{"title":"Ličnost\ni reakcija na iznenadni događaj","authors":"Marko Tončić","doi":"10.31820/pt.29.3.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to examine interindividual differences in electrodermal responses to a sudden stimulus by using different methods of electrodermal reaction assessment. Modelling the electrodermal response as a simple difference of mean electrodermal level before and after stimulus occurrence was compared with approaches that model the electrodermal response curve over time. The association of differently modelled electrodermal reaction with questionnaire measures of personality traits was examined. Ninety-seven students, mostly females (60 %), with age ranging from 18 to 28 participated in this study. Each subject completed a brief measure of neuroticism and extraversion from the Big Five Inventory (BFI; John et al., 1991, 2008) and participated in one laboratory measurement of electrodermal activity during a period of 8 minutes in which a sudden stimulus was presented. Electrodermal activity was modelled in three ways: 1) as a difference in pre- and post-stimulus responses; 2) including linear effects of time; 3) including quadratic effects of time. The outcomes of differently modelled electrodermal responses were correlated with questionnaire measures of neuroticism and extraversion. The results showed that by taking into account the effects of time (both linear and quadratic) the actual electrodermal data can be fitted significantly better. Likewise, estimates of the electrodermal response that take into account the effects of time result in both higher average response levels and interindividual variability. The electrodermal reaction modelled in this way (linear and quadratic) shows a slightly higher and significant positive correlation with neuroticism when compared to simpler methods, although the differences between the different modelling methods are relatively small. The results obtained support the idea of greater excitability related to the neuroticism trait. Given the intensity of the reaction, it is possible that the excitability associated with neuroticism is not specifically related to the valence of the stimulus that elicits that reaction. The correlations are extremely small, but they do not deviate from those obtained in other studies, especially since it is a single electrodermal measurement (Stemmler & Wacker, 2010). The results also show that correlations with personality traits can be detected even on a small sample and only one measurement by adequately modelling the electrodermal reaction.","PeriodicalId":20858,"journal":{"name":"Psihologijske teme","volume":"29 1","pages":"729-751"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psihologijske teme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31820/pt.29.3.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在通过不同的皮肤电反应评估方法来研究个体间皮肤电反应对突然刺激的差异。将皮电反应建模为刺激发生前后平均皮电水平的简单差异,并与模拟随时间变化的皮电反应曲线的方法进行比较。研究了不同模型的皮肤电反应与人格特质问卷测量的关系。研究对象为97名学生,年龄在18 - 28岁之间,以女性居多(60%)。每个被试都完成了一个简短的神经质和外向性测试,测试来自大五人格量表(BFI;John et al., 1991,2008),并参与了在8分钟的突然刺激期间进行的皮电活动的实验室测量。皮电活动以三种方式建模:1)刺激前和刺激后反应的差异;2)包括时间的线性效应;3)包括时间的二次效应。不同模型的皮肤电反应结果与问卷测量的神经质和外向性相关。结果表明,考虑时间(线性和二次)的影响,实际皮肤电数据的拟合效果明显较好。同样,考虑到时间影响的皮肤电反应的估计会导致更高的平均反应水平和个体间的差异。与简单的方法相比,以这种方式(线性和二次)建模的皮肤电反应与神经质的正相关性略高且显著,尽管不同建模方法之间的差异相对较小。研究结果支持了高兴奋性与神经质特质相关的观点。考虑到反应的强度,与神经质相关的兴奋性可能与引发该反应的刺激的效价没有特别的关系。相关性非常小,但它们并没有偏离其他研究中获得的结果,特别是因为它是单一的皮肤电测量(Stemmler & Wacker, 2010)。结果还表明,即使在一个小样本中,通过充分模拟皮肤电反应,也可以检测到与人格特征的相关性。
This study aimed to examine interindividual differences in electrodermal responses to a sudden stimulus by using different methods of electrodermal reaction assessment. Modelling the electrodermal response as a simple difference of mean electrodermal level before and after stimulus occurrence was compared with approaches that model the electrodermal response curve over time. The association of differently modelled electrodermal reaction with questionnaire measures of personality traits was examined. Ninety-seven students, mostly females (60 %), with age ranging from 18 to 28 participated in this study. Each subject completed a brief measure of neuroticism and extraversion from the Big Five Inventory (BFI; John et al., 1991, 2008) and participated in one laboratory measurement of electrodermal activity during a period of 8 minutes in which a sudden stimulus was presented. Electrodermal activity was modelled in three ways: 1) as a difference in pre- and post-stimulus responses; 2) including linear effects of time; 3) including quadratic effects of time. The outcomes of differently modelled electrodermal responses were correlated with questionnaire measures of neuroticism and extraversion. The results showed that by taking into account the effects of time (both linear and quadratic) the actual electrodermal data can be fitted significantly better. Likewise, estimates of the electrodermal response that take into account the effects of time result in both higher average response levels and interindividual variability. The electrodermal reaction modelled in this way (linear and quadratic) shows a slightly higher and significant positive correlation with neuroticism when compared to simpler methods, although the differences between the different modelling methods are relatively small. The results obtained support the idea of greater excitability related to the neuroticism trait. Given the intensity of the reaction, it is possible that the excitability associated with neuroticism is not specifically related to the valence of the stimulus that elicits that reaction. The correlations are extremely small, but they do not deviate from those obtained in other studies, especially since it is a single electrodermal measurement (Stemmler & Wacker, 2010). The results also show that correlations with personality traits can be detected even on a small sample and only one measurement by adequately modelling the electrodermal reaction.