乌干达的不孕症:错过了改善生殖知识和健康的机会

R. Kudesia, M. Muyingo, N. Tran, M. Shah, I. Merkatz, P. Klatsky
{"title":"乌干达的不孕症:错过了改善生殖知识和健康的机会","authors":"R. Kudesia, M. Muyingo, N. Tran, M. Shah, I. Merkatz, P. Klatsky","doi":"10.1097/GRH.0000000000000024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Fertility care is an important unmet need in sub-Saharan Africa and considered low priority by donor countries and agencies. Understanding the social context of infertility may increase effectiveness of reproductive health programs. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of fertile and infertile women in Kampala, Uganda, evaluating reproductive knowledge, quality of life (QOL), and infertility-related social morbidity using validated instruments and survey techniques. Results: QOL scores were lower than previously reported scores in Europe (P<0.001). A majority of respondents (53%) reported that they would rather contract HIV than live with infertility. In all, 46.7% of women listed “family planning” or a reversible contraceptive as a cause of infertility. Reproductive knowledge was low, with only 16.7% of women able to give 3 accurate causes of infertility. Infertile women reported higher rates of interpersonal violence, but these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Infertility in Uganda decreases QOL comparably to other severe medical conditions and more than in prior studies. Common beliefs linking infertility to contraception may hinder implementation of family planning, though the infertility evaluation may help correct misconceptions. The connections between infertility, low reproductive knowledge, contraceptive uptake, and violence demonstrated here merit further study and may assist in designing culturally competent basic reproductive health programs in communities with limited resources.","PeriodicalId":92638,"journal":{"name":"Global reproductive health","volume":"3 1","pages":"e24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infertility in Uganda: a missed opportunity to improve reproductive knowledge and health\",\"authors\":\"R. Kudesia, M. Muyingo, N. Tran, M. Shah, I. Merkatz, P. Klatsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GRH.0000000000000024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Fertility care is an important unmet need in sub-Saharan Africa and considered low priority by donor countries and agencies. Understanding the social context of infertility may increase effectiveness of reproductive health programs. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of fertile and infertile women in Kampala, Uganda, evaluating reproductive knowledge, quality of life (QOL), and infertility-related social morbidity using validated instruments and survey techniques. Results: QOL scores were lower than previously reported scores in Europe (P<0.001). A majority of respondents (53%) reported that they would rather contract HIV than live with infertility. In all, 46.7% of women listed “family planning” or a reversible contraceptive as a cause of infertility. Reproductive knowledge was low, with only 16.7% of women able to give 3 accurate causes of infertility. Infertile women reported higher rates of interpersonal violence, but these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Infertility in Uganda decreases QOL comparably to other severe medical conditions and more than in prior studies. Common beliefs linking infertility to contraception may hinder implementation of family planning, though the infertility evaluation may help correct misconceptions. The connections between infertility, low reproductive knowledge, contraceptive uptake, and violence demonstrated here merit further study and may assist in designing culturally competent basic reproductive health programs in communities with limited resources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global reproductive health\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"e24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global reproductive health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GRH.0000000000000024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GRH.0000000000000024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

引言:生育护理是撒哈拉以南非洲一项尚未满足的重要需求,捐助国和机构认为这一需求不太重要。了解不孕不育的社会背景可以提高生殖健康计划的有效性。方法:我们对乌干达坎帕拉的育龄和不孕妇女进行了一项横断面研究,使用经验证的仪器和调查技术评估生殖知识、生活质量和不孕相关的社会发病率。结果:欧洲的生活质量分数低于以前报告的分数(P<0.001)。大多数受访者(53%)报告说,他们宁愿感染艾滋病毒也不愿不孕。总的来说,46.7%的妇女将“计划生育”或可逆避孕药列为不孕原因。生殖知识水平较低,只有16.7%的女性能够准确说出不孕不育的3个原因。不孕妇女的人际暴力发生率较高,但这些差异在统计学上并不显著。结论:与其他严重疾病相比,乌干达的不孕不育降低了生活质量,而且比先前的研究中降低得更多。将不孕不育与避孕联系起来的普遍看法可能会阻碍计划生育的实施,尽管不孕不育评估可能有助于纠正误解。不孕不育、生殖知识水平低、避孕药具使用率和暴力之间的联系值得进一步研究,并可能有助于在资源有限的社区设计具有文化能力的基本生殖健康计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Infertility in Uganda: a missed opportunity to improve reproductive knowledge and health
Introduction: Fertility care is an important unmet need in sub-Saharan Africa and considered low priority by donor countries and agencies. Understanding the social context of infertility may increase effectiveness of reproductive health programs. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of fertile and infertile women in Kampala, Uganda, evaluating reproductive knowledge, quality of life (QOL), and infertility-related social morbidity using validated instruments and survey techniques. Results: QOL scores were lower than previously reported scores in Europe (P<0.001). A majority of respondents (53%) reported that they would rather contract HIV than live with infertility. In all, 46.7% of women listed “family planning” or a reversible contraceptive as a cause of infertility. Reproductive knowledge was low, with only 16.7% of women able to give 3 accurate causes of infertility. Infertile women reported higher rates of interpersonal violence, but these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Infertility in Uganda decreases QOL comparably to other severe medical conditions and more than in prior studies. Common beliefs linking infertility to contraception may hinder implementation of family planning, though the infertility evaluation may help correct misconceptions. The connections between infertility, low reproductive knowledge, contraceptive uptake, and violence demonstrated here merit further study and may assist in designing culturally competent basic reproductive health programs in communities with limited resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advantages of cryopreservation for fertility preservation due to age-related fertility loss Male factor infertility and implication of fertility treatment in low resource settings Pregnancy outcomes of 4 endometrial preparation protocols in adenomyosis patients with thin endometrium during frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study Prognostic value of a serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin cutoff, twelve days after fresh embryo transfer, on predicting live birth among Ugandan women The fertility care gap in the Global South: lessons from The Gambia, West Africa, and ways forward to establish fertility care for all
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1