lineage of Modern Chinese Constitutions and Constitutionalism Regulating Surrogacy as a Reproductive Practice in India and Sri Lanka Use of Specialized Tribunals for the Settlement of Construction Projects in Times of a Financial Crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1