偶然的教师工会化的好处和局限性:一个工会和非工会机构的比较

Q2 Arts and Humanities Labor Studies Journal Pub Date : 2022-12-04 DOI:10.1177/0160449X221142618
Elizabeth Klainot-Hess
{"title":"偶然的教师工会化的好处和局限性:一个工会和非工会机构的比较","authors":"Elizabeth Klainot-Hess","doi":"10.1177/0160449X221142618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While union membership has declined over the last several decades, there has been a recent surge in union organizing among contingent faculty—non-tenure-track faculty who tend to experience low wages and job insecurity. Based on interviews with 100 contingent faculty at two large public research universities—one where contingent faculty are unionized, and one where they are not—this article demonstrates that contingent faculty at the unionized institution experience higher job satisfaction, greater job security, and higher wages than those at the non-unionized university, but that the union still faces some limitations in improving contingent faculty jobs.","PeriodicalId":35267,"journal":{"name":"Labor Studies Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"70 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Benefits and Limitations of Contingent Faculty Unionization: A Comparison of a Union and Non-Union Institution\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Klainot-Hess\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0160449X221142618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While union membership has declined over the last several decades, there has been a recent surge in union organizing among contingent faculty—non-tenure-track faculty who tend to experience low wages and job insecurity. Based on interviews with 100 contingent faculty at two large public research universities—one where contingent faculty are unionized, and one where they are not—this article demonstrates that contingent faculty at the unionized institution experience higher job satisfaction, greater job security, and higher wages than those at the non-unionized university, but that the union still faces some limitations in improving contingent faculty jobs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labor Studies Journal\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"70 - 90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labor Studies Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449X221142618\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449X221142618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然工会成员人数在过去几十年里有所下降,但最近在临时教职员工中组织工会的人数激增,这些非终身教职员工往往工资低,工作不稳定。基于对两所大型公立研究型大学的100名临时教师的采访——其中一所大学的临时教师加入了工会,另一所大学的临时教师没有加入工会——本文表明,与未加入工会的大学相比,加入工会的大学的临时教师有更高的工作满意度、更大的工作保障和更高的工资,但工会在改善临时教师工作方面仍面临一些限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Benefits and Limitations of Contingent Faculty Unionization: A Comparison of a Union and Non-Union Institution
While union membership has declined over the last several decades, there has been a recent surge in union organizing among contingent faculty—non-tenure-track faculty who tend to experience low wages and job insecurity. Based on interviews with 100 contingent faculty at two large public research universities—one where contingent faculty are unionized, and one where they are not—this article demonstrates that contingent faculty at the unionized institution experience higher job satisfaction, greater job security, and higher wages than those at the non-unionized university, but that the union still faces some limitations in improving contingent faculty jobs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Labor Studies Journal
Labor Studies Journal Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Labor Studies Journal is the official journal of the United Association for Labor Education and is a multi-disciplinary journal publishing research on work, workers, labor organizations, and labor studies and worker education in the US and internationally. The Journal is interested in manuscripts using a diversity of research methods, both qualitative and quantitative, directed at a general audience including union, university, and community based labor educators, labor activists and scholars from across the social sciences and humanities. As a multi-disciplinary journal, manuscripts should be directed at a general audience, and care should be taken to make methods, especially highly quantitative ones, accessible to a general reader.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing the Benefits and Limitations of Non-Degree Credentials: The Case of Apprenticeship in Oregon The Potential and Limits of Spontaneous Labor Activism on Social Media: The Search for Justice among Chinese Restaurant Workers Book Review: The Hammer: Power, Inequality, and the Struggle for the Soul of Labor by Nolan, Hamilton Book Review: Our Veterans: Winners, Losers, Friends and Enemies on the New Terrain of Veterans Affairs by Gordon, Suzanne, Steve Early and Jasper Craven Opening the Ballot Box: Examining the Union Voting Behavior of Scholarship Football Players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1