采掘性和包容性制度对俄罗斯地区创业持续性的长期影响

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS Voprosy Ekonomiki Pub Date : 2023-07-10 DOI:10.32609/0042-8736-2023-7-115-141
Stepan Zemtsov, Y. Tsareva
{"title":"采掘性和包容性制度对俄罗斯地区创业持续性的长期影响","authors":"Stepan Zemtsov, Y. Tsareva","doi":"10.32609/0042-8736-2023-7-115-141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some institutions can restrict or stimulate the  business activity, which affects long­term economic  growth. To assess this  influence on regional level, we have collected and processed  historical data on the  distribution of serfs, the  creation of universities, and  business  activity over  more  than a century. By business activity, we mean various  direct and  indirect assessments of the  involvement of the  population in entrepreneurial activity: merchants, NEPmen, cooperatives, small businesses, etc. Although the  geography of business  activity has constantly changed, we can  identify  relatively stable centers  (Moscow,  St. Petersburg, the  south  of the  Far Eastern Russia) and the  periphery (some regions of the  North Caucasus, the Central  Black   Earth  and   the Volga   regions).  Econometric calculations confirm  the  existence of a relationship between the  current density of small businesses  in the  Russian  regions and the  density of cooperatives in the  late Soviet period; the  relationship with  the  density of retail enterprises disappears by the 1970s as the planned economy  strengthens. But the relationship  with the  merchant class is ambiguous: only  in some regions  did  the  entrepreneurial culture manage  to survive  the  Soviet period. We distinguish three  main channels of  influence of  the historical level  of  business  activity on  the  modern  one: geographical, functional, and  socio­cultural.  According to the calculations, the  earlier  emergence  of universities in the  regions  contributed to the  spread  of business  culture and could stimulate the  emergence  of more inclusive institutions, but serfdom, as an extractive institution, on the  contrary, could  limit incentives for entrepreneurship. Even  after a radical change  in the  political and  economic regime, the  influence of extractive institutions on business  activity may persist, and  inclusive institutions take a significant amount of time to take root.","PeriodicalId":45534,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term effects of extractive and inclusive institutions on entrepreneurship persistence in Russian regions\",\"authors\":\"Stepan Zemtsov, Y. Tsareva\",\"doi\":\"10.32609/0042-8736-2023-7-115-141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Some institutions can restrict or stimulate the  business activity, which affects long­term economic  growth. To assess this  influence on regional level, we have collected and processed  historical data on the  distribution of serfs, the  creation of universities, and  business  activity over  more  than a century. By business activity, we mean various  direct and  indirect assessments of the  involvement of the  population in entrepreneurial activity: merchants, NEPmen, cooperatives, small businesses, etc. Although the  geography of business  activity has constantly changed, we can  identify  relatively stable centers  (Moscow,  St. Petersburg, the  south  of the  Far Eastern Russia) and the  periphery (some regions of the  North Caucasus, the Central  Black   Earth  and   the Volga   regions).  Econometric calculations confirm  the  existence of a relationship between the  current density of small businesses  in the  Russian  regions and the  density of cooperatives in the  late Soviet period; the  relationship with  the  density of retail enterprises disappears by the 1970s as the planned economy  strengthens. But the relationship  with the  merchant class is ambiguous: only  in some regions  did  the  entrepreneurial culture manage  to survive  the  Soviet period. We distinguish three  main channels of  influence of  the historical level  of  business  activity on  the  modern  one: geographical, functional, and  socio­cultural.  According to the calculations, the  earlier  emergence  of universities in the  regions  contributed to the  spread  of business  culture and could stimulate the  emergence  of more inclusive institutions, but serfdom, as an extractive institution, on the  contrary, could  limit incentives for entrepreneurship. Even  after a radical change  in the  political and  economic regime, the  influence of extractive institutions on business  activity may persist, and  inclusive institutions take a significant amount of time to take root.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy Ekonomiki\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy Ekonomiki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-7-115-141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-7-115-141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一些制度可以限制或刺激商业活动,从而影响长期的经济增长。为了评估这种影响在区域层面上的影响,我们收集和处理了一个多世纪以来农奴分布、大学创建和商业活动的历史数据。通过商业活动,我们指的是对人口参与企业家活动的各种直接和间接评估:商人、nemen、合作社、小企业等。尽管商业活动的地理位置在不断变化,但我们可以确定相对稳定的中心(莫斯科、圣彼得堡、俄罗斯远东南部)和外围(北高加索的一些地区、中部黑土和伏尔加河地区)。计量经济学计算证实,俄罗斯地区目前的小企业密度与苏联后期的合作社密度之间存在关系;到20世纪70年代,随着计划经济的加强,与零售企业密度的关系消失了。但与商人阶层的关系是模糊的:只有在一些地区,企业家文化在苏联时期幸存下来。我们区分了历史层面的商业活动对现代商业活动的三个主要影响渠道:地理、功能和社会文化。根据计算,这些地区较早出现的大学有助于商业文化的传播,并可能刺激更具包容性的机构的出现,但农奴制作为一种采掘制度,相反,可能会限制对创业的激励。即使在政治和经济制度发生根本变化之后,采掘性制度对商业活动的影响可能仍然存在,而包容性制度需要相当长的时间才能扎根。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term effects of extractive and inclusive institutions on entrepreneurship persistence in Russian regions
Some institutions can restrict or stimulate the  business activity, which affects long­term economic  growth. To assess this  influence on regional level, we have collected and processed  historical data on the  distribution of serfs, the  creation of universities, and  business  activity over  more  than a century. By business activity, we mean various  direct and  indirect assessments of the  involvement of the  population in entrepreneurial activity: merchants, NEPmen, cooperatives, small businesses, etc. Although the  geography of business  activity has constantly changed, we can  identify  relatively stable centers  (Moscow,  St. Petersburg, the  south  of the  Far Eastern Russia) and the  periphery (some regions of the  North Caucasus, the Central  Black   Earth  and   the Volga   regions).  Econometric calculations confirm  the  existence of a relationship between the  current density of small businesses  in the  Russian  regions and the  density of cooperatives in the  late Soviet period; the  relationship with  the  density of retail enterprises disappears by the 1970s as the planned economy  strengthens. But the relationship  with the  merchant class is ambiguous: only  in some regions  did  the  entrepreneurial culture manage  to survive  the  Soviet period. We distinguish three  main channels of  influence of  the historical level  of  business  activity on  the  modern  one: geographical, functional, and  socio­cultural.  According to the calculations, the  earlier  emergence  of universities in the  regions  contributed to the  spread  of business  culture and could stimulate the  emergence  of more inclusive institutions, but serfdom, as an extractive institution, on the  contrary, could  limit incentives for entrepreneurship. Even  after a radical change  in the  political and  economic regime, the  influence of extractive institutions on business  activity may persist, and  inclusive institutions take a significant amount of time to take root.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Ekonomiki
Voprosy Ekonomiki ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
86
期刊最新文献
The world in the maze of sanctions: Ambiguity of empirical evidence How does bank lending affect small and medium-sized businesses? Reform of capital adequacy regulation in the world Islamic banking market Talents and their professors: What and how to teach? Reform of economic education or reform of economic knowledge?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1