断层线和激励机制对知识共享行为的影响

IF 2.7 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems Pub Date : 2022-12-14 DOI:10.1108/vjikms-03-2022-0081
M. Adi, E. Nahartyo
{"title":"断层线和激励机制对知识共享行为的影响","authors":"M. Adi, E. Nahartyo","doi":"10.1108/vjikms-03-2022-0081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine the effect of faultline based on job responsibility and their interaction with the incentive scheme on knowledge-sharing behavior.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis research is an experimental study with a 2 × 2 factorial design between subjects. Faultline and incentive schemes are manipulated into two groups (strong faultline–weak faultline and group incentive–individual incentives). This study involved 89 undergraduate accounting students as participants.\n\n\nFindings\nThis research shows that a strong faultline created a strong social identity effect. Hence, the knowledge-sharing behavior among group members tends to be lower than the weak faultline. Knowledge-sharing behavior tends to be higher in group incentive schemes than individual ones. However, there is no support for interactions between incentive schemes and faultline effects on knowledge-sharing behavior. The results indicate that forming a working subgroup based on informational characteristics attributes reduces cooperative behavior and knowledge sharing between groups.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study adds a new addition to faultline literature by examining the effect of faultline and incentive schemes on knowledge-sharing behavior based on informational characteristics attributes. Previous research on faultline and knowledge sharing was limited and primarily focused on faultlines created by demographic attributes. This study also enriches faultline literature on knowledge-sharing behavior using an experimental design.\n","PeriodicalId":45590,"journal":{"name":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of faultline and incentive schemes on knowledge-sharing behaviour\",\"authors\":\"M. Adi, E. Nahartyo\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/vjikms-03-2022-0081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to examine the effect of faultline based on job responsibility and their interaction with the incentive scheme on knowledge-sharing behavior.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis research is an experimental study with a 2 × 2 factorial design between subjects. Faultline and incentive schemes are manipulated into two groups (strong faultline–weak faultline and group incentive–individual incentives). This study involved 89 undergraduate accounting students as participants.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis research shows that a strong faultline created a strong social identity effect. Hence, the knowledge-sharing behavior among group members tends to be lower than the weak faultline. Knowledge-sharing behavior tends to be higher in group incentive schemes than individual ones. However, there is no support for interactions between incentive schemes and faultline effects on knowledge-sharing behavior. The results indicate that forming a working subgroup based on informational characteristics attributes reduces cooperative behavior and knowledge sharing between groups.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study adds a new addition to faultline literature by examining the effect of faultline and incentive schemes on knowledge-sharing behavior based on informational characteristics attributes. Previous research on faultline and knowledge sharing was limited and primarily focused on faultlines created by demographic attributes. This study also enriches faultline literature on knowledge-sharing behavior using an experimental design.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-03-2022-0081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-03-2022-0081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在检验基于工作责任的断层线及其与激励方案的互动对知识共享行为的影响。设计/方法论/方法本研究是一项实验研究 × 受试者之间的2因子设计。断层线和激励方案被分为两组(强断层线-弱断层线和群体激励-个人激励)。本研究共有89名会计专业本科生参与。研究结果表明,强烈的断层线产生了强烈的社会认同效应。因此,群体成员之间的知识共享行为往往低于弱断层线。群体激励方案中的知识共享行为往往高于个人激励方案。然而,激励机制和断层线效应对知识共享行为的相互作用并没有得到支持。结果表明,基于信息特征属性形成工作子群,可以减少群体之间的合作行为和知识共享。原创性/价值本研究通过考察基于信息特征属性的断层线和激励方案对知识共享行为的影响,为断层线文献增添了新的内容。以前关于断层线和知识共享的研究是有限的,主要集中在人口统计属性造成的断层线上。本研究还通过实验设计丰富了关于知识共享行为的断层线文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of faultline and incentive schemes on knowledge-sharing behaviour
Purpose This study aims to examine the effect of faultline based on job responsibility and their interaction with the incentive scheme on knowledge-sharing behavior. Design/methodology/approach This research is an experimental study with a 2 × 2 factorial design between subjects. Faultline and incentive schemes are manipulated into two groups (strong faultline–weak faultline and group incentive–individual incentives). This study involved 89 undergraduate accounting students as participants. Findings This research shows that a strong faultline created a strong social identity effect. Hence, the knowledge-sharing behavior among group members tends to be lower than the weak faultline. Knowledge-sharing behavior tends to be higher in group incentive schemes than individual ones. However, there is no support for interactions between incentive schemes and faultline effects on knowledge-sharing behavior. The results indicate that forming a working subgroup based on informational characteristics attributes reduces cooperative behavior and knowledge sharing between groups. Originality/value This study adds a new addition to faultline literature by examining the effect of faultline and incentive schemes on knowledge-sharing behavior based on informational characteristics attributes. Previous research on faultline and knowledge sharing was limited and primarily focused on faultlines created by demographic attributes. This study also enriches faultline literature on knowledge-sharing behavior using an experimental design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
21.40%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Does ethical climate of the organization foster entrepreneurial marketing? The role of work engagement and effective knowledge transfer Knowledge capitalization and perceived fairness of reward in real estate sector: mediating role of shared leadership Role of artificial intelligence (AI) in poverty alleviation: a bibliometric analysis Adopting knowledge-sharing-driven blockchain technology in healthcare: a developing country’s perspective Knowledge sharing in open-source software development communities: a review and synthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1