鹿特丹行为洞察集团的综合评价

IF 3.2 3区管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Administration & Society Pub Date : 2023-06-25 DOI:10.1177/00953997231180302

Malte Dewies, I. Merkelbach, J. Edelenbos, Kirsten I. M. Rohde, S. Denktaş

{"title":"鹿特丹行为洞察集团的综合评价","authors":"Malte Dewies, I. Merkelbach, J. Edelenbos, Kirsten I. M. Rohde, S. Denktaş","doi":"10.1177/00953997231180302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Behavioral insights teams (BITs) employ behavioral experts and policy professionals to collaboratively improve public policy. Most evaluations of BITs focus on the interventions that BITs develop, but not the functioning of BITs. Here, we report the first comprehensive evaluation of a BIT, the Behavioral Insights Group Rotterdam. We investigate how its resources were used, for what activities, with what outputs, and to which effects. Using quantitative and qualitative methods, we derive nine propositions to describe and improve the integration of behavioral insights into public policy and administration.","PeriodicalId":47966,"journal":{"name":"Administration & Society","volume":"55 1","pages":"1555 - 1583"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive Evaluation of the Behavioral Insights Group Rotterdam\",\"authors\":\"Malte Dewies, I. Merkelbach, J. Edelenbos, Kirsten I. M. Rohde, S. Denktaş\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00953997231180302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Behavioral insights teams (BITs) employ behavioral experts and policy professionals to collaboratively improve public policy. Most evaluations of BITs focus on the interventions that BITs develop, but not the functioning of BITs. Here, we report the first comprehensive evaluation of a BIT, the Behavioral Insights Group Rotterdam. We investigate how its resources were used, for what activities, with what outputs, and to which effects. Using quantitative and qualitative methods, we derive nine propositions to describe and improve the integration of behavioral insights into public policy and administration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administration & Society\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"1555 - 1583\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administration & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997231180302\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration & Society","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997231180302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

行为洞察团队（BIT）聘请行为专家和政策专业人员共同改进公共政策。大多数对双边投资条约的评价侧重于双边投资条约制定的干预措施，而不是双边投资条约运作情况。在这里，我们报告了对BIT的第一次全面评估，鹿特丹行为洞察小组。我们调查它的资源是如何使用的，用于什么活动，有什么产出，以及产生什么影响。使用定量和定性的方法，我们得出了九个命题来描述和改进行为见解与公共政策和行政的整合。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Comprehensive Evaluation of the Behavioral Insights Group Rotterdam

Behavioral insights teams (BITs) employ behavioral experts and policy professionals to collaboratively improve public policy. Most evaluations of BITs focus on the interventions that BITs develop, but not the functioning of BITs. Here, we report the first comprehensive evaluation of a BIT, the Behavioral Insights Group Rotterdam. We investigate how its resources were used, for what activities, with what outputs, and to which effects. Using quantitative and qualitative methods, we derive nine propositions to describe and improve the integration of behavioral insights into public policy and administration.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Administration & Society PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

4.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Administration & Society seeks to further the understanding of public and human service organizations, their administrative processes, and their effect on society. The journal publishes empirically oriented research reports and theoretically specific articles that synthesize or contribute to the advancement of understanding and explanation in these fields. Of particular interest are (1) studies that analyze the effects of the introduction of administrative strategies, programs, change interventions, and training; and (2) studies of intergroup, interorganizational, and organization-environment relationships and policy processes.