阅读单词而不是世界:GCSE英语重新考试和文学与生活世界使用的分离

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education Pub Date : 2022-02-22 DOI:10.1080/1358684X.2021.2024427
Rose Veitch
{"title":"阅读单词而不是世界:GCSE英语重新考试和文学与生活世界使用的分离","authors":"Rose Veitch","doi":"10.1080/1358684X.2021.2024427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper explores GCSE English re-sits in post-16 education. The re-sit policy was introduced in England and Wales to improve national literacy rates, yet persistently poor pass rates have drawn robust criticism of the policy. This article argues that traditional discourses of literacy predominate and contribute towards antagonisms between re-sit students and subject English. The high-stakes nature of the qualification and associated performativity pressures compound the difficulties. High levels of test-teaching and technique-spotting impair the ambit of the GCSE re-sit programme to deliver the type of literacy which the policy purports to improve. This autoethnographic study correlates the GCSE re-sit landscape with Paulo Freire’s ‘banking model’ of education and uses the work of The New Literacies Studies to suggest that dominant “autonomous” discourses of literacy are impeding educators’ appreciation of literacies as situated practices.","PeriodicalId":54156,"journal":{"name":"Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading the Word Instead of the World: GCSE English Re-sits and the Divorce of Literacies from Their Lifeworld Use\",\"authors\":\"Rose Veitch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1358684X.2021.2024427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper explores GCSE English re-sits in post-16 education. The re-sit policy was introduced in England and Wales to improve national literacy rates, yet persistently poor pass rates have drawn robust criticism of the policy. This article argues that traditional discourses of literacy predominate and contribute towards antagonisms between re-sit students and subject English. The high-stakes nature of the qualification and associated performativity pressures compound the difficulties. High levels of test-teaching and technique-spotting impair the ambit of the GCSE re-sit programme to deliver the type of literacy which the policy purports to improve. This autoethnographic study correlates the GCSE re-sit landscape with Paulo Freire’s ‘banking model’ of education and uses the work of The New Literacies Studies to suggest that dominant “autonomous” discourses of literacy are impeding educators’ appreciation of literacies as situated practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2021.2024427\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2021.2024427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了GCSE英语在16岁后教育中的重新定位。英格兰和威尔士引入了重新考试政策,以提高全国识字率,但持续的低通过率引发了对该政策的强烈批评。本文认为,传统的读写话语占主导地位,并助长了重读学生与主体英语之间的对立。资格认证的高风险性质和相关的业绩压力加剧了这些困难。高水平的考试教学和技术发现削弱了GCSE重新考试计划的范围,以提供该政策旨在改善的扫盲类型。这项自我民族志研究将GCSE重新考试的情况与保罗·弗莱雷的教育“银行模式”联系起来,并利用《新识字研究》的工作表明,占主导地位的“自主”识字话语阻碍了教育者对识字作为情境实践的欣赏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reading the Word Instead of the World: GCSE English Re-sits and the Divorce of Literacies from Their Lifeworld Use
ABSTRACT This paper explores GCSE English re-sits in post-16 education. The re-sit policy was introduced in England and Wales to improve national literacy rates, yet persistently poor pass rates have drawn robust criticism of the policy. This article argues that traditional discourses of literacy predominate and contribute towards antagonisms between re-sit students and subject English. The high-stakes nature of the qualification and associated performativity pressures compound the difficulties. High levels of test-teaching and technique-spotting impair the ambit of the GCSE re-sit programme to deliver the type of literacy which the policy purports to improve. This autoethnographic study correlates the GCSE re-sit landscape with Paulo Freire’s ‘banking model’ of education and uses the work of The New Literacies Studies to suggest that dominant “autonomous” discourses of literacy are impeding educators’ appreciation of literacies as situated practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education
Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
From the Derived to the Deviant: A Translation-Based Creative Writing Pedagogy Teaching Fairy Tales Old and New: Revisiting Andersen via Emma Donoghue What Keeps a Narrative going? Teaching Narrative Interest Knowledge and English A Philosophical Enquiry into Subject English and Creative Writing , by Oli Belas, London, Routledge, 2023, 146 pp., Hardback £120; £35.09 (ebook), ISBN 978-0367-48736-2 Students’ Understanding of Role
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1