{"title":"人工神经网络、支持向量机、决策树、随机森林、委员会机等智能系统有助于提高碳酸盐岩油藏低矿化度注水动态预测","authors":"Ali Shafiei, Afshin Tatar, Mahsheed Rayhani , Madiyar Kairat , Ingkar Askarova","doi":"10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>A large body of experimental research supports the effectiveness of Low Salinity<span> Water Injection<span> (LSWI) for enhanced oil recovery from </span></span></span>carbonate reservoirs in laboratory scale. Development of robust predictive smart models connecting effective parameters controlling this complex process to Final Recovery Factor (</span><em>RF</em><sub><em>f</em></sub><span><span>), as the target parameter, is of a paramount importance. The main objective of this research work is to develop intelligent models using Artificial Neural Network<span> (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Committee Machine Intelligent System (CMIS) to forecast performance of LSWI in carbonates using experimental data reported in the literature. Random Search (RS) and Anneal (AL) algorithms were used for optimization of hyperparameters. After data collection from 47 reliable coreflooding studies (582 data points), a rigorous </span></span>data preprocessing was conducted to ensure quality of the database. Features selection process was used to determine the main parameters controlling LSWI performance in carbonates: brine permeability (</span><em>K</em><sub><em>b</em></sub><span>), core diameter (d), porosity (Φ), and residual water saturation (</span><em>S</em><sub><em>wi</em></sub>) of the core, <em>HCO</em><sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> concentration, and salinity (<em>S</em>) of the connate brine, the salinity (<em>S</em>) of the injected brine, and initial recovery factor (<em>RF</em><sub><em>i</em></sub>) which were used for development of the models. We considered initial oil recovery (RF<sub>i</sub><span>) in this research work, which was not considered in previous works reported in the literature. The applicability domain analysis showed that training and testing response outliers were zero and 9, respectively, indicating acceptable quality of the database. Performance of the developed smart models was analyzed and compared using statistical and graphical error analysis methods. The best performance was obtained for the RF model with Root Mean Square Error (</span><em>RMSE</em><span>) of 2.497 and 5.757 for training and testing datasets, respectively, which exhibits a very good agreement with the experimental data.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":16717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 111046"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial neural network, support vector machine, decision tree, random forest, and committee machine intelligent system help to improve performance prediction of low salinity water injection in carbonate oil reservoirs\",\"authors\":\"Ali Shafiei, Afshin Tatar, Mahsheed Rayhani , Madiyar Kairat , Ingkar Askarova\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>A large body of experimental research supports the effectiveness of Low Salinity<span> Water Injection<span> (LSWI) for enhanced oil recovery from </span></span></span>carbonate reservoirs in laboratory scale. Development of robust predictive smart models connecting effective parameters controlling this complex process to Final Recovery Factor (</span><em>RF</em><sub><em>f</em></sub><span><span>), as the target parameter, is of a paramount importance. The main objective of this research work is to develop intelligent models using Artificial Neural Network<span> (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Committee Machine Intelligent System (CMIS) to forecast performance of LSWI in carbonates using experimental data reported in the literature. Random Search (RS) and Anneal (AL) algorithms were used for optimization of hyperparameters. After data collection from 47 reliable coreflooding studies (582 data points), a rigorous </span></span>data preprocessing was conducted to ensure quality of the database. Features selection process was used to determine the main parameters controlling LSWI performance in carbonates: brine permeability (</span><em>K</em><sub><em>b</em></sub><span>), core diameter (d), porosity (Φ), and residual water saturation (</span><em>S</em><sub><em>wi</em></sub>) of the core, <em>HCO</em><sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> concentration, and salinity (<em>S</em>) of the connate brine, the salinity (<em>S</em>) of the injected brine, and initial recovery factor (<em>RF</em><sub><em>i</em></sub>) which were used for development of the models. We considered initial oil recovery (RF<sub>i</sub><span>) in this research work, which was not considered in previous works reported in the literature. The applicability domain analysis showed that training and testing response outliers were zero and 9, respectively, indicating acceptable quality of the database. Performance of the developed smart models was analyzed and compared using statistical and graphical error analysis methods. The best performance was obtained for the RF model with Root Mean Square Error (</span><em>RMSE</em><span>) of 2.497 and 5.757 for training and testing datasets, respectively, which exhibits a very good agreement with the experimental data.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"219 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111046\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920410522008981\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920410522008981","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artificial neural network, support vector machine, decision tree, random forest, and committee machine intelligent system help to improve performance prediction of low salinity water injection in carbonate oil reservoirs
A large body of experimental research supports the effectiveness of Low Salinity Water Injection (LSWI) for enhanced oil recovery from carbonate reservoirs in laboratory scale. Development of robust predictive smart models connecting effective parameters controlling this complex process to Final Recovery Factor (RFf), as the target parameter, is of a paramount importance. The main objective of this research work is to develop intelligent models using Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Committee Machine Intelligent System (CMIS) to forecast performance of LSWI in carbonates using experimental data reported in the literature. Random Search (RS) and Anneal (AL) algorithms were used for optimization of hyperparameters. After data collection from 47 reliable coreflooding studies (582 data points), a rigorous data preprocessing was conducted to ensure quality of the database. Features selection process was used to determine the main parameters controlling LSWI performance in carbonates: brine permeability (Kb), core diameter (d), porosity (Φ), and residual water saturation (Swi) of the core, HCO3− concentration, and salinity (S) of the connate brine, the salinity (S) of the injected brine, and initial recovery factor (RFi) which were used for development of the models. We considered initial oil recovery (RFi) in this research work, which was not considered in previous works reported in the literature. The applicability domain analysis showed that training and testing response outliers were zero and 9, respectively, indicating acceptable quality of the database. Performance of the developed smart models was analyzed and compared using statistical and graphical error analysis methods. The best performance was obtained for the RF model with Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 2.497 and 5.757 for training and testing datasets, respectively, which exhibits a very good agreement with the experimental data.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering, the geology and the science of petroleum and natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of petroleum engineering, natural gas engineering and petroleum (natural gas) geology. An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership.
The Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering covers the fields of petroleum (and natural gas) exploration, production and flow in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of petroleum and natural gas; petroleum geochemistry; reservoir engineering; reservoir simulation; rock mechanics; petrophysics; pore-level phenomena; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced oil and gas recovery; petroleum geology; compaction/diagenesis; petroleum economics; drilling and drilling fluids; thermodynamics and phase behavior; fluid mechanics; multi-phase flow in porous media; production engineering; formation evaluation; exploration methods; CO2 Sequestration in geological formations/sub-surface; management and development of unconventional resources such as heavy oil and bitumen, tight oil and liquid rich shales.