前南斯拉夫问题国际刑事法庭定罪后的生活

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Journal of International Criminal Justice Pub Date : 2023-03-07 DOI:10.1093/jicj/mqad010
Lina Strupinskienė
{"title":"前南斯拉夫问题国际刑事法庭定罪后的生活","authors":"Lina Strupinskienė","doi":"10.1093/jicj/mqad010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Of the 92 persons convicted at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), 60 have already served their sentences and been released. Even though in post-conflict environments, the public behaviour of perpetrators can help counter (atrocity crime) denial, establish an authoritative version of the truth and contribute to sustainable reconciliation, we still know little about what happens once they return to their communities. This article is one of the first attempts to systematically map and understand what pathways the ICTY convicts take after release, and why. It finds that those who promote nationalist interpretations of the past and deny their responsibility and involvement in crimes are often hailed by receptive domestic audiences across the Western Balkans. They successfully use certain support networks, such as dominant political parties or military and war veterans’ organizations, to take back their place in public life. On the other hand, those convicts who have admitted their guilt and responsibility and do not promote a nationalist interpretation of the past often find themselves ostracized, living in poverty and seclusion.","PeriodicalId":46732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Criminal Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life After Conviction at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia\",\"authors\":\"Lina Strupinskienė\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jicj/mqad010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Of the 92 persons convicted at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), 60 have already served their sentences and been released. Even though in post-conflict environments, the public behaviour of perpetrators can help counter (atrocity crime) denial, establish an authoritative version of the truth and contribute to sustainable reconciliation, we still know little about what happens once they return to their communities. This article is one of the first attempts to systematically map and understand what pathways the ICTY convicts take after release, and why. It finds that those who promote nationalist interpretations of the past and deny their responsibility and involvement in crimes are often hailed by receptive domestic audiences across the Western Balkans. They successfully use certain support networks, such as dominant political parties or military and war veterans’ organizations, to take back their place in public life. On the other hand, those convicts who have admitted their guilt and responsibility and do not promote a nationalist interpretation of the past often find themselves ostracized, living in poverty and seclusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqad010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqad010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在前南斯拉夫问题国际刑事法庭(前南问题国际法庭)被定罪的92人中,有60人已经服刑并获释。尽管在冲突后环境中,犯罪者的公开行为有助于对抗(暴行犯罪)否认,建立权威的真相,并有助于可持续的和解,但我们仍然对他们返回社区后会发生什么知之甚少。这篇文章是系统地绘制和了解前南问题国际法庭罪犯获释后走什么路以及为什么走的第一次尝试之一。研究发现,那些宣扬对过去的民族主义解释并否认自己的责任和参与犯罪的人,经常受到西巴尔干地区乐于接受的国内观众的欢迎。他们成功地利用某些支持网络,如占主导地位的政党或军队和退伍军人组织,夺回了他们在公共生活中的地位。另一方面,那些承认自己的罪行和责任,不提倡对过去进行民族主义解释的罪犯往往发现自己受到排斥,生活在贫困和与世隔绝的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Life After Conviction at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
Of the 92 persons convicted at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), 60 have already served their sentences and been released. Even though in post-conflict environments, the public behaviour of perpetrators can help counter (atrocity crime) denial, establish an authoritative version of the truth and contribute to sustainable reconciliation, we still know little about what happens once they return to their communities. This article is one of the first attempts to systematically map and understand what pathways the ICTY convicts take after release, and why. It finds that those who promote nationalist interpretations of the past and deny their responsibility and involvement in crimes are often hailed by receptive domestic audiences across the Western Balkans. They successfully use certain support networks, such as dominant political parties or military and war veterans’ organizations, to take back their place in public life. On the other hand, those convicts who have admitted their guilt and responsibility and do not promote a nationalist interpretation of the past often find themselves ostracized, living in poverty and seclusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
22.20%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Criminal Justice aims to promote a profound collective reflection on the new problems facing international law. Established by a group of distinguished criminal lawyers and international lawyers, the Journal addresses the major problems of justice from the angle of law, jurisprudence, criminology, penal philosophy, and the history of international judicial institutions. It is intended for graduate and post-graduate students, practitioners, academics, government officials, as well as the hundreds of people working for international criminal courts.
期刊最新文献
The Biological Weapons Amendment to the ICC Statute and National Provisions Victims’ Perspectives on Participation in the Ongwen Case Witnessing Ongwen The Ongwen Case at the International Criminal Court as a Test of the Court’s Outreach Programming in Northern Uganda Targeted Sanctions as a Pathway to Accountability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1