{"title":"建国话语与光复时期三一运动失败的纪念","authors":"M. Lee","doi":"10.1353/seo.2022.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The March First Movement was a politically significant event during Korea's liberation period. Left- and right-wing political figures fiercely opposed one another over questions of state-building and aimed to justify their leadership by referencing events of the colonial era. The March First Movement played a crucial symbolic role in this context, and its commemoration subsequently became a key issue that led to violent struggles. During the liberation period, authors who engaged in state-building discourses displayed ambivalent attitudes toward ceremonies commemorating the March First Movement. Various works of literature examining the March First Movement ceremonies during the liberation period question the patriotic figures who devoted themselves to saving the nation. The anxieties of colonial subjects in their works reveal another side of history that cannot be reduced to national sacrifice and instead represents the deaths of the unnamed who participated in the March First Movement. The commemoration of the colonial past failed to stabilize the official history of the newborn nation-state. Consequently, literature regarding the March First Movement written during the liberation period prompts us to reconsider remembrance of the colonial past beyond the state-building discourse.","PeriodicalId":41678,"journal":{"name":"Seoul Journal of Korean Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State-Building Discourse and the Failed Commemoration of the March First Independence Movement during the Liberation Period in Korea\",\"authors\":\"M. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/seo.2022.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The March First Movement was a politically significant event during Korea's liberation period. Left- and right-wing political figures fiercely opposed one another over questions of state-building and aimed to justify their leadership by referencing events of the colonial era. The March First Movement played a crucial symbolic role in this context, and its commemoration subsequently became a key issue that led to violent struggles. During the liberation period, authors who engaged in state-building discourses displayed ambivalent attitudes toward ceremonies commemorating the March First Movement. Various works of literature examining the March First Movement ceremonies during the liberation period question the patriotic figures who devoted themselves to saving the nation. The anxieties of colonial subjects in their works reveal another side of history that cannot be reduced to national sacrifice and instead represents the deaths of the unnamed who participated in the March First Movement. The commemoration of the colonial past failed to stabilize the official history of the newborn nation-state. Consequently, literature regarding the March First Movement written during the liberation period prompts us to reconsider remembrance of the colonial past beyond the state-building discourse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seoul Journal of Korean Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seoul Journal of Korean Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/seo.2022.0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seoul Journal of Korean Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/seo.2022.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
State-Building Discourse and the Failed Commemoration of the March First Independence Movement during the Liberation Period in Korea
Abstract:The March First Movement was a politically significant event during Korea's liberation period. Left- and right-wing political figures fiercely opposed one another over questions of state-building and aimed to justify their leadership by referencing events of the colonial era. The March First Movement played a crucial symbolic role in this context, and its commemoration subsequently became a key issue that led to violent struggles. During the liberation period, authors who engaged in state-building discourses displayed ambivalent attitudes toward ceremonies commemorating the March First Movement. Various works of literature examining the March First Movement ceremonies during the liberation period question the patriotic figures who devoted themselves to saving the nation. The anxieties of colonial subjects in their works reveal another side of history that cannot be reduced to national sacrifice and instead represents the deaths of the unnamed who participated in the March First Movement. The commemoration of the colonial past failed to stabilize the official history of the newborn nation-state. Consequently, literature regarding the March First Movement written during the liberation period prompts us to reconsider remembrance of the colonial past beyond the state-building discourse.
期刊介绍:
Published twice a year under the auspices of the Kyujanggak Institute for Korean Studies at Seoul National University, the Seoul Journal of Korean Studies (SJKS) publishes original, state of the field research on Korea''s past and present. A peer-refereed journal, the Seoul Journal of Korean Studies is distributed to institutions and scholars both internationally and domestically. Work published by SJKS comprise in-depth research on established topics as well as new areas of concern, including transnational studies, that reconfigure scholarship devoted to Korean culture, history, literature, religion, and the arts. Unique features of this journal include the explicit aim of providing an English language forum to shape the field of Korean studies both in and outside of Korea. In addition to articles that represent state of the field research, the Seoul Journal of Korean Studies publishes an extensive "Book Notes" section that places particular emphasis on introducing the very best in Korean language scholarship to scholars around the world.